Cordoba v. Dillard's, Inc.
419 F.3d 1169 (11th Cir. 2005) Cited 674 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that a claim "built ... from language in our own opinions" was not frivolous
Solliday v. Federal Officers
413 F. App'x 206 (11th Cir. 2011) Cited 139 timesHolding that prisoner had no liberty interest in conditions of confinement
Antenor v. D S Farms
88 F.3d 925 (11th Cir. 1996) Cited 172 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that power to veto hiring decision of another employer supported finding that defendant was joint employer
Layton v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
686 F.3d 1172 (11th Cir. 2012) Cited 78 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding against joint employment where the defendant "did not involve itself with the specifics of how [its] goals would be reached"
Martinez-Mendoza v. Champion Intl. Corp.
340 F.3d 1200 (11th Cir. 2003) Cited 83 timesHolding that court should have ruled on certification even after granting summary judgment for the defendant
Howard v. Oregon
276 F. App'x 940 (11th Cir. 2008) Cited 18 timesNo. 07-15809 Non-Argument Calendar. May 6, 2008. Christopher B. Howard, Altamonte Spg, FL, pro se. Brian L. Lerner, Hogan Hartson, L.L.P., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 07-00035-CV-ORL-19DAB. Before BIRCH, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Christopher Howard, an African-American male proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to his former employer, Oregon
Gonzalez-Sanchez v. International Paper Co.
346 F.3d 1017 (11th Cir. 2003) Cited 12 timesHolding that defendant did not jointly employ plaintiffs where there was no evidence that it issued paychecks, withheld taxes, or provided insurance, housing, transportation, or tools to plaintiffs
Harris v. Gourley
CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-99 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 27, 2013) Cited 1 timesObserving that “dog sniffs for possible accelerant do not constitute substantive evidence of the presence of an accelerant”