§Why CasetextPricing

LOPEZ v. SONY ELECTRONICS

Appellant’s Reply Brief on the Merits

39 Cited authorities

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 4,849 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”

  2. People v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty. (Zamudio)

    23 Cal.4th 183 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 521 times
    Recognizing a new theory may be presented for the first time on appeal if "it raised only a question of law and can be decided based on undisputed facts"

  3. Adoption of Kelsey S

    1 Cal.4th 816 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 612 times
    Holding unconstitutional statutory scheme whereby unwed biological mother could prevent unwed biological father from attaining status of presumed father, whose consent is required for adoption of nonmarital child

  4. People v. Farell

    28 Cal.4th 381 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 432 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "theft of an amount exceeding fifty thousand dollars" covers the theft of trade secrets worth over $50,000

  5. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

    32 Cal.4th 350 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 396 times
    Holding that civilians who provide information leading to an arrest cannot be held liable for false arrest

  6. In re Greg F.

    55 Cal.4th 393 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 300 times
    Finding court was within discretion to dismiss later 602 petition, after admissions entered, in order to permit more serious commitment based on later filed probation violation alleging same acts

  7. In re Steele

    32 Cal.4th 682 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 341 times
    Holding that motions for post-conviction discovery should generally be brought in the trial court that rendered the judgment

  8. People v. Blackburn

    61 Cal.4th 1113 (Cal. 2015)   Cited 220 times
    In Blackburn, this court classified as reversible per se a failure to obtain any personal jury waiver at all from a defendant in a civil commitment proceeding.

  9. California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of Rialto Unified School Dist.

    14 Cal.4th 627 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 344 times
    Describing the judicial role of construing statutes consistent with their plain meaning and other indicia of legislative intent

  10. Delaney v. Superior Court

    50 Cal.3d 785 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 384 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the use of "all" in a constitutional provision precluded any exceptions

  11. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or