41 Cal.4th 1061 (Cal. 2007) Cited 70 times
Concluding a statute could not "be characterized as special legislation. (See Cal. Const., art. IV, § 16 [authorizing the enactment of statutes applicable to particular cities or counties]; White v. State of California (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 298, 305, 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 714 [Legislature must have rational basis for singling out a city or county to be ‘ "affected by [a special] statute" ’]; Baldwin [v. County of Tehama (1994) 31 Cal.App.4th 166, 166], 177, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 886 [uncodified enactments granting limited powers over groundwaters to ‘specifically identified special districts’ described as ‘ "special acts" ’])"