§Why CasetextPricing

SimpleAir, Inc. v. AWS Convergence Technologies, Inc. et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re Joint MOTION to Change Venue Defendants' Joint Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404

8 Cited authorities

  1. In re Genentech, Inc.

    566 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 807 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that relevant evidence in patent cases often comes from the accused infringer and may weigh in favor of transfer to that location

  2. In re Hoffmann-La Roche

    587 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 326 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding local interest factor favored transfer where allegedly infringing product was developed in transferee district

  3. In re Nintendo Co.

    589 F.3d 1194 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 275 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "in a case featuring most witnesses and evidence closer to the transferee venue with few or no convenience factors favoring the venue chosen by the plaintiff, the trial court should grant a motion to transfer"

  4. Autobytel, Inc. v. Insweb Corporation

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-cv-524 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)   Cited 10 times

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-cv-524. March 31, 2009 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER T. WARD, District Judge I. Introduction Pending before the Court is defendant Internet Brands Inc.'s ("Internet Brands") Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). (Dkt. No. 49). After carefully considering the parties' written submissions and the applicable law, the Court DENIES the motion for reasons discussed below. The Court also DENIES as moot, defendant Internet

  5. Motiva LLC v. Nintendo Co LTD

    CASE NO. 6:08 CV 429, PATENT CASE (E.D. Tex. Jun. 30, 2009)   Cited 1 times

    CASE NO. 6:08 CV 429, PATENT CASE. June 30, 2009 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge Before the Court is Nintendo of America, Inc. ("Nintendo America") and Nintendo Co. Ltd.'s ("Nintendo Co.") (collectively "Defendants") motion to transfer venue (Docket No. 17). After consideration of the parties' briefing, Defendants' motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND On November 10, 2008, Motiva, LLC ("Motiva") filed this action alleging that Defendants infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,292,151 (the

  6. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 28,851 times   189 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

  7. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  8. Section 1989 - Witness not obliged to attend unless resident within state at time of service

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1989   Cited 71 times   1 Legal Analyses

    A witness, including a witness specified in subdivision (b) of Section 1987, is not obliged to attend as a witness before any court, judge, justice or any other officer, unless the witness is a resident within the state at the time of service. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 1989 Amended by Stats. 1981, Ch. 184, Sec. 3.