§Why CasetextPricing

Schlafly v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company et al

REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion

11 Cited authorities

  1. State Farm Fire Cas. Co. v. Tashire

    386 U.S. 523 (1967)   Cited 741 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1335 “require only ‘minimal diversity,’ that is, diversity of citizenship between two or more claimants, without regard to the circumstance that other rival claimants may be co-citizens” (footnote omitted)

  2. Hudson v. Chicago

    228 Ill. 2d 462 (Ill. 2008)   Cited 301 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding that when the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit, it "terminated in its entirety and all final orders became immediately appealable"

  3. Nylife Distributors, Inc. v. Adherence Group

    72 F.3d 371 (3d Cir. 1995)   Cited 108 times
    Holding that a "discretionary standard . . . governs the district court's decision to dismiss an action commenced under the interpleader statute during the pendency of parallel state court proceedings" and discussing forum shopping in this context only

  4. Borrovic v. Attorney General of the U.S.

    435 F. App'x 144 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 9 times
    Emphasizing that "a formal claim against the policy or suit by [a claimant] was not required"

  5. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Neu

    Civil Action No. 17-3475 (D.N.J. May. 24, 2017)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 17-3475 05-24-2017 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. RICHARD W. NEU, et al., Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. NOT FOR PUBLICATION OPINION John Michael Vazquez , U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court on the Order to Show Cause for Interpleader Relief filed by Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"). Chase seeks an order (1) directing it to place the funds at issue into the Federal Registry, (2) discharging Chase from all further liability with respect

  6. Gallagher v. Roi

    2015 Ill. App. 140786 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015)   Cited 2 times

    No. 1-14-0786 03-12-2015 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUIS ROI, Defendant-Appellee. JUSTICE COBBS delivered the judgment of the court. NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County. No. 14-CH-3232 Honorable Neil Cohen, Judge, presiding. JUSTICE COBBS delivered the judgment of the court. Justices Howse and Ellis

  7. Bierman v. Marcus

    246 F.2d 200 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 49 times
    Finding no jurisdiction where there was no real and reasonable fear of multiple claims

  8. National Bank of Detroit v. Shelden

    730 F.2d 421 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 82-1737, 82-1905. Argued December 1, 1983. Decided March 8, 1984. Peter J. Cipollini, Charles E. Wilson, Jr. (argued), Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff. Michael Golob (argued), Ivan E. Barris, Detroit, Mich., for defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Before JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. This litigation began with the filing of a complaint in the nature of an interpleader

  9. Escoett v. Aldecress Country Club

    16 N.J. 438 (N.J. 1954)   Cited 23 times

    Argued September 20 and 27, 1954 — Decided November 8, 1954. Appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division. Mr. Samuel M. Coombs, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour Dwyer, attorneys; Mr. Robert R. Whelan, on the brief). Mr. Milton Rosenkranz argued the cause for the respondents Donald J. Flamm and Donmor Realty Corporation; Messrs. Losche Losche, attorneys for respondents Aldecress Country Club, et al., Mr. George F. Losche, of counsel; Messrs. Eisenstein Eisenstein

  10. Section 1335 - Interpleader

    28 U.S.C. § 1335   Cited 2,223 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting original jurisdiction to the district courts in "any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader" "if two or more adverse claimants . . . are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property" as shall have been pleaded into court

  11. Section 735 ILCS 5/11-101 - Temporary restraining order

    735 ILCS 5/11-101   Cited 62 times

    No temporary restraining order shall be granted without notice to the adverse party unless it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant before notice can be served and a hearing had thereon. Every temporary restraining order granted without notice shall be indorsed with the date and hour of signing; shall be filed forthwith in the clerk's office; shall define the injury and