§Why CasetextPricing

KIRCHNER (KRISTOPHER) ON H.C.

Petitioner’s Request for Judicial Notice

7 Cited authorities

  1. Miller v. Alabama

    567 U.S. 460 (2012)   Cited 6,830 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Holding mandatory life without parole sentences unconstitutional for all juvenile offenders

  2. Graham v. Florida

    560 U.S. 48 (2010)   Cited 4,406 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding life without parole sentences unconstitutional for non-homicide juvenile offenders

  3. Montgomery v. Louisiana

    577 U.S. 190 (2016)   Cited 3,087 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407, which held as unconstitutional mandatory life imprisonment without parole for juvenile offenders, announced a new substantive rule of constitutional law that must be given retroactive effect

  4. Roper v. Simmons

    543 U.S. 551 (2005)   Cited 3,496 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that the death penalty cannot be imposed upon juvenile offenders"

  5. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.

    133 Cal.App.4th 26 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 203 times
    Denying request for judicial notice for failure to show the "Fact Sheet" was communicated to the Legislature as a whole

  6. Rule 8.252 - Judicial notice; findings and evidence on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.252   Cited 593 times

    (a)Judicial notice (1) To obtain judicial notice by a reviewing court under Evidence Code section 459, a party must serve and file a separate motion with a proposed order. (2) The motion must state: (A) Why the matter to be noticed is relevant to the appeal; (B) Whether the matter to be noticed was presented to the trial court and, if so, whether judicial notice was taken by that court; (C) If judicial notice of the matter was not taken by the trial court, why the matter is subject to judicial notice

  7. Rule 8.71 - Electronic filing

    Cal. R. 8.71

    (a) Mandatory electronic filing Except as otherwise provided by these rules, the Supreme Court Rules Regarding Electronic Filing, or court order, all parties are required to file all documents electronically in the reviewing court. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2020.) (b)Self-represented parties (1) Self-represented parties are exempt from the requirement to file documents electronically. (2) A self-represented party may agree to file documents electronically. By electronically filing any