§Why CasetextPricing

Sanchez v. MTV Networks et al

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW /Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Reply to Plaintiff's Request for "Other Relief". Document

25 Cited authorities

  1. Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila

    542 U.S. 200 (2004)   Cited 2,702 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states cannot create new causes of action that conflict with ERISA's " ‘interlocking, interrelated, and interdependent remedial scheme,’ " located in § 502 of ERISA

  2. United Student Aid Funds v. Espinosa

    559 U.S. 260 (2010)   Cited 1,840 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rule 60(b) applies "in the rare instance where a judgment is premised . . . on a violation of due process that deprives a party of notice or the opportunity to be heard"

  3. Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor

    481 U.S. 58 (1987)   Cited 4,445 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1144 preempts state common law claims

  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck

    471 U.S. 202 (1985)   Cited 2,715 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 301 does not preempt state law claims based on non-negotiable, independent rights

  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.

    486 U.S. 399 (1988)   Cited 2,059 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a retaliatory discharge claim was not preempted because the elements of the state tort did not necessitate interpretation of a labor contract

  6. Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

    390 U.S. 557 (1968)   Cited 1,109 times
    Holding claims within the scope of section 301 of the LMRA completely preempted

  7. Electrical Workers v. Hechler

    481 U.S. 851 (1987)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employee's negligence claim against her union was preempted because, unlike an employer, the union owed plaintiff a duty only by “accepting a duty of care through contractual arrangement” of a CBA

  8. Nemaizer v. Baker

    793 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 1,336 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice was an adjudication on the merits that barred further federal court proceedings

  9. Textron Lycoming Recip. Engine Div. v. Auto. Workers

    523 U.S. 653 (1998)   Cited 203 times
    Holding that [s]ection 301 jurisdiction does not lie where plaintiff union sought declaratory judgment that a CBA was voidable

  10. Stoll v. Gottlieb

    305 U.S. 165 (1938)   Cited 797 times
    Holding that “[a]fter a party has his day in court, with opportunity to present his evidence and his view of the law, a collateral attack upon the decision as to jurisdiction there rendered merely retries the issue previously determined”

  11. Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60   Cited 53,518 times   146 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief from the operation of a judgment

  12. Section 185 - Suits by and against labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 185   Cited 14,528 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal district courts jurisdiction over breach of contract claims arising out of collective bargaining contracts

  13. Section 3 - Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration

    9 U.S.C. § 3   Cited 7,050 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Providing for a stay of judicial proceedings on "issue referable to arbitration"