§Why CasetextPricing

Shapiro et al v. Department of Justice

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint

6 Cited authorities

  1. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.

    403 F. App'x 166 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 784 times
    Holding that a district court abuses its discretion by failing to engage in this four-factor test or at least the "equitable analysis" captured by the test

  2. Capitol Sprinkler v. Guest Servs.

    630 F.3d 217 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that district courts act within the scope of their discretion in denying a Rule 54(b) motion to reconsider where the motion raises “no arguments for reconsideration the court had not already rejected on the merits”

  3. Embassy of the Fed. Republic of Nigeria v. Ugwuonye

    901 F. Supp. 2d 92 (D.D.C. 2012)   Cited 11 times
    Noting that even though individual could appear pro se in his personal capacity, he cannot do so as the trustee on behalf of a company

  4. WALLER v. ZYCH

    Civil No: 08-CV-15240 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2009)   Cited 1 times
    Dismissing a habeas petition as moot when the incident report and sanctions were expunged and good conduct time restored

  5. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  6. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,304 times   558 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party