§Why CasetextPricing

GOONEWARDENE v. ADP

Amicus Curiae Brief of PAY-NET; PAYROLL WORLD, INC.; ERIE CUSTOM COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, INC.; TASK HR-VA LLC; HCM CENTRIC LLC; ADMINASOURCE, INC.; QTS PAYROLL SERVICES, INC.; PROMERIO, INC.; and PAYALITY, INC.;

4 Cited authorities

  1. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.

    3 Cal.4th 370 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 544 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an accountant is liable for negligent misrepresentation to a third party only if he knowingly supplies the information for the benefit of the third party, and the information is relied on by the third party in a transaction previously identified to the accountant, or a substantially similar transaction

  2. Section 226 - Itemized statement of wages

    Cal. Lab. Code § 226   Cited 2,235 times   117 Legal Analyses
    Providing only statutory penalties

  3. Section 1559 - Enforcement of contract made for benefit of third party

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1559   Cited 597 times
    Allowing enforcement a contract “made expressly for the benefit of a third person”

  4. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,152 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or