§Why CasetextPricing

RAMIREZ v. CITY OF GARDENA

Amicus Curiae Brief of League of California Cities

7 Cited authorities

  1. Lewis v. County of Sacramento

    93 Cal.App.4th 107 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 261 times
    Lamenting failure to provide adequate record citations, but choosing to disregard noncompliance so as not to further delay the appeal

  2. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.

    133 Cal.App.4th 26 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 203 times
    Denying request for judicial notice for failure to show the "Fact Sheet" was communicated to the Legislature as a whole

  3. Yohner v. California Department of Justice

    237 Cal.App.4th 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 9 times
    Applying de novo standard of review to claim that law violated " 'equal protection principles' " (id. at p. 11)

  4. Morgan v. Beaumont Police Dep't

    246 Cal.App.4th 144 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 7 times
    In Morgan, the court of appeal merely concluded that electronic acknowledgement of "receipt" of a policy was insufficient to satisfy the requirement that officers certify they "received, read, and understand the policy."

  5. Sacks v. City of Oakland

    No. A126781 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2010)

    A126781 No. RG08-380286 A126817 12-10-2010 MARLEEN SACKS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant and Appellant. For Plaintiff and AppellaMarleen Sacks Donahue Gallagher WoodsDavid A. Stein, Esq. Marleen L. Sacks, Esq. For Defendant, Appellant and RespondentCity of Oakland John A. Russo, City AttorneyBarbara J. Parker, Assistant City AttorneyMark T. Morodomi, Deputy City AttorneyKevin D. Siegel, Deputy City Attorney Dondero, J. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION Pursuant to California

  6. Billester v. City of Corona

    26 Cal.App.4th 1107 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 12 times

    Docket No. E011320 July 13, 1994. Appeal from Superior Court of Riverside County, No. 214970, Ronald T. Deissler, Judge. COUNSEL Bauer, Harris McEvoy, Samuel M. Huestis, John Patrick McEvoy and Lauren John Udden for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Fields Creason, James A. Creason, Lauren L. McNerney and Maria K. Aarvig for Defendants and Respondents. Rutan Tucker, Hans Van Ligten and Mark A. Thompson as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. OPINION DABNEY, J. On June 1, 1991, Jason Billester

  7. Kishida v. State of California

    229 Cal.App.3d 329 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 15 times
    In Kishida v. State of California, supra, 229 Cal.App.3d 329, plaintiff conceded the pursuit policy satisfied the requirements of section 17004.7, subdivision (c).