41 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,142 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 273,590 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Heck v. Humphrey

    512 U.S. 477 (1994)   Cited 29,826 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Section 1983 plaintiff may not seek damages for an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or sentence unless the conviction or sentence has been invalidated
  4. Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police

    491 U.S. 58 (1989)   Cited 24,727 times
    Holding that official capacity state officer suits for prospective injunctive relief are suits against a "person" under § 1983 even though a "State" is not a "person" under that statute
  5. Preiser v. Rodriguez

    411 U.S. 475 (1973)   Cited 18,413 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even if the state prisoners' requested relief had "merely shortened the length of their confinement . . . their suits would still have been within the core of habeas corpus in attacking the very duration of their physical confinement itself"
  6. Younger v. Harris

    401 U.S. 37 (1971)   Cited 17,139 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was improper for the district court in that case to enjoin a state prosecution against Younger, in light of "the national policy forbidding federal courts to stay or enjoin pending state court proceedings except under special circumstances"
  7. Allen v. McCurry

    449 U.S. 90 (1980)   Cited 5,811 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under res judicata, parties may not "relitigat[e] issues that were or could have been raised" in a prior action
  8. Jett v. Dallas Independent School District

    491 U.S. 701 (1989)   Cited 3,181 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 1983 is "the exclusive federal remedy for violation of" section 1981 "by state governmental units"
  9. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education

    465 U.S. 75 (1984)   Cited 3,580 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that petitioner's state-court judgment in litigation [had] the same claim preclusive effect in federal court that the judgment would have in the . . . state courts"
  10. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore

    439 U.S. 322 (1979)   Cited 4,269 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 496,982 times   701 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 354,229 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  13. Section 2254 - State custody; remedies in Federal courts

    28 U.S.C. § 2254   Cited 207,343 times   341 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a determination of a factual issue made by a State court shall be presumed to be correct" and "[t]he applicant shall have the burden of rebutting the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence"
  14. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 112,111 times   198 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"
  15. Section 1738 - State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings; full faith and credit

    28 U.S.C. § 1738   Cited 7,588 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Referring to "[t]he Acts of the legislature" in the full faith and credit context
  16. Section 18.2-361 - Crimes against nature; penalty

    Va. Code § 18.2-361   Cited 39 times

    A. If any person carnally knows in any manner any brute animal or voluntarily submits to such carnal knowledge, he is guilty of a Class 6 felony. B. Any person who performs or causes to be performed cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, or anal intercourse upon or by his daughter or granddaughter, son or grandson, brother or sister, or father or mother is guilty of a Class 5 felony. However, if a parent or grandparent commits any such act with his child or grandchild and such child or grandchild is at

  17. Section 8.01-389 - Judicial records as evidence; full faith and credit; recitals in deeds, deeds of trust, and mortgages; "records" defined; certification

    Va. Code § 8.01-389   Cited 8 times
    Requiring every court in the Commonwealth to give the "records of courts not of this Commonwealth the full faith and credit given to them in the courts of the jurisdiction from whence they come"