§Why CasetextPricing

SFA Systems, LLC v. Infor Global Solutions

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for Protective Order

4 Cited authorities

  1. Baine v. General Motors Corp.

    141 F.R.D. 328 (M.D. Ala. 1991)   Cited 85 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, where there were better, alternative sources of testimony, deposing corporate vice president would be oppressive, inconvenient and burdensome

  2. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Primary Industries Corp.

    92 Civ. 6313 (PNL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 1993)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that "it may be appropriate to preclude a . . . deposition of a highly-placed executive" while allowing other witnesses with the same knowledge to be questioned

  3. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  4. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"