Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons

Holding that § 1367 "applies with equal force to cases removed to federal court as to cases initially filed there; a removed case is necessarily one 'of which the district courts . . . have original jurisdiction.'"

Medimmune, Inc. v. GenenTech, Inc.

Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"

Linda R. S. v. Richard D

Holding that a mother lacked standing to seek an injunction to force the prosecution of her child’s father for failing to pay child support, reasoning that because prosecution would result only in the father being jailed, it was overly "speculative" whether an injunction would result in future child support payments

Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine

Holding that the district court erred when it enjoined a nonparty that was never determined to be in active concert with a defendant

Public Citizen v. Department of Justice

Holding that plaintiff advocacy organizations' inability to obtain information that Congress made subject to disclosure under the Federal Advisory Committee Act "constitutes a sufficiently distinct injury to provide standing to sue"

Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar

Holding that a minimum fee schedule enforced by the Virginia state bar did not fall within the Parker exception because the fee schedule was not mandated by the Virginia Supreme Court and thus it could not "fairly be said that the State of Virginia through its Supreme Court Rules required the anticompetitive activities"

Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLC

Holding that contempt has to be proved by clear and convincing evidence

Parks Rec. California v. Bazaar Del Mundo

Holding that the advertising must be "of a nature and extent such as to create an association of the term with the user's goods "

Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley Lab

Holding that unauthorized employer testing for sensitive medical information violates employees' right to informational privacy

Int'l Fed'n of Prof'l & Tech. Eng'rs v. Superior Court

Finding a "strong public interest in knowing how the government spends its money"

Section 26 - Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs

Authorizing injunctive relief against "threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws"

Section 11120 - Legislative intent; short title

In section 11120, the act has declared since its enactment as follows: "It is the public policy of this state that public agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business and the proceedings of public agencies be conducted openly so that the public may remain informed. [¶]... [I]t is the intent of the law that actions of state agencies be taken openly and that their deliberation be conducted openly."

Section 11130 - Stopping or preventing violations of article; court order requiring audio record of closed session

In section 11130, the act, as originally enacted, provided: "Any interested person may commence an action either by mandamus or injunction for the purpose of stopping or preventing violations or threatened violations of" the act "by members of" a "state agency."

Section 13995.65 - Committees established by industry categories; resolution; industry segment allocation; assessment bills; appeal of assessment; passing assessment to customers; assessment for business with revenue in more than one category