23 Cited authorities

  1. Societe Nat. Ind. Aero. v. U.S. Dist. Court

    482 U.S. 522 (1987)   Cited 594 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Hague Convention did not deprive the District Court of the jurisdiction it would otherwise possess to order a foreign national party before it to produce evidence physically located within a signatory nation"
  2. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants

    959 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 567 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an instrumentality of a foreign nation must respond to discovery about its worldwide assets and that it could not use the FSIA to conceal its assets from the district court
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Fayda

    14 Civ. 9792 (WHP) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2015)   Cited 73 times
    Compelling production of bank records and tax returns
  4. Henry v. Morgan's Hotel Grp., Inc.

    15-CV-1789 (ER) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2016)   Cited 61 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the Oppenheimer Court's definition of relevance is still applicable after the 2015 amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)
  5. Strauss v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.

    249 F.R.D. 429 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 45 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the Antiterrorism Act of 1992 provides civil remedies for United State nationals injured in international terrorist attacks
  6. Robertson v. Magazine

    14 Civ. 6759 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2015)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that proportionality has been a limit on discovery since the 1983 amendments to Rule 26
  7. Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.

    910 F. Supp. 2d 548 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 27 times
    Finding the MOJ's past practices validate concerns that Hague Convention requests are not viable alternative to subpoena
  8. United States v. First National City Bank

    396 F.2d 897 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 86 times
    Finding strong interest in grand jury investigation of antitrust violations
  9. British Int'l Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Seguros La Republica, S.A.

    90 Civ. 2370 (JFK)(FM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2000)   Cited 27 times
    Finding expert testimony, unsupported by any case law, insufficient evidence from which to accept either parties' understanding of the law
  10. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Arg.

    05 Civ. 2434 (TPG) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2013)   Cited 7 times
    Granting motion to compel
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 96,086 times   662 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Section 362 - Automatic stay

    11 U.S.C. § 362   Cited 29,549 times   175 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that cause exists to lift the stay because no bankruptcy purpose would be served by keeping the stay in place
  13. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,252 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."
  14. Section 77e - Prohibitions relating to interstate commerce and the mails

    15 U.S.C. § 77e   Cited 1,862 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Requiring registration statement before selling securities
  15. Section 77d - Exempted transactions

    15 U.S.C. § 77d   Cited 469 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Exempting "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering"