§Why CasetextPricing

Sanchez et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

MOTION in Limine Wells Fargo's Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence of Certain Exhibits and Other Evidence Relating to Other Bank Practices

8 Cited authorities

  1. Tennison v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc.

    244 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 143 times
    Holding that litigants who did not attempt to introduce testimony at trial cannot challenge exclusion of that evidence on appeal

  2. Rogers v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

    922 F.2d 1426 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 65 times
    Holding that improper violation of pretrial order by admitting excluded evidence was harmless error

  3. Trans-Tec Asia v. M/V Harmony Container

    435 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (C.D. Cal. 2005)   Cited 21 times
    Finding that a choice of law provision materially altered the contract because the contract had significant contacts with more than two jurisdictions

  4. United States v. an Article of Drug

    661 F.2d 742 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Rejecting argument that scope of injunction was too broad and that it was "impossible to tell from the general verdict which use or uses the jury found impermissible," explaining that "the evidence was also heard by the judge, and the judge, not the jury, determined the scope of the injunction based upon the judge's view of the facts established by the evidence."

  5. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,912 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  6. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 22,522 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks

  7. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,102 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  8. Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 402   Cited 6,657 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Providing relevant evidence is admissible unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court