39 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,210 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Scott v. Harris

    550 U.S. 372 (2007)   Cited 11,723 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is at least sometimes reasonable for an officer to intentionally collide with a suspect's vehicle during a pursuit
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 26,290 times   225 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

    526 U.S. 137 (1999)   Cited 12,614 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
  5. Tolan v. Cotton

    572 U.S. 650 (2014)   Cited 4,936 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in determining whether a dispute about a material fact is "genuine," the trial court must not weigh the evidence and instead must draw all reasonable inference in the nonmoving party's favor
  6. US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett

    535 U.S. 391 (2002)   Cited 1,072 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "reasonable accommodation" in ADA means more than just effective accommodation
  7. Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club

    346 F.3d 514 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 3,437 times
    Holding that the fact that products depicted an infringing logo did not establish a connection between the infringement and the revenue from the sale of those products
  8. School Bd. of Nassau County v. Arline

    480 U.S. 273 (1987)   Cited 1,026 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that teacher with long dormant disease of tuberculosis that had recently reoccurred was "handicapped" within meaning of Rehabilitation Act
  9. Dennis v. Columbia Colleton Med. Ctr., Inc.

    290 F.3d 639 (4th Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,183 times
    Holding plaintiff showed pretext where an employer offered more reasons at trial than in discovery
  10. Libertarian Party of Va. v. Judd

    718 F.3d 308 (4th Cir. 2013)   Cited 1,069 times
    Holding that "[s]trict scrutiny is the proper standard" to apply to state-residency requirement to circulate candidate-nominating petitions
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,736 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,664 times   255 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard
  13. Section 12112 - Discrimination

    42 U.S.C. § 12112   Cited 13,513 times   159 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing failure to accommodate as form of discrimination
  14. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,317 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims
  15. Section 12111 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 12111   Cited 8,026 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition of "person" in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e for purposes of Title I of the ADA
  16. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,335 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"
  17. Appendix to Part 1630 - Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1630 app to Part 1630   Cited 859 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity entails the nature and severity of the impairment; the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and the permanent or long term impact