473 U.S. 479 (1985) Cited 4,236 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the fact that a statute can be "applied in situations not expressly anticipated by Congress does not demonstrate ambiguity. It demonstrates breadth."
Holding that the RICO bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to sue under securities laws because the plaintiff did not buy or sell securities
Finding fourth factor satisfied where "[a]lthough Defendants used the [work] for a commercial purpose in the sense that they profited from copying it, they did not actually sell the copies to willing buyers" but instead to "generate moral outrage ... and thus stimulate monetary support for their political cause"
Stating a third cause of action for “violation of Plaintiffs' First Amendment Right because the policy is unconstitutionally vague and denies due process”
Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 71-1.001 Rulemaking Authority 14.204(6) FS. Law Implemented 14.204, 282.201, 282.318 FS. New 7-13-09, Repealed by Chapter 2014-221, Laws of Florida, 7-1-14.