§Why CasetextPricing

Safari Club International et al v. Jewell et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Intervene

7 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,840 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  2. Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp.

    429 U.S. 252 (1977)   Cited 4,288 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs need show only that "a discriminatory purpose has been a motivating factor in the decision," because, after all, "[r]arely can it be said that a legislature or administrative body operating under a broad mandate made a decision motivated solely by a single concern, or even that a particular purpose was the ‘dominant’ or ‘primary’ one."

  3. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pac. Lumber

    230 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 265 times
    Holding that under Rhodes, plaintiffs had standing to challenge the Forest Service's exclusion of certain classes of actions from procedural safeguards designed to determine the environmental impact of those actions, and that plaintiffs had an informational injury justifying standing as well, where the alleged violation prevented them from commenting on or challenging the agency's decision

  4. Physicians Assoc. v. U.S. D. H. S.

    489 F.3d 1267 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that "the only way to prevent" a finding that redressability is lacking in the third-party context is "for a court not only to invalidate [the contested agency action] but also to repudiate" it

  5. Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. United States Forest Service

    726 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Mont. 2010)   Cited 10 times
    In Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 726 F.Supp.2d 1195 (D. Mont. 2010), for example, the court evaluated a BiOp analyzing the use of chemical fire retardant to fight wildfires.

  6. Section 1531 - Congressional findings and declaration of purposes and policy

    16 U.S.C. § 1531   Cited 1,672 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Finding and declaring that "various species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the United States have been rendered extinct" while "other species ... have been so depleted in numbers that they are in danger of or threatened with extinction ...."

  7. Section 1539 - Exceptions

    16 U.S.C. § 1539   Cited 326 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the discretionary use of experimental populations in species recovery