§Why CasetextPricing

Salinas v. Kroger Texas, L.P.

RESPONSE in Opposition to 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment

25 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,092 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,508 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,176 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"

  4. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan

    536 U.S. 101 (2002)   Cited 10,314 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding limitations period for hostile-work-environment claim runs from the last act composing the claim

  5. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,384 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

  6. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc.

    523 U.S. 75 (1998)   Cited 5,170 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hatever evidentiary route the plaintiff chooses to follow, he or she must always prove that the conduct at issue was not merely tinged with offensive . . . connotations"

  7. Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson

    477 U.S. 57 (1986)   Cited 6,504 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sexual harassment may be actionable under Title VII as discrimination on the basis of sex if it is sufficiently severe and pervasive

  8. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

    490 U.S. 228 (1989)   Cited 4,616 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer discriminated on the basis of sex when he "act[ed] on the basis of a belief that a woman cannot be aggressive, or that she must not be"

  9. Pegram v. Honeywell, Inc.

    361 F.3d 272 (5th Cir. 2004)   Cited 709 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claim that reassignment was "a less prestigious or desirable transfer," without more, did not establish adverse employment action

  10. E.E.O.C. v. WCM

    496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 374 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to bring a claim for discrimination because of national origin, a plaintiff need not show that the "discriminator knew the particular national origin group to which the complainant belonged," because "it is enough to show that the complainant was treated differently because of his or her foreign accent, appearance, or physical characteristics" (alteration omitted)

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,994 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5   Cited 26,973 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding charges must be made in writing, under oath, and contain all information as the Commission requires

  13. Section 2000e-1 - Exemption

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1   Cited 658 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Exempting religious employers from Title VII's prohibition against religious discrimination in hiring