§Why CasetextPricing

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank Ltd et al

REPLY in Support of Receiver's re: 669 MOTION for Approval of Second Interim Fee Application and Brief in Support

5 Cited authorities

  1. Northumberland v. Phila. Reading C. I

    131 F.2d 562 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 9 times
    In Northumberland County v. Philadelphia and Reading Coal & Iron Co., 131 F.2d 562 (3d Cir. 1942), the court of appeals examined this exception in the context of a corporate-reorganization bankruptcy appeal; the case did not involve validity of a tax-sale title.

  2. Parsons v. Detroit Canada Tunnel Co.

    15 F. Supp. 986 (E.D. Mich. 1936)   Cited 6 times
    In Parsons et al. v. Detroit Canada Tunnel Company, D.C., 15 F. Supp. 986, 996, the Tunnel Company was in reorganization proceedings in the Federal Court and the Court said: "It follows, therefore, that the present trustee, who is in control of the property in question, can only pay the taxes here involved after the amount thereof has been fixed by this court in these receivership proceedings."

  3. Broadway Trust Co. v. Dill

    17 F.2d 486 (3d Cir. 1927)   Cited 3 times

    No. 3544. February 17, 1927. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; William N. Runyon, Judge. In the matter of the receivership of the Hanover Farms Company; William L. Dill, receiver. From an order for the public sale of real estate, free and divested of liens, the Broadway Trust Company, trustee under the mortgage, appeals. Affirmed. Harvey F. Carr, of Camden, N.J., for appellant. Carl A. Feick and Pitney, Hardin Skinner, all of Newark, N.J., for appellee

  4. Cross v. Leverich Realty Corporation

    41 F.2d 797 (E.D.N.Y. 1930)

    No. 3751. June 3, 1930. Lewis, Marks Kanter, of Brooklyn, N.Y. (Nathan Marks and Julius L. Rassner, both of Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for receiver. I.J. Ginsberg, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for Max Oestreicher. In Equity. Proceeding by John J. Cross against the Leverich Realty Corporation and others. On motion by receiver for confirmation of report of special master and on motion of Max Oestreicher, on exceptions to special master's report. Exceptions overruled, and special master's report confirmed.

  5. Section 959 - Trustees and receivers suable; management; State laws

    28 U.S.C. § 959   Cited 722 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a trustee to manage the estate in accordance with applicable law