9 Cited authorities

Register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.
356 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2004) Cited 545 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a company that scraped a competitor's website to obtain data for marketing purposes likely committed trespass to chattels, because scraping could—although it did not yet—cause physical harm to the plaintiff's computer servers
Light v. Centel Cellular Co. of Texas
883 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. 1994) Cited 207 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that an illusory promise of performance invalidates a contract
U.S. v. Chestman
947 F.2d 551 (2d Cir. 1991) Cited 206 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a knowing breach of fiduciary duty may constitute a fraudulent scheme for purposes of the federal mail fraud statutes
Ski River Development v. McCalla
167 S.W.3d 121 (Tex. App. 2005) Cited 114 times
Holding that, where the claims are intertwined "the party suing for attorney's fees may recover the entire amount covering all claims"
Paciwest v. Warner Alan
266 S.W.3d 559 (Tex. App. 2008) Cited 77 times
Finding trial court erred by determining that that appellees were precluded from presenting evidence at trial as to the damages they incurred as a result of other party's delay in performing its obligations under the contract
TMC Worldwide, L.P. v. Gray
178 S.W.3d 29 (Tex. App. 2005) Cited 35 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding covenant not to compete unenforceable because at-will marketing consultant received customer lists one year after signing employment agreement
U.S. v. Cassese
273 F. Supp. 2d 481 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) Cited 11 times
Finding an unsigned confidentiality agreement does not create a duty of trust and confidence under the misappropriation theory
Franks v. Brookshire Bros., Inc.
986 S.W.2d 375 (Tex. App. 1999) Cited 5 times
No. 09-97-183 CV. Submitted November 19, 1998. Decided February 18, 1999. Appeal from the 217th District Court, Angelina County, David V. Wilson, J. Before BURGESS, STOVER and HILL, JJ. The Honorable John Hill, sitting by assignment pursuant to TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 74.003(b) (Vernon 1988). OPINION JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned). Mark Franks appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing in his personal injury action against his employer, Brookshire Brothers, Inc., an action resulting from
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,753 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cuban

9 Cited authorities

Holding that a company that scraped a competitor's website to obtain data for marketing purposes likely committed trespass to chattels, because scraping could—although it did not yet—cause physical harm to the plaintiff's computer servers

Holding that an illusory promise of performance invalidates a contract

Holding that a knowing breach of fiduciary duty may constitute a fraudulent scheme for purposes of the federal mail fraud statutes

Holding that, where the claims are intertwined "the party suing for attorney's fees may recover the entire amount covering all claims"

Finding trial court erred by determining that that appellees were precluded from presenting evidence at trial as to the damages they incurred as a result of other party's delay in performing its obligations under the contract

Holding covenant not to compete unenforceable because at-will marketing consultant received customer lists one year after signing employment agreement

Finding an unsigned confidentiality agreement does not create a duty of trust and confidence under the misappropriation theory

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system