11 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 260,142 times 281 Legal Analyses
Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside
578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 14,340 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux
481 U.S. 41 (1987) Cited 3,723 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that civil enforcement scheme codified at § 502 is not to be supplemented by state law remedies
Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak Company
113 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997) Cited 449 times
Holding that we review the record in its entirety
Physicians Multispecialty v. Hlt. Care Plan
371 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 109 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that anti-assignment provision deprived healthcare provider of statutory standing for ERISA claim
Cohen v. Independence Blue Cross
820 F. Supp. 2d 594 (D.N.J. 2011) Cited 48 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations that an insurer made direct payments to an insured and ignored a healthcare provider’s appeal did not constitute a waiver
Paul Kadair, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America
694 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1983) Cited 112 times
Holding that a Rule 56(f) request for discovery can be denied if discovery is dilatorily sought
Somerset v. Horizon Blue Cross
345 N.J. Super. 410 (App. Div. 2001) Cited 43 times
Holding anti-assignment clause "valid and enforceable to prevent assignment by subscribers of policy benefit payments to non-participating medical providers without [insurer]'s consent"
Givaudan Fragrances Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
227 N.J. 322 (N.J. 2017) Cited 16 times
Holding "once an insured loss has occurred, an anti-assignment clause in an occurrence policy may not provide a basis for an insurer's declination of coverage based on the insured's assignment of the right to invoke policy coverage for that loss"
Ob-Gyn v. Blue Cross
219 Neb. 199 (Neb. 1985) Cited 39 times
In OB-GYN v. Blue Cross, 219 Neb. 199, 202, 361 N.W.2d 550, 553 (1985), we noted that "a declaratory judgment action is sui generis and may involve questions of both law and equity.
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,753 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

Shah v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey et al

11 Cited authorities

Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"

Holding that civil enforcement scheme codified at § 502 is not to be supplemented by state law remedies

Holding that we review the record in its entirety

Holding that anti-assignment provision deprived healthcare provider of statutory standing for ERISA claim

Holding that allegations that an insurer made direct payments to an insured and ignored a healthcare provider’s appeal did not constitute a waiver

Holding that a Rule 56(f) request for discovery can be denied if discovery is dilatorily sought

Holding anti-assignment clause "valid and enforceable to prevent assignment by subscribers of policy benefit payments to non-participating medical providers without [insurer]'s consent"

Holding "once an insured loss has occurred, an anti-assignment clause in an occurrence policy may not provide a basis for an insurer's declination of coverage based on the insured's assignment of the right to invoke policy coverage for that loss"

In OB-GYN v. Blue Cross, 219 Neb. 199, 202, 361 N.W.2d 550, 553 (1985), we noted that "a declaratory judgment action is sui generis and may involve questions of both law and equity.

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system