17 Cited authorities

  1. Coleman v. Department of Personnel Admininistration

    52 Cal.3d 1102 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 122 times
    Explaining that there must be "some meaningful mechanism of procedural protections before the state, as an employer, may treat a permanent or tenured employee's unauthorized absence as a resignation under the AWOL statute"
  2. O'Connell v. City of Stockton

    41 Cal.4th 1061 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 70 times
    Concluding a statute could not "be characterized as special legislation. (See Cal. Const., art. IV, § 16 [authorizing the enactment of statutes applicable to particular cities or counties]; White v. State of California (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 298, 305, 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 714 [Legislature must have rational basis for singling out a city or county to be ‘ "affected by [a special] statute" ’]; Baldwin [v. County of Tehama (1994) 31 Cal.App.4th 166, 166], 177, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 886 [uncodified enactments granting limited powers over groundwaters to ‘specifically identified special districts’ described as ‘ "special acts" ’])"
  3. In re Jenkins

    50 Cal.4th 1167 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 53 times
    Recognizing Legislature's delegation of authority to CDCR in Penal Code section 5068 to make rules and regulations governing prisoner classification and discipline
  4. Fuentes v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

    16 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 149 times
    In Fuentes v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1976) 16 Cal.3d 1 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 673, 547 P.2d 449] (Fuentes), the court had previously held that "formula A" was the correct method for calculating an award when permanent disability could be partially attributed to nonindustrial causes.
  5. American Coatings Association, Inc. v. South Coast Air Quality District

    54 Cal.4th 446 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 44 times
    Contrasting standard applied in ordinary mandamus proceedings under Code Civ. Proc., § 1085, and observing that traditional substantial evidence standard applies to judicial review of agency findings in an administrative mandamus proceeding under Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5
  6. Rossi v. Brown

    9 Cal.4th 688 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that initiative provisions do not except measures imposing a tax from the initiative power
  7. Webster v. Superior Court

    46 Cal.3d 338 (Cal. 1988)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that claimant injured in shooting rampage in offices of insolvent insurer should have been permitted to pursue personal injury claim outside of liquidation process where insurer had liability insurance that would cover any claim plus the expenses of defending it and where claimants stipulated that they would not seek any recovery from the insolvent insurer's assets
  8. McMackin v. Ehrheart

    194 Cal.App.4th 128 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 26 times
    Applying section 366.3 to a lawsuit premised on a decedent's promise to leave a life estate in a shared home to a cohabitant
  9. City and County of San Francisco v. Cooper

    13 Cal.3d 898 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 86 times
    Noting that a "legislative body retains a considerable degree of discretion in establishing compensation pursuant to . . . a 'prevailing wage' mandate"
  10. Board of Supervisors v. McMahon

    219 Cal.App.3d 286 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 47 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In McMahon, Butte County challenged on various grounds the application of a state statute requiring counties to contribute to the funding of a welfare program.