REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint
Holding that a district court abuses its discretion by failing to engage in this four-factor test or at least the "equitable analysis" captured by the test
Holding that district courts act within the scope of their discretion in denying a Rule 54(b) motion to reconsider where the motion raises “no arguments for reconsideration the court had not already rejected on the merits”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 Cited 50,129 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
5 U.S.C. § 552 Cited 12,304 times 558 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party