Employee sued her former employer and union for breach of collective bargaining agreement and breach of duty of fair representation. Defendants moved to dismiss on grounds that plaintiff failed to serve process within 120 days of filing complaint and plaintiff cross-moved for order enlarging time to serve process. The District Court, Sprizzo, J., held that it would exercise its discretionary authority to extend time period for service of process. Motion to dismiss denied. Michael O'Neill, New York
3:03CR00032 (DJS) January 8, 2004 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DOMINIC SQUATRITO, District Judge The United States has motioned this court to reconsider its ruling [doc. #35] granting defendant Gary Mills's motion to suppress statements he made to New Haven Police detectives on June 18, 2002. The Government raises two variations of a single argument in support of its motion. First, the government re-states a previous claim that the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel had not attached at the time