39 Cited authorities

  1. Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.

    458 U.S. 50 (1982)   Cited 2,967 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Bankruptcy Act of 1978 was unconstitutional in part because it allowed bankruptcy courts to adjudicate state common law claims
  2. Mitchum v. Foster

    407 U.S. 225 (1972)   Cited 1,259 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1983 falls within the exceptions to the Anti-Injunction Act
  3. State Farm Fire Cas. Co. v. Tashire

    386 U.S. 523 (1967)   Cited 738 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1335 “require only ‘minimal diversity,’ that is, diversity of citizenship between two or more claimants, without regard to the circumstance that other rival claimants may be co-citizens” (footnote omitted)
  4. Romero v. International Term. Co.

    358 U.S. 354 (1959)   Cited 958 times
    Holding that the district court had pendant jurisdiction to consider maintenance and cure claims brought "by a complaint at law rather than by a libel in admiralty" because the complaint also alleged a Jones Act violation, which was within the district court's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331
  5. Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co.

    708 F.3d 527 (4th Cir. 2013)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rule 12(b) dismissal, concluding that "[b]ecause the well-pleaded facts do not permit [this] [C]ourt to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged — but it has not shown — that the pleader is entitled to relief" (internal quotation marks omitted; final two sets of brackets in original)
  6. Brawer v. Options Clearing Corp.

    484 U.S. 819 (1987)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that federal employee cannot file for damages against supervisor for an unconstitutional adverse personnel action, when Congress has provided adequate administrative remedy
  7. In re Prudential Lines Inc.

    928 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 148 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contingent interest in carrying forward net operating loss to offset against future income is property of the estate
  8. Weisfelner v. Blavatnik (In re Lyondell Chemical Co.)

    467 B.R. 712 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that the court should not infer consent where defendants seek withdrawal at the close of discovery and "where new precedent renders unclear the authority of the bankruptcy [court] to enter final judgment on certain claims"
  9. In re Chugach Forest Products, Inc.

    23 F.3d 241 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 123 times
    Noting that bankruptcy "does not stay actions against guarantors"
  10. Mackensworth v. S.S. American Merchant

    28 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that where plaintiff's notice of joinder sought to amend existing complaint by "joining" additional claim under Rule 18, Rule 15 would apply
  11. Section 362 - Automatic stay

    11 U.S.C. § 362   Cited 29,433 times   174 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that cause exists to lift the stay because no bankruptcy purpose would be served by keeping the stay in place
  12. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,421 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  13. Section 1335 - Interpleader

    28 U.S.C. § 1335   Cited 2,211 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting original jurisdiction to the district courts in "any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader" "if two or more adverse claimants . . . are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property" as shall have been pleaded into court
  14. Section 2361 - Process and procedure

    28 U.S.C. § 2361   Cited 712 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the “district court . . . may discharge the plaintiff from further liability”
  15. Section 31301 - Definitions

    46 U.S.C. § 31301   Cited 344 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining "necessaries" as "includ[ing] repairs, supplies, towage and the use of a dry dock or marine railway"