25 Cited authorities

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.

    501 U.S. 32 (1991)   Cited 9,258 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may bar from the courtroom a criminal defendant who disrupts a trial" may "assess attorney fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons," and "may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute"
  2. Cooter Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.

    496 U.S. 384 (1990)   Cited 4,145 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is necessarily an abuse of discretion to apply the wrong legal standard
  3. Fink v. Gomez

    239 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 904 times
    Holding sanctions can be imposed for recklessness "coupled with an improper purpose"
  4. Holgate v. Baldwin

    425 F.3d 671 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 411 times
    Holding that we “enforce [Rule 11's] safe harbor provision strictly”
  5. In re Keegan Management, Securities Litigation

    78 F.3d 431 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 522 times
    Holding § 1927 sanctions "must be supported by a finding of subjective bad faith"
  6. Primus Automotive Financial Serv. v. Batarse

    115 F.3d 644 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 461 times
    Holding that a sanction could be upheld under a district court's inherent powers despite the court's failure to specify the source of its authority
  7. Yagman v. Republic Ins

    987 F.2d 622 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 502 times
    Holding that a "sanction based upon the court's inherent power [was] not sustainable" where there was "no indication in the record before us that [plaintiff acting as his own counsel] acted in bad faith or intended to mislead the court"
  8. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles

    879 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 519 times
    Holding four justifications for adjusting the lodestar improper because they are subsumed in the lodestar determination itself
  9. Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.

    914 F.2d 1136 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 481 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "requesting a stay without bond . . . was warranted by existing law."
  10. Barber v. Miller

    146 F.3d 707 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 338 times
    Holding that "[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld" where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period
  11. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 36,015 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  12. Rule 19 - Required Joinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 19   Cited 9,582 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Holding a person must be joined if disposing the action in the person's absence may leave an existing party subject to a "substantial" risk of incurring inconsistent obligations
  13. Section 1927 - Counsel's liability for excessive costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1927   Cited 8,863 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts the power to charge "excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred" due to "unreasonabl[e] and vexatious" conduct
  14. Section 547 - Preferences

    11 U.S.C. § 547   Cited 8,139 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Seeking to avoid preferential transfers