§Why CasetextPricing

San Francisco Aesthetics and Laser Medicine Incorporated v. The Presidio Trust

MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses From Plaintiffs

22 Cited authorities

  1. Roberts v. United States Jaycees

    468 U.S. 609 (1984)   Cited 2,014 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"

  2. Mcconnell v. F.E.C.

    540 U.S. 93 (2003)   Cited 607 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding BCRA survived exacting scrutiny, given the “important state interests” in “providing the electorate with information, deterring actual corruption and avoiding any appearance thereof, and gathering the data necessary to enforce more substantive electioneering restrictions”

  3. Boy Scouts of America v. Dale

    530 U.S. 640 (2000)   Cited 479 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Boy Scouts' freedom of expressive association was violated by a state law requiring the organization to admit a homosexual scoutmaster

  4. N. A. A. C. P. v. Alabama

    357 U.S. 449 (1958)   Cited 1,960 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[c]ompelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs" may violate the First Amendment

  5. Dallas v. Stanglin

    490 U.S. 19 (1989)   Cited 537 times
    Holding that dance-hall patrons who "com[e] together to engage in recreational dancing" are not engaged in expressive association

  6. Soto v. City of Concord

    162 F.R.D. 603 (N.D. Cal. 1995)   Cited 1,235 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a relevant matter is "any matter that bears on, or that reasonably could lead to other matters that could bear on, any issue that is or may be in the case."

  7. U.S. v. Adlman

    134 F.3d 1194 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 633 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that documents are protected when "the document can fairly be said to have been prepared or obtained because of the prospect of litigation"

  8. Govas v. Chalmers

    965 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 512 times

    No. 91-1687. Argued January 16, 1992. Decided June 2, 1992. Daniel F. Webb, Chicago, Ill. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant. Ronald L. Marmer, Howard R. Barron, Howard S. Suskin (argued), James A. Geocaris, Jenner Block, William M. McErlean, Rudnick Wolfe, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Before BAUER, Chief Judge, KANNE, Circuit Judge, and WOOD, JR., Senior Circuit Judge. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Senior Circuit

  9. Safeco of America v. Rawstron

    181 F.R.D. 441 (C.D. Cal. 1998)   Cited 159 times
    Holding interrogatory that seeks facts about multiple requests for admissions should be counted as a separate interrogatory for each request.

  10. Directv, Inc. v. Puccinelli

    224 F.R.D. 677 (D. Kan. 2004)   Cited 132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff "may not merely refer Defendants to other pleadings or its disclosures hoping that Defendants will be able to glean the requested information from them"

  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 96,038 times   662 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  12. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 46,335 times   322 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  13. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 10,976 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)

  14. Section 1320d-6 - Wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information

    42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6   Cited 298 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting use and disclosure of "individually identifiable health information" without authorization

  15. Section 1320 - Approval of certain projects

    42 U.S.C. § 1320   Cited 232 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Proscribing fraud related to federal health care programs

  16. Appendix A to Subpart C of Part 164 - Security Standards: Matrix

    45 C.F.R. § 164 app A to Subpart C of Part 164   Cited 108 times   27 Legal Analyses

    Standards Sections Implementation Specifications (R) = Required, (A) = Addressable Administrative Safeguards Security Management Process 164.308(a)(1) Risk Analysis (R) Risk Management (R) Sanction Policy (R) Information System Activity Review (R) Assigned Security Responsibility 164.308(a)(2) (R) Workforce Security 164.308(a)(3) Authorization and/or Supervision (A) Workforce Clearance Procedure Termination Procedures (A) Information Access Management 164.308(a)(4) Isolating Health care Clearinghouse