§Why CasetextPricing

MORGAN HILL, CITY OF v. BUSHEY

Respondent, City of Morgan Hill, Supplemental Brief

4 Cited authorities

  1. Debottari v. City Council

    171 Cal.App.3d 1204 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 37 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that city council had mandatory duty to place referendum on ballot and citing other California cases holding that city registrar, county clerk, county board of supervisors, and the secretary of state similarly had mandatory duties

  2. Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette

    239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 222 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 1 times   2 Legal Analyses

    A154168 10-23-2018 SAVE LAFAYETTE TREES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, Defendant and Respondent; Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER, Stephan C. Volker, Alexis E. Krieg, Stephanie L. Clarke, Jamey M.B. Volker, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP, Malathy Subramanian, Sarah E. Owsowitz, for Defendant and Respondent. MILLER STARR REGALIA, George B. Speir, Arthur F. Coon, for Real Party

  3. City of Morgan Hill v. Bushey

    12 Cal.App.5th 34 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 2 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In Bushey, the city amended its general plan to change the land use designation for a parcel of property owned by River Park from industrial to commercial.

  4. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or