32 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,829 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. Warth v. Seldin

    422 U.S. 490 (1975)   Cited 11,861 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"
  3. Roberts v. United States Jaycees

    468 U.S. 609 (1984)   Cited 2,005 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"
  4. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises

    471 U.S. 539 (1985)   Cited 1,215 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if a new work "supersede the use of the original," it is probably not a fair use
  5. N. A. A. C. P. v. Alabama

    357 U.S. 449 (1958)   Cited 1,954 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[c]ompelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs" may violate the First Amendment
  6. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.

    204 F.3d 149 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 377 times
    Holding an injury "need not be large"—"an identifiable trifle will suffice"
  7. Gibson v. Florida Legislative Comm

    372 U.S. 539 (1963)   Cited 296 times
    Holding that "an investigation which intrudes into the area of constitutionally protected rights of speech" is valid so long as (Continued) there is a "substantial relation" between the information sought and a compelling state interest
  8. Public Int. Research of N.J. v. Powell Duffryn

    913 F.2d 64 (3d Cir. 1990)   Cited 305 times
    Holding that the district court properly relied upon “the large number of gross exceedances in concluding that [the defendant's] violations were serious”
  9. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation

    707 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Kan. 2010)   Cited 106 times
    Setting aside order when the magistrate judge “applied an incorrect legal standard or failed to consider an element of the applicable standard”
  10. Afl-Cio v. Federal Election Com'n

    333 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that the disclosure of internal planning materials of a political organization would have a chilling effect on the group's First Amendment rights
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,949 times   653 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Section 7413 - Federal enforcement

    42 U.S.C. § 7413   Cited 561 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Administrator discretion to extend the ambient air quality standard attainment date set in the 1977 Act by up to three years for steelmaking facilities