15 Cited authorities

  1. Merrill v. Dabit

    547 U.S. 71 (2006)   Cited 668 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law class action securities fraud claims brought by “holders” of securities are, just like those of “purchasers” and “sellers,” preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act
  2. Dunn Industrial Group v. City of Sugar Creek

    112 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. 2003)   Cited 260 times
    Holding that an arbitration clause can be incorporated by reference into a contract
  3. In re Salomon Smith Barney Mutual Fund Fees Litigation

    441 F. Supp. 2d 579 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 57 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no private right of action to enforce §§ 34(b) and 48 of the ICA and citing other post- Olmsted cases in the same district that reached the same conclusion
  4. State ex Rel. Painewebber v. Voorhees

    891 S.W.2d 126 (Mo. 1995)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that speaker must have "knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth"
  5. Bancoult v. McNamara

    227 F. Supp. 2d 144 (D.D.C. 2002)   Cited 42 times
    Denying preliminary injunction where “the parties hotly dispute [d] certain basic points”
  6. Felton v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Co.

    429 F. Supp. 2d 684 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 30 times
    Holding common law breach of contract claim sounded in fraud where it was also "a quintessential example of a fraudulent omission of a material fact under the federal securities laws"
  7. Figueroa v. U.S. Postal Service

    422 F. Supp. 2d 866 (N.D. Ohio 2006)   Cited 26 times
    Noting that the "Sixth Circuit has made clear that FECA provides the only remedy for an employee disabled by work-related stress. . . Accordingly, mental distress FTCA claims predicated on a supervisor's workplace conduct are preempted by FECA"
  8. Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Bittner

    920 S.W.2d 581 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 30 times
    Affirming summary judgment where equitable estoppel failed as a matter of law because the party claiming the benefit of the estoppel could not show he was misled where both parties had equal means to ascertaining the facts
  9. Scognamillo v. Credit Suisse First Boston LLC

    No. C03-2061 TEH (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2005)   Cited 13 times
    Holding as a matter of law that reliance on a representation by adversary in execution of merger agreement was unjustifiable where parties were represented by counsel during the negotiations process
  10. Dinsmore v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.

    1999 S.D. 56 (S.D. 1999)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that some parties, because of their superior knowledge and training in the area, owe a fiduciary duty to the other party of "utmost good faith, integrity and loyalty"