6 Cited authorities

  1. Capitol Sprinkler v. Guest Servs.

    630 F.3d 217 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that district courts act within the scope of their discretion in denying a Rule 54(b) motion to reconsider where the motion raises “no arguments for reconsideration the court had not already rejected on the merits”
  2. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC v. NATIONAL GRID PLC

    637 F.3d 365 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that the three-month deadline to serve a motion to vacate an arbitration award may not be extended pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)
  3. Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Dept. of Energy

    644 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 64 times
    In Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy, 644 F.2d 969, 980 (3d Cir. 1981), we stated: "In the future this court, in the exercise of its supervisory powers, will require district courts to state explicitly the legal basis as well as the findings that are necessary to demonstrate that the documents are exempt or disclosable under the [Freedom of Information Act]."
  4. Thiel v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

    CV 09-168-BLG-RFC-CSO (D. Mont. Dec. 1, 2010)

    CV 09-168-BLG-RFC-CSO. December 1, 2010 ORDER CAROLYN OSTBY, Magistrate Judge The parties have filed another motion to extend the time for filing an amended complaint. See Court Docs. 16, 21. The Court is concerned that this case has now been pending for more than one year and does not yet have an operative complaint of record. A schedule may be modified upon a showing of good cause. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b). Good cause exists when the moving party demonstrates that it cannot meet the deadline despite

  5. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  6. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,304 times   558 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party