6 Cited authorities

  1. Parker v. D.C

    478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that whether the plaintiff actually had a Second Amendment right to bear arms was irrelevant to whether he had standing to challenge a law impeding that right
  2. Ord v. District of Columbia

    587 F.3d 1136 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 58 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that a plaintiff had standing to bring a preenforcement challenge where "his complaint and affidavit c[ould] only be understood to mean that if the threat of arrest [were] removed, he intend[ed] to travel to D.C. while armed"
  3. Seegars v. Gonzales

    396 F.3d 1248 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 54 times
    Holding that plaintiffs who "allege no prior threats against them or any characteristics indicating an especially high probability of enforcement against them" lacked pre-enforcement standing
  4. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  5. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 95,100 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  6. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 63,597 times   187 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"