45 Cited authorities

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America

    511 U.S. 375 (1994)   Cited 20,346 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absent a reservation of jurisdiction in the stipulated dismissal order, federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider enforcement of a settlement agreement
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Env't

    523 U.S. 83 (1998)   Cited 11,301 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction because "none of the relief sought by respondent would likely remedy its alleged injury in fact"
  3. Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Cuno

    547 U.S. 332 (2006)   Cited 2,911 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs did not have standing because their injury was " 'conjectural or hypothetical' in that it depend[ed] on how legislators respond[ed] to a reduction in revenue"
  4. Warth v. Seldin

    422 U.S. 490 (1975)   Cited 12,269 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"
  5. Allen v. Wright

    468 U.S. 737 (1984)   Cited 4,894 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"
  6. Castle Rock v. Gonzales

    545 U.S. 748 (2005)   Cited 1,440 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a benefit is not a protected interest if government officials have discretion to grant or deny it
  7. Raines v. Byrd

    521 U.S. 811 (1997)   Cited 1,865 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding specifically and only that "individual members of Congress [lack] Article III standing"
  8. Linda R. S. v. Richard D

    410 U.S. 614 (1973)   Cited 3,795 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a mother lacked standing to seek an injunction to force the prosecution of her child’s father for failing to pay child support, reasoning that because prosecution would result only in the father being jailed, it was overly "speculative" whether an injunction would result in future child support payments
  9. Baker v. Carr

    369 U.S. 186 (1962)   Cited 5,306 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge Tennessee's apportionment of state representatives when that apportionment "effect[ed] a gross disproportion of representation to voting population"
  10. Schlesinger v. Reservists to Stop the War

    418 U.S. 208 (1974)   Cited 1,153 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance" cannot confer standing
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 362,607 times   962 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1361 - Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty

    28 U.S.C. § 1361   Cited 6,874 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting to the district courts "original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff"
  13. Rule 81 - Applicability of the Rules in General; Removed Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 81   Cited 3,865 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "apply to proceedings for habeas corpus . . . to the extent that the practice in those proceedings: is not specified in a federal statute, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, or the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases; and (B) has previously conformed to the practice in civil actions."
  14. Section Amendment X - Reserved Powers

    U.S. Const. amend. X   Cited 730 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reserving power to the States ‘or to the people.’ "
  15. Section 2 - The House of Representatives

    U.S. Const. art. I, § 2   Cited 559 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Distinguishing between "State" and "State Legislature"
  16. Section 1 - The President

    U.S. Const. art. II, § 1   Cited 468 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Vesting power in "a President"
  17. Section Amendment IX - Unenumerated Rights

    U.S. Const. amend. IX   Cited 337 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"
  18. Section 3332 - Powers and duties

    18 U.S.C. § 3332   Cited 89 times
    Addressing grand jury powers and duties
  19. Section 16-3501 - Persons against whom issued; civil action

    D.C. Code § 16-3501   Cited 7 times   1 Legal Analyses

    A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action. D.C. Code § 16-3501 Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 602, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 562, Pub. L. 91-358

  20. Section Amendment XX - Terms of President, Vice President, Members of Congress: Presidential Vacancy

    U.S. Const. amend. XX   Cited 7 times

    SECTION. 1. The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin. SEC. 2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day