38 Cited authorities

Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.
547 U.S. 388 (2006) Cited 3,813 times 130 Legal Analyses
Holding that traditional four-factor test applies to injunctions against patent infringement
Taylor v. Sturgell
553 U.S. 880 (2008) Cited 3,180 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."
Medimmune, Inc. v. GenenTech, Inc.
549 U.S. 118 (2007) Cited 2,550 times 90 Legal Analyses
Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"
Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
452 U.S. 394 (1981) Cited 2,911 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that considerations of fairness and equity do not vitiate the res judicata effect of a previous, unappealed judgment, even if that judgment "rest on a legal principle subsequently overruled in another case"
Powell v. McCormack
395 U.S. 486 (1969) Cited 3,065 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the obviation of the petitioner's claim for injunctive relief did not render the whole case moot, when a damages claim for backpay remained
Leon v. IDX Systems Corp.
464 F.3d 951 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 773 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs Sarbanes-Oxley claim and Title VII retaliation claims involved the same nucleus of operative facts, including the time, cause, and circumstances of plaintiffs termination
Headwaters Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service
399 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 654 times
Holding that "parallel legal interests alone, identical or otherwise, are not sufficient to establish privity"
Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
414 U.S. 168 (1973) Cited 493 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
E. J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.
955 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 426 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that although the mark logos were dissimilar, “it does not appear that the district court committed clear error in relying on the dominant element GALLO for its finding of similarity in sight, sound and meaning”
Rent-A-Center v. Canyon Television Appliance
944 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1991) Cited 414 times
Holding that intangible injuries, such as damage to advertising efforts and goodwill, can be irreparable harm for purpose of a preliminary injunction
Section 2201 - Creation of remedy
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Cited 24,602 times 61 Legal Analyses
Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment
Section 1651 - Writs
28 U.S.C. § 1651 Cited 11,063 times 60 Legal Analyses
Granting us the power to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of [our] . . . jurisdiction[] and agreeable to the usages and principles of law"
Section 285 - Attorney fees
35 U.S.C. § 285 Cited 3,203 times 480 Legal Analyses
Granting district courts discretion to award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in exceptional cases
Section 2202 - Further relief
28 U.S.C. § 2202 Cited 2,581 times
Permitting court to issue "[f]urther necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment"
Section 305 - Conduct of reexamination proceedings
35 U.S.C. § 305 Cited 173 times 12 Legal Analyses
Noting that "reexamination will be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of Sections 132 and 133"

Shoom, Inc. v. Electronic Imaging Systems of America, Inc.

38 Cited authorities

Holding that traditional four-factor test applies to injunctions against patent infringement

Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."

Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"

Holding that considerations of fairness and equity do not vitiate the res judicata effect of a previous, unappealed judgment, even if that judgment "rest on a legal principle subsequently overruled in another case"

Holding that the obviation of the petitioner's claim for injunctive relief did not render the whole case moot, when a damages claim for backpay remained

Holding that plaintiffs Sarbanes-Oxley claim and Title VII retaliation claims involved the same nucleus of operative facts, including the time, cause, and circumstances of plaintiffs termination

Holding that "parallel legal interests alone, identical or otherwise, are not sufficient to establish privity"

Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

Holding that although the mark logos were dissimilar, “it does not appear that the district court committed clear error in relying on the dominant element GALLO for its finding of similarity in sight, sound and meaning”

Holding that intangible injuries, such as damage to advertising efforts and goodwill, can be irreparable harm for purpose of a preliminary injunction

Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment

Granting us the power to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of [our] . . . jurisdiction[] and agreeable to the usages and principles of law"

Granting district courts discretion to award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in exceptional cases

Permitting court to issue "[f]urther necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment"

Noting that "reexamination will be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of Sections 132 and 133"