13 Cited authorities

Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment Housing Com
43 Cal.3d 1379 (Cal. 1987) Cited 888 times
Holding that the statute did not extend to cover remedies that were “different in kind from the enumerated remedies,” because “ more reasonable reading of the phrase ‘including, but not limited to,’ ... permitting only additional corrective remedies comports with the statutory construction doctrines of ejusdem generis, expressio unius est exclusio alterius and noscitur a sociis.”
Nolan v. City of Anaheim
33 Cal.4th 335 (Cal. 2004) Cited 119 times
No. S113359 July 1, 2004 Appeal from the Superior Court of Orange County, No. 00CC03056, William F. McDonald, Judge. Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Marx and Barnes, Grancell, Lebovitz; Barnes and Reubens, Norin T. Grancell and Lawrence Kirk for Defendant and Appellant. Lemarie, Faunce, Pingel Singer, Law Office of Steven R. Pingel, Steven R. Pingel; Faunce, Singer Oatman, Edward L. Faunce and Larry J. Roberts for Plaintiff and Respondent. Peter H. Mixon, Carol McConnell and Richard B. Maness for California
Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty.
56 Cal.4th 128 (Cal. 2013) Cited 91 times 8 Legal Analyses
In Apple, the court noted that the Act made no mention of online commercial transactions, and predated the prevalence of such transactions by a decade.
Thomas v. City of Richmond
9 Cal.4th 1154 (Cal. 1995) Cited 38 times
Recognizing that " public entity, as the employer, is generally liable for the torts of an employee committed within the scope of employment if the employee is liable, " but the public entity generally is not liable if the individual employee is immune
Cequel III Communications I, LLC v. Local Agency Formation Commission of Nevada County
149 Cal.App.4th 310 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 19 times
C052238. April 3, 2007. Appeal from the Superior Court of Nevada County, No. 70226, Albert Dover, Judge. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy Bass, Richard R. Patch, Gregg M. Ficks, Sabrina L. Feve; Diamond Baker and Craig A. Diampnd for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Offices of P. Scott Browne, P. Scott Browne and Marsha A. Burch for Defendant and Respondent. Law Office of Porter Simon, Steven C. Gross; Miller, Owen Trost, Nancy C. Miller and Madeline E. Miller for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. OPINION
Yohner v. California Department of Justice
237 Cal.App.4th 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) Cited 9 times
Applying de novo standard of review to claim that law violated " 'equal protection principles' " (id. at p. 11)
Morgan v. Beaumont Police Dep't
246 Cal.App.4th 144 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 7 times
In Morgan, the court of appeal merely concluded that electronic acknowledgement of "receipt" of a policy was insufficient to satisfy the requirement that officers certify they "received, read, and understand the policy."
Brummett v. County of Sacramento
21 Cal.3d 880 (Cal. 1978) Cited 42 times
In Brummett v. County of Sacramento (1978) 21 Cal.3d 880, 883-886 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 361, 582 P.2d 952], we held that, with respect to police vehicular chases, an exception to the general rule of a public employer's derivative immunity exists under Vehicle Code section 17001, which provides: "A public entity is liable for death or injury to person... proximately caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of any motor vehicle by an employee of the public entity acting within the scope of his employment."
Nguyen v. City of Westminster
103 Cal.App.4th 1161 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 12 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Nguyen, the court "reluctantly" found the defendant city immune under the former version of section 17004.7. (Nguyen, at p. 1163, 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 388.)
Colvin v. City of Gardena
11 Cal.App.4th 1270 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992) Cited 22 times
In Colvin v. City of Gardena, supra, 11 Cal.App.4th 1270, the appellate court found a vehicle pursuit policy containing similar language, without more, to be inadequate.
Section 17004.7 - Motor vehicle pursuits by peace officers
Cal. Veh. Code § 17004.7 Cited 46 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring compliance with the training guidelines established by the POST Commission pursuant to Penal Code section 13519.8

RAMIREZ v. CITY OF GARDENA

13 Cited authorities

In Apple, the court noted that the Act made no mention of online commercial transactions, and predated the prevalence of such transactions by a decade.

Recognizing that " public entity, as the employer, is generally liable for the torts of an employee committed within the scope of employment if the employee is liable, " but the public entity generally is not liable if the individual employee is immune

Applying de novo standard of review to claim that law violated " 'equal protection principles' " (id. at p. 11)

In Morgan, the court of appeal merely concluded that electronic acknowledgement of "receipt" of a policy was insufficient to satisfy the requirement that officers certify they "received, read, and understand the policy."

In Nguyen, the court "reluctantly" found the defendant city immune under the former version of section 17004.7. (Nguyen, at p. 1163, 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 388.)

In Colvin v. City of Gardena, supra, 11 Cal.App.4th 1270, the appellate court found a vehicle pursuit policy containing similar language, without more, to be inadequate.

Requiring compliance with the training guidelines established by the POST Commission pursuant to Penal Code section 13519.8