§Why CasetextPricing

Santana et al v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: 48 MOTION to Dismiss of Take-Two interactive Software, Inc. to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, to strike the class allegations. . Document

54 Cited authorities

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

    578 U.S. 330 (2016)   Cited 7,409 times   437 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statutory violation, without more, did not give rise to Article III standing

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,840 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Env't

    523 U.S. 83 (1998)   Cited 10,740 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court "act ultra vires" when it assumes "hypothetical jurisdiction" in order to rule on the merits

  4. Kyllo v. United States

    533 U.S. 27 (2001)   Cited 1,612 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from a home was a search

  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey

    505 U.S. 833 (1992)   Cited 1,859 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional

  6. Lawrence v. Texas

    539 U.S. 558 (2003)   Cited 1,153 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding statute that criminalizes two persons of same sex engaging in intimate sexual conduct unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment

  7. U.S. Dept. of Justice v. Reporters Committee

    489 U.S. 749 (1989)   Cited 1,918 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that disclosure of "[o]fficial information that sheds light on an agency's performance of its statutory duties falls squarely within [FOIA's] statutory purpose"

  8. Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman

    455 U.S. 363 (1982)   Cited 2,029 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff organization "has had to devote significant resources to identify and counteract the defendant's" illegal practices was sufficient to confer standing to the organization in its own right at the pleading stage

  9. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.

    527 U.S. 815 (1999)   Cited 931 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a fairness hearing under Rule 23(e) is no substitute for rigorous adherence to those provisions of the Rule designed to protect absentees"

  10. Thompson v. N. Am. Stainless

    562 U.S. 170 (2011)   Cited 572 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "third-party reprisals" can amount in some circumstances to retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq .

  11. Section 740 ILCS 14/1 - Short Title

    740 ILCS 14/1   Cited 242 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Defining “[b]iometric identifier” as “a retina or iris scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or scan of hand or face geometry”

  12. Section 740 ILCS 14/15 - Retention; Collection; Disclosure; Destruction

    740 ILCS 14/15   Cited 212 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Requiring “private entit[ies]” to comply with BIPA provisions

  13. Section 740 ILCS 110/1

    740 ILCS 110/1   Cited 129 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act". 740 ILCS 110/1 P.A. 80-1508.

  14. Section 740 ILCS 14/5 - Legislative Findings; Intent

    740 ILCS 14/5   Cited 93 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing public's wariness of use of biometrics and need for regulation for public welfare, security and safety

  15. Section 740 ILCS 110/10 - Disclosure in civil, criminal, and other proceedings

    740 ILCS 110/10   Cited 92 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that mental records are discoverable if a plaintiff "introduces his mental condition or any aspect of his services received for such condition as an element of his claim or defense"

  16. Section 765 ILCS 1075/10 - Recognition of right of publicity

    765 ILCS 1075/10   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing right of publicity encompassing "[t]he right to control and to choose whether and how to use an individual's identity for commercial purposes"

  17. Section 740 ILCS 110/15

    740 ILCS 110/15   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Any person aggrieved by a violation of this Act may sue for damages, an injunction, or other appropriate relief. Reasonable attorney's fees and costs may be awarded to the successful plaintiff in any action under this Act. 740 ILCS 110/15 P.A. 80-1508.

  18. Section 220 ILCS 5/22-501 - [Renumbered from 220 ILCS 5/70-501] Customer Service and Privacy Protection

    220 ILCS 5/22-501   Cited 4 times

    All cable or video providers in this State shall comply with the following customer service requirements and privacy protections. The provisions of this Act shall not apply to an incumbent cable operator prior to January 1, 2008. For purposes of this paragraph, an incumbent cable operator means a person or entity that provided cable services in a particular area under a franchise agreement with a local unit of government pursuant to Section 11-42-11 of the Illinois Municipal Code or Section 5-1095