§Why CasetextPricing

Seneca v. JBI Inc. et al

RESPONSE to Motion re Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Responses to Request for Production and Interrogatories and Deem Request for Admissions Admitted

7 Cited authorities

  1. Brook Village North Associates v. General Elec

    686 F.2d 66 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that defendant's failure to respond to a request for admission that included letters detailing reparation costs conclusively established damages

  2. Smith v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta

    837 F.2d 1575 (11th Cir. 1988)   Cited 115 times
    Holding that a bank reporting information solely on its own experience with one of its customers was not acting as a "consumer reporting agency" within the meaning of the FCRA

  3. Wouters v. Martin County

    9 F.3d 924 (11th Cir. 1993)   Cited 83 times
    Reversing Rule 37(b) dismissal

  4. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. v. United Fabrics Int'l, Inc.

    896 F. Supp. 2d 223 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that registration of purportedly unpublished collection was invalid with respect to previously published designs because error was "material" and not "technical" in nature

  5. Burger v. Hartley

    896 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (S.D. Fla. 2012)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that false representation that third-party already owned $20 million worth of securities in automotive company was material

  6. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,110 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems

  7. Rule 36 - Requests for Admission

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 36   Cited 6,286 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Noting that facts admitted pursuant to a Rule 36 discovery request are "conclusively established unless the court, on motion, permits the admission to be withdrawn or amended"