§Why CasetextPricing

Securities and Exchange Commission v. WG Trading Investors, L.P. et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 682 MOTION to Approve Ninth Joint Application of the Receiver, Frandzel Robins Bloom & Csato, L.C., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, and Silverman Acampora LLP, for Allowance of Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred During the Period January 1,. Document

7 Cited authorities

  1. Securities and Exchange Com'n v. Elliott

    953 F.2d 1560 (11th Cir. 1992)   Cited 258 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by disallowing tracing, when allowing a defrauded investor to recoup his entire investment would elevate his position over that of similarly situated victims, thereby creating an inequitable result

  2. S.E.C. v. Byers

    590 F. Supp. 2d 637 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 53 times
    Finding an hourly rate of $250 to be reasonable for a receiver in 2008

  3. Gaskill v. Gordon

    27 F.3d 248 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 36 times
    Prioritizing a receiver's lien for fees over a preexisting mortgage where the mortgagee acquiesced in the receivership

  4. Securities Exch. Com'n v. Fifth Ave. Coach Lines

    364 F. Supp. 1220 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 54 times

    No. 67 Civ. 4182. October 16, 1973. S. Hazard Gillespie, New York City, Trustee, Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver Jacobson, New York City, for Trustee; Leon Silverman, Sheldon Raab, New York City, of counsel. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen Hamilton, New York City, for Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.; Edmund H. Kerr, New York City, of counsel. Roy M. Cohn, pro se. ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge. This application for final allowances of counsel fees and disbursements represents

  5. Gasser v. Infanti Intern., Inc.

    358 F. Supp. 2d 176 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 7 times

    No. 03-CV-6413 (ILG). March 2, 2005. Alex Spizz, Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz Johns, P.C., New York City, for Plaintiffs. Jay W. Freiberg, Marie A. Tieri, Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman, New York City, for Infanti defendants. Helen A. Nau, Pitney Hardin LLP, Morristown, NJ, for defendant Amboy National Bank. Stan L. Goldberg, Platzer, Swergold, Karlin, Levine, Goldberg Jaslow, LLP, New York City, for Receiver Sanders W. Gropper. George E. Scharpf, Old Bridge, NJ, pro se. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GLASSER, District

  6. Sec. Exch. Com'n v. W.L. Moody Co., Bank.

    374 F. Supp. 465 (S.D. Tex. 1974)   Cited 26 times
    Holding receiver's and receivership team's qualifications relevant to fee awarded

  7. Section 6b - Contracts designed to defraud or mislead

    7 U.S.C. § 6b   Cited 526 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Targeting fraudulent conduct “in connection with any order to make, or the making of, any contract of sale of any commodity”