KIRCHNER (KRISTOPHER) ON H.C.Petitioner’s Opening Brief on the MeritsCal.June 20, 2016SUPREME COURT PELE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAN 9 0 2016 Frank A. McGuire Clerk Deputy No.: $233508 No.: D067920 A In re KRISTOPHER KIRCHNERon Habeas Corpus (Super. Ct. Nos. HC21804, CRN26291) PETITIONER’S OPENING BRIEF ON THE MERITS From the Court of Appeal, Fourth District Division One, Reversing the Trial Court’s Grantof Petitioner’s Habeas Corpus Petition --000QO0o00-- RANDYMIZE,Chief Deputy Office ofthe Primary Public Defender County of San Diego ABBEY J. NOEL State Bar #239258 Deputy Public Defenders 450 "B"Street, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 338-4623 Attorneys for Petitioner KRISTOPHER KIRCHNER i}SO RR BR BE TT F R E E T E E S R h e e TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.....ssssssssssssssssssssseessnsssssseecececeecsessssssseseeeessessesseseniesen iii PETITIONER’S OPENING BRIEF ON THE MERITS.....sssssssssssssseesssseesesssssssnes 2 ISSUES PRESENTED...sessssssssssssssssecseceesssssssescsanssceeeceeeceeceeeeeseceeseseessiiuesnnasnante 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTSQ.vssssssssecssessssssssscssssseseerssunnnssssssseeeee 3 ARGUMENT...sessseceesusansneceeesseneceeeneeeeesnnnnnisintnniinnnresnnnene 7 I. PENAL CODE SECTION1170, SUBDIVISION (d)(2) DOES NOT PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE REMEDY FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS OF MILLER/GUTIERREZ.....8 A. Gutierrez Correctly Held that Penal Code Section 1170, Subdivision (d)(2) Is Not a Constitutional Remedy for Juveniles Illegally Sentenced to LWOP............ccceeeeeeeeen eee essreees9 B. Unlike the Wyomingstatute and Penal Code 3051, Penal Code Section 1170, Subdivision (d)(2) Does Not Supply An Adequate REMEY.........cecece ecco renee ee eeeeeene nee e ences ence eeeeen eee ea eae eens aates 12 C. Penal Code Section 1170, Subdivision (d)(2) Places an Unconstitutional Burden on Offenders to Obtain Their Miller Rights, Violating Their Right to be Free from Cruel and Unusual Punishment Under the Eighth Amendmentofthe U.S. COMStitution.........ccccccceecscsceseesvvceceeeeceeepeececseeeessssaneseseenss 14 D. The Holding in In re Kirchner Violates Due Process and Equal Protection Under the Fourteenth Amendment.................eccseensees 16 II. IN RE KIRCHNER CREATESA SPLIT OF AUTHORITY IN THE LOWER COURTS AND WITHIN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL Wu. cceccceeceseeseeesessseseetesssasesseseee 18 Ill. IN RE KIRCHNER CONTRAVENES CALIFORNIA LAW THAT HAS TRADITIONALLY GRANTED HABEAS CORPUSRELIEF TO OFFENDERS SERVING AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE...21 IV. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY GRANTED MR. KIRCHNER’S HABEASPETITION UNDER MILLER/GUTIERREZ.........scee 22 A. Montgomery v. Louisiana Held the Decisions in Miller and Gutierrez Are Retroactive....... 0. cece sce ce eee eesseesen en eesseneeeetesDo CONCLUSION...ee ececeesecseeseeeseesceseatsscssessessnsessesssesseesesesenasseseeassesseeeseeseateass 25 CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT PROOF OF SERVICE APPENDIX “A” ooo ceeceeesseeeseees Juvenile Offenders serving LWOPsentencesas of October 2015 . il TABLE OFAUTHORITIES PAGE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Eighth Amendment ........csscessssssecesssssessessscesssscesscsssnsesesseeesessesssssesssesessseesseassereneees passim Fourteenth Amendment...cccssscseecessesessssssssssscessevessassesssnnsscesscassesseserensesnseseees passim FEDERAL CASES Graham v. Florida (2010) S60 U.S. 48...esesesctsecsesseseeseacseesensaseaseecensasseseseseeecaseseaseassessseenes 10, 11, 23 Miller v. Alabama (2012) 132 S.Ct. 2455 uo escccscscscesseseeerssessssesssssesesseseeescosssseessnssssorsesesenseersreerees passim Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016) 136 S.Ct. 718.ccsscseesescssesseeessesssnssssvesesecsessrsossevsssossesessssssessvesesseseases passim Roper v. Simmons (2004) 543 U.S. SSL issssssssssssscsesessceesensecssetssesssessensstsesescsereneseseseaeeessesssneescersososssans 7, 23 Schriro v. Summerlin (2004) 542 U.S. 348...eccsssecsssescsecseeseceseecssesseserseesssecsessoeseeessesosossecnestetseesesenseeenes 6, 24 Teague v. Lane (1989) 489 U.S. 288... cesessessccesscessesessessesssecssensscessssseeeseesesenessersusssasssassceteasanseses 6, 24 STATE CASES In re Berg (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 418veecscsssssssssessssssserssessersrssessessnsesssssssesesssseenseees passim In re Gandolfo (1984) 36 Cal.3d 889 uu... eccscscssssssscssesecessssssssessssesssessesssesssssesssssssnsnsesneseareneseecensesees 22 In re Jackson (1964) 61 Cal.2d 500 oo.eeecesseceseseneesesssssssssssssssssronsseeecsreestsessssseesseessseceseenereenens 21 In re Johnson (1970) 3 Cal.3d 404 uo.eecessscssesssecesscsscsessssssscsssstsssssssssessssersesesssssssscssseseseaseeseasenees 21 In re Kirchner (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 1398 wo... cesessessesesssessensesssreesseneeseeesseeeceseeseessseteaseasees passim People v. Belmontes (1983) 34 Cal.3d 335 w.ccesessssssecscsssscecesssesssssesssssssssvsssssscessessssessssssssvsssssceseteeseneentasess 21 People v. Canty (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1266oeccssescesscceessesssssserssesscssssssseeseeeessesseserscsseasesassesesaeseees 14 People v. Chavez (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 18 ooo. eesseseesessssesssssseecsscessssssesseassesssssessssesscesreresseseatensees 16 People v. Franklin (May 26, 2016, No. S217699) 2016 LEXIS 3592 oo... eesesseseseseessesessssssesseaseessesnenes 12 ili People v. Gutierrez (2014) 58 Cal4th 354oeeescctccsstesenceessessscssesessesseeesseessussecseceesevsseseeensenesenes passim People v. Guinn (1994) 28 CalApp.4th 1130veeeecececeessessessecssescesssessseesssersrsssseenessessnssnseeeaeens 24, 25 People v. Hannon (1971) 5 Cal.3d 330eeesssccsseseescssensecssesssessesssscsecssssssesssessesssseesecsssssesenssereesenteasens 21 People v. Lozano (2016) 243 CalApp.4th 1126 0...csescscssssessssesssvecsnssscseseessveessesosesssseseesesenessereens passim People v. Navarro (1972) 7 Cal.3d 248 uu... ecsessessescersesseecsensssesrceseessessccssssessssssssessseceesssessenssacensenssaesesees 21 People v. Superior Court (Romero) ; (1996) 13 Cal4th 497 ooeesecsssssscsssssssscsnesssesssscssesssssssrasassesssseveserseseeseeeserseseeseenes 21 People v. Tenorio (1970) 3 Cal.3d 89 oueeccesccsccesstesersesssessssssersssseseassssesoasenssnesesseseeseseeeseseensaeenssenses 21 PENAL CODE Section 187, Subd. (8)......cccccssccsssccsssccscneesensecesesecessedenssecesssesseseesasessesseesseesnesesstessessearers 3,4 Section 190.2, subd. (a)(17).......ccsccssscsscsesersesecesessessesesseesessesnecsneceesceseeesecsseesacesssessesesserens 4 Section 190.5 ......c.cccccssssessseessececesseeesesessoeseeseesonsesesseecesesensesessesaseeseeeesessesssesssseneseesasernseerss 24 Section 190.5, SUb.(b) oo... ee eesesssesenesscesscsseeseevsessecesesesecesevenesonssescsseeaessesasenssenseratesasens 9 Section 21 1... .escccssssssecsssscssscssssscccseseseesssssescsscsesnesesassseessesessessassessssssseresesssensssseseserens 4,5 Section 245, Subd. (€)(2)........essssscccssscsescessesecsssssceosesessesesssssesessnrsssessevsessssensersecesenssenetensees 4 Section 459.......csssscscsccsecssesceseserserecsonsessracesessuscssenssenseseneseneeessssecseeseseeaetseressrgensessecseasens 4,5 Section 654.......ccscccsccssessssesessecsctssseesecessesseseoonssssssvesseusscosseessscnsevsensseseesessssneseasensenseseeseneees 5 Section 1170, Subd. (A)(2)...essssseccoeesssessssessssscssssssssscessseessssecsssuessssesssseessessssscsssevecnnere passim Section 3051... ccessssssssscssssscsscssessescssccesseesesssescessensserssesssesenssssceesssevsressesssenserevesessneses 12, 13 Section 12022, Subd. (b)..........cccsscccssrssonsnecssesseeresaceesesseesessesseuevcnsesseesseressesnestesesetesensses 4,5 Section 12022.5.......cssssssssssssccesescssesscescencesceessssseavesseeseassessssesseseesssseesssasesersessstecseseeasenssneees 4 Section 12022.7..........cccsesccessesccssescescesseececenscesssessssseesssssaecesssesvesssssonsscssseasecseesssesseonsnees 4,5 WELFARE & INSTITUTIONS CODE Section 707 ......cscscssssscsccssersersscesecsssesessceessauesesesessscesessaesessececesenssesesssersesseneseasecssessnesseneessessee 3 Section 707.2...ccccccesscsssscssssessscsscessceessesseecnscesnsessseseescenesssaeesseosseseessassseeeessesaecrssatesseessenseeses 5 OTHER AUTHORITIES Wyo. Stat. Amn. § 6-10-301(C).....ccssccseseesserssessesessssssssscssssesssssssssssesssenscnssrcnessonsseseseess 12 OTHER STATE CASES State v. Mares 2014 WY 126 .ooiccccccccccccccscesssssssceccessscssssecececensessesssusseneeeceecesescecssusesesessesssscesensessnsceeees 12 iv IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA No.: $233508 Ct. App. No.: D067920 In re KRISTOPHER KIRCHNERon . Habeas Corpus (Super. Ct. Nos. HC21804, CRN26291) PETITIONER’S OPENING BRIEF ON THE MERITS Ne we ee ! Se em s” “ o e ” “ e e e ” S o n e ” “ o m e “ e e e ” “ e e e ” “ n e e S e e ” ISSUES PRESENTED Is California Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) an adequate remedy at law for a juvenile sentence oflife without parole which has been found to be unconstitutional and illegal by the holding in Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. __ [132 S.Ct. 2455] (Miller)? Does the holdingin Jn re Kirchner (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 1398fail to follow this Court’s holding in People v. Gutierrez (2014) 58 Cal.4th 354 (Gutierrez) and result in continued violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments for juvenile offenders illegally sentencedto life without parole? Doesthe holding in In re Kirchner, supra, which representsa split of authority within the Fourth District Court ofAppeal sincetheir holding in Jn re Berg (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 418’, also create a split of authority in light of People v. Lozano (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1126? STATEMENTOF THE CASEAND FACTS On April 28, 1993, Mr. Kirchner, age 16, and Mr. Damien Miller, age 15, robbed a gun store in Vista, owned by Ross Elvey. Onceinside the store, Mr. Kirchnerhit 59-year-old Mr. Elvey with a metal pipe causing severe traumathat ultimately resulted in Mr. Elvey’s death 40 dayslater. (Clerk’s Transcript (C.T.) pp. 90-94.) Mr. Kirchner wasinitially charged in juvenile court. (C.T. pp. 85-87.) At a hearing under Welfare andInstitutions Code section 707, Mr. Kirchner presented evidence he had noprior criminal record, grew up in an abusive household and in a neighborhoodriddled with gang violence. Additionally, Mr. Kirchner suffered several head injuries as a child and wasthe victim of several violent attacks in his gang-ridden neighborhood. Further, Mr. Kirchner suffered from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and depression. His depression was severe and led him to attemptsuicide at age 14 and again at age 16. (C.T. pp. 89-110.) The juvenile court, however, found Mr. Kirchner unfit to be prosecuted as a juvenile and he was charged as an adult. (C.T. p. 112.) On October 26, 1993, an Information wasfiled in Superior Court alleging murderin the first degree, California Penal Code section 187, subd. (a)” with allegations he personally used a deadly weapon(Pen. Code § ' The split of authority is a fairly included issue since it occured after the petition for review was submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court 8.520.) * All references are to the California Penal Code unless otherwisestated. 12022, subd. (b)), and committed murder during the commission of a burglary and robbery (Pen. Code §190.2, subd. (a)(17)). He was also charged with robbery, (Pen. Code § 211), with allegations of personaluse of a deadly weapon (Pen.Code § 12022, subd. (b)) and personalinfliction of great bodily injury (Pen. Code § 12022.7). A third count alleged he committed burglary (Pen. Code § 459), with allegations of personal use of a deadly weapon (Pen. Code § 12022, subd. (b)) and personalinfliction of great bodily injury (Pen. _ Code § 12022.7). Lastly, the Information alleged Mr. Kirchner commited assault with a firearm (Pen. Code § 245, subd. (a)(2)) with an allegation of personal use of a handgun (Pen. Code § 12022.5). (C.T. pp. 114-116.) During a benchtrial, Mr. Kirchner movedto strike the special circumstanceallegation that he committed the murder while engaged in the commission of a robbery and burglary (Pen. Code § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)). Mr. Kirchner argued the imposition of the sentence oflife without the possibility of parole that he faced under Penal Code section 190.5 would constitute a violation of the United States Constitution’s Eighth Amendment. The court denied this motion, agreeing with the prosecution that since death sentences were constitutionally permissible for 16- and 17-year-olds, a juvenile life without parole sentence is also permissible. On March 10, 1994, Mr. Kirchner was found guilty of one count of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) and the special circumstance allegation that he committed the murder while engaged in the commission of a robbery and burglary (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A), (G)), and that he personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon during the commission of the murder (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)). Mr. Kirchner was also convicted of one count of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) and one count of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), with allegations as to each offense that he personally inflicted great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 12022.7) and personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)). (C.T. pp. 237-239.) Thetrial court remanded Mr. Kirchnerto the California Youth Authority (CYA) pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 707.2 in order to determine his amenability to the training and treatment offered by that agency. While there, he was evaluated by membersofthe interdisciplinary team, including a psychologist. Their reports described Mr. Kirchner as unsophisticated, vulnerable to peer influences, andlikely to have his criminal behavior exacerbated if he were sentencedto adult prison. The CYAconcluded there was a reasonable probability that Mr. Kirchner's likelihood to commit further crimes could be reduced or eliminated within the available confinementtime if sentenced as a juvenile. (C.T. pp. 243-259.) Citing the nature of the offense,the trial court declined to follow the recommendation of the CYA and, on September 15, 1994, sentenced Mr. Kirchnerto life without parole for the murder conviction, plus a consecutive year for the weapon enhancement. The court stayed sentencing on the remaining counts and attendant allegations pursuant to Penal Code section 654. (C.T. pp. 66-67.) Mr. Kirchnerfiled a notice of appeal, but his appeal was dismissed after an opening brief wasnotfiled on his behalf. (C.T.p. 261-262.) In 2013, after the Supreme Court decided Miller, Mr. Kirchnerfiled a writ of habeas corpus that was denied. The denial preceded this Court’s decision in Gutierrez. Mr.Kirchnerfiled a second writ of habeas corpus in October 2014 contendinghis sentence violated the Eighth Amendmentas defined by Miller and Gutierrez. On March 27, 2015, the superior court granted Mr. Kirchner’s petition andthe district attorney appealed. On June 29, 2015, the district attorney filed their opening brief and reiterated that the holdings in Miller/Gutierrez did not apply retroactively to a collateral attack on the sentence imposed.On July 28, 2015, Mr. Kirchner filed a response, arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court and California Supreme Court’s rulings in Miller/Gutierrez dictated a substantive rule that should be applied on collateral review. On October 29, 2015, the court of appeal requested additional briefing regarding whether California courts have traditionally used the rules laid out by Teague v. Lane (1989) 489 U.S. 288 and Schriro v. Summerlin (2004) 542 U.S. 348 to determine whetherto grant collateral review. Both parties answered this question in the affirmative. Atoral argument on December 16, 2015, the court of appeal asked whether Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) presented an adequate remedy at law. They pondered whether requiring juveniles to seekrelief via Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) would ensure the re-sentencing court considered the defendant’s post-sentence conductin prison. On January 25, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016)U.S.__ [136 S.Ct. 718] (Montgomery), holding that their decision in Miller applies retroactively. On January 26, 2016, the court of appeal requestedletter briefing regarding the effect ofMontgomery on the issues in the case. The court specifically asked the parties to address Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) and the language from Montgomery M R M . A M N S T R E R E P 2 S A N N A referencing the Wyomingstatute that converts juvenile life without parole sentencesto life with parole at 25 years without a re-sentencing hearing. Mr. Kirchner submitted a letter brief on February 1, 2016, arguing Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) did not present an adequate remedyat law. On February 23, 2016, the court of appeal issued a published decision, reversing the grant of Mr. Kirchner’s habeaspetition with directions that Mr. Kirchner, and any otherjuvenile illegally sentenced to life without parole whohasserved 15 years of his sentence, must seek relief via Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). On April 4, 2016, Mr. Kirchnerpetitioned this Court for review. Review was granted on May18, 2016. ARGUMENT California has approximately 300 juvenile offenders serving an illegal sentenceoflife without parole.* These juveniles were sentenced under a presumption oflife without parole and without consideration of the Miller factors. The U.S. Supreme Court has declared these illegally sentenced juveniles are entitled to collateral review. (Montgomery v. Louisiana, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 735.) “...[W]hen a new substantive rule of constitutional law controls the outcome ofa case, the Constitution requires state collateral review courts to give retroactive effect to that rule.” Ud. at p. 729.) Because the holdings in Miller and Roperreaffirm that sentencing a childtolife without parole is excessive and unconstitutional for all but the rare juvenile offender, Miller announced a new substantiverule. (/d. at pp. 733-734.) The 3 See Appendix A where approximately six offenders out of 289 provided by CDCRreceived an LWOPsentenceafter this court decided Gutierrez. superior court correctly determined Mr. Kirchneris serving an illegal sentence and granted habeasrelief. As this Court held, Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2)is not an adequate remedyfor juvenile offendersillegally sentenced to life without parole andit should not be their only meansof seeking a legal sentence. (People v. Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at 1387, People v. Lozano, supra, 243 Cal.App.4th at 1138, In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at 436.) Requiring a select group of offenders to seek relief via Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) violates their constitutional rights to be free from cruel and unusual! punishment under the Eighth Amendment andtheir rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. I. PENAL CODE SECTION1170, SUBDIVISION (d)(2) DOES NOT PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE REMEDYFOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS OF MILLER/GUTIERREZ In Montgomery, the U.S. Supreme Court heldthe ruling in Miller applies retroactively. (Montgomery, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 736.) “Miller’s conclusion that the sentenceoflife without parole is disproportionate for the vast majority ofjuvenile offenders raises a grave risk that manyare being held in violation of the Constitution.” (Ibid.) In re Kirchner distorted the holding ofMontgomery whenit stated a “‘...process by which the defendant is given a fair opportunity to be considered for parole,” would satisfy Miller. (in re Kirchner, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1413-1414.) Ina recentsplit of authority, the Berg court observed “...section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) affords many defendants sentenced to LWOPin violation of Miller none of the rights set forth in Miller and Montgomery...” Un re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at p. 439.) Because Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) doesnotsatisfy the constitutional requirements set out in Miller/Gutierrez/Montgomery, the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s ruling fails to correct Mr. Kirchner’s illegal sentence. A. Gutierrez Correctly Held that Penal Code Section 1170, Subdivision (d)(2) Is Not a Constitutional Remedy for Juveniles Illegally Sentenced to LWOP. This Court expressly rejected Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) as aconstitutional remedy. (Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at p. 1387.) Gutierrez properly examined Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) and foundit did not satisfy Miller. Ibid.) Although Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) provides a potential mechanism for re-sentencing after serving 15 to 24 years, the convictedstill has an effective sentence oflife without the possibility of parole. (/d. at p. 1386.)* Ultimately Gutierrez held: In sum, construing section 190.5(b)to establish a presumption in favoroflife without parole raises serious constitutional concerns under the reasoning of Miller and the body of precedent on which Miller relied. The recent enactmentof section Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) does not eliminate those concerns. (Id. at p. 1387, emphasis added.) The Kirchner court defied this Court’s invalidation of Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2), opining the Gutierrez court was only * Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2), presents an option to a select group of legally sentenced juveniles who are determined to be “incorrigible” after a proper Miller/Gutierrez sentencing hearing. (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at 442.) concermedwith the, “‘...strictly prospective focus of the courts in Gutierrez and Graham....” (In re Kirchner, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at p. 1419.) But, the holding in Gutierrez does not draw a distinction between direct appeal and collateral review cases. Instead, Gutierrez details why Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) fails to address the juveniles’ unconstitutional sentences. (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4that p. 442.) “Thus, the Kirchner court's conclusion that section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) does provide an adequate remedy for a Miller violation conflicts with Gutierrez.” (Ibid.) The Kirchner court’s focus on the admissibility of post-conviction conduct at a Miller resentencing hearing was unneccesary. Addressing Montgomery’sdissent (specifically the potential difficulty of conducting sentencing hearings after decades have passed), the court opined, “Arguably, in the absence of mandatory resort to section 1170, subdivision (d)(2), a defendant whose post-conviction conduct would not warrant an opportunity for parole would nonetheless be entitled to a new sentence upon a showing that at the timeofhis or her original sentencing there had been no proof of his or her incorrigibility.” (Jn re Kirchner, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th atp. 1417.) The Kirchner court’s desire to permit post-conviction conduct during re-sentencing causedit to ignore controlling case law. (Jd. at p. 1417.) However, the Kirchner court’s concerns are unfounded because controlling case law already permits the admissibility of post-sentence behavior at Miller re-sentencing hearings. “... [T]here is nothing in Miller, Gutierrez, or Montgomery that suggests, muchless states, that a trial court is precluded from considering evidence of a defendant's postconviction conduct 10 in conducting a resentencing as a remedyfor Miller error.” (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at p. 440.) “Gutierrez effectively disposesofthis contention in its recognition that amenability to rehabilitation must be ~ considered at sentencing before imposition of an LWOPsentence.” (/d.at p. 441, citing Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at pp. 1386-1387 and Peoplev. Lozano, supra, 243 Cal.App.4th at p. 1138, emphasis added.) Montgomery reiterated this position by considering the petitioner’s evolution from a troubled, misguided youth to a model memberofthe prison community— the petitioner’s submissions demonstrated rehabilitation. (Montgomery, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 736.) At a Miller resentencing hearing, unlike a Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) petition, rehabilitation evidence is not the overriding factor in determining whether an offender shouldbe resentencedtolife with parole, but it can still be considered by thetrial court. (Miller, supra, 132 8.Ct. 2455 (slip.op., at p. 10), quoting Graham, supra,atp. 74; Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at pp. 1388-1389.) However,a juvenile offender’s failure to rehabilitate while serving a sentence with no hope of release cannot retroactively justify imposititon of the sentence, because the sentence was still disproportionateat the outset. (People v. Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at p. 1386, citing Graham, supra, 560 U.S.at p. 73.) Thus, the Kirchner court’s concern that Mr. Kirchner’s subsequent conduct in prison would not be considered by the courts at a re-sentencing hearing is misguided andviolates the spirit of Miller becauseit places too much emphasison post-conviction conduct. 11 B. Unlike the Wyomingstatute and Penal Code 3051, Penal Code Section 1170, Subdivision (d)(2) Does Not Supply An Adequate Remedy. The Fourth District Court of Appealrelied upon dicta from the Montgomery Court that referenced a Wyomingstatute that legally changes a juvenile’s sentence from life without parole to life with parole at 25 years. (Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-10-301(c).). The Wyoming Supreme Court held in State v. Mares 2014 WY 126 that defendant’s life without parole sentence was, as a matter of law, converted to life with the possibility of parole in 25 years. All juveniles servinglife without parole in Wyoming were noweligible for parole at 25 years. In contrast, the potential relief provided by Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) is not automatic and thus (unlike the Wyomingstatute) does not cure the constitutional infirmity forall offenders servingillegal life without parole sentences. This Court recently held Penal Codesection 3051, like Wyoming’s statute, had a similar effect on a juvenile sentenced to 50 to life. In People v. Franklin (May 26, 2016, No. S217699) 2016 LEXIS 3592, this Court held “the Legislature has effected this change by operation of law, with no additional resentencing procedure required.” (Jd. at p.*25.) When Franklin relied on Gutierrez’s rejection of Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) as an argumentfor why Penal Code section 3051 did notsatisfy the constitutional requirements of Miller and Caballero, this Court pointed out the crucial differences in the statutes and the many hurdles that a juvenile offender faces when seeking resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). (/d. at p.*30.) Gutierrez was sentenced under a schemethat presumedhis incorrigibility “‘at the outset,” and the resulting sentence 12 would remainin effect unless and until he filed a successful petition for recall. (Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at p. 1386— 1387; see id. at p. 1386 [A sentenceof life without parole under section 190.5(b) remainsfully effective after the enactmentof section 1170(d)(2).”].) Franklin is not subject to a sentence that presumeshis incorrigibility; by operation of law, he is entitled to a parole hearing and possible release after 25 years ofincarceration. (Cd. at pp.*31-32.) Further, the Wyoming statute and Penal Code section 3051 were passed in response to Miller and other relevant juvenile caselaw in an attempt to correct illegal sentences ofjuveniles.” The same cannotbe said for Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) was proposedtothe legislature in December of 2010. A review ofthe legislative history demonstrates that it was not, nor could it possibly have been, submitted as a remedy to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller or Montgomery.° ‘Asthe court in Berg correctly pointed out, there is nothing in the text of Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) referencing the Legislature’s intent to remedy Miller error. (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at p. 441.) Montgomery makes clear that petitioners like Mr. Kirchner are entitled to habeas corpusrelief. Anything short of converting Mr. Kirchner’sillegal > (See 2013 Wy. HB 23, and [as of June 15, 2016] .) ° (See [as of June 15, 2016] .) 13 life without parole sentence to life with parole at 25 years cannot stand as a constitutionally sound substitute. C. Penal CodeSection 1170, Subdivision (d)(2) Places an Unconstitutional Burden on Offenders to Obtain Their Miller Rights, Violating Their Right to be Free from Cruel and Unusual Punishment Underthe Eighth Amendmentof the U.S. Constitution. A thorough analysis of Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) showsthatit cannot satisfy the Eighth Amendmentconstitutional requirements of Miller/Montgomery/Gutierrez. The Kirchner court’s assertion that “the People bear the burden”at any hearing is contrary to the plain languageofthe statute; and the court’s analysis violated the rules of statutory construction. (In re Kirchner, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at p. 1418; People v. Canty (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1266, Jn re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4" at p. 442.) Thestatute specifically places burdens on the petitioner: Under subparagraph (A)(i),“...the defendant may submit to the sentencing court a - petition for recall and resentencing. ” Under subparagraph (B), “The defendantshall file the original petition with the sentencing court” and “the defendant's statement describing his or her remorse and work towards rehabilitation, and the defendant's statement that one of the followingis true.” Under(E), “If the court finds by a preponderanceof the evidencethat the statements in the petition are true, the court shall hold a hearing to consider whetherto recall the sentence and commitment...” Section (F) of the statute places the burden on defendantto provea litany of post-conviction factors such as seeking rehabilitation, maintaining family ties and a lack of 14 disciplinary actions for violence in the past five years. (See Pen. Code § 1170, subdivision (d)(2).) Whenapplying for a sentencing hearing under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2), the defendant must demonstrate rehabilitation and remorse along with manyotherrestrictive criteria. The court is instructed to exercise its discretion with those limiting criteria in mind. (Pen. Code § 1170, subd. (d)(2)(G).) These limitations makeit “...all but certain that many defendants would be required to continue to serve LWOPsentences without any sentencing court ever having considered whether such defendants were the ‘rare juvenile offender[s] whose crimereflects irreparable corruption,’ as is required.” (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at p. 437, citing Montgomery, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 724.) The limitations placed on the court by an Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) petition renders it an inadequate remedyat law. In contrast, the sole question in granting a habeaspetition under Miller/Montgomery/Gutierrez, is whether the defendant was sentenced under an unlawful presumptionoflife without parole and/or whether the Miller factors were not properly considered. If that question is answered in the affirmative, the court must recall the illegal sentence and conduct a new sentencing hearing. At the re-sentencinghearing,the court shall consider five factors as dictated by Miller/Gutierrez: “(1) the inherent impact of the juvenile's age on his culpability; (2) the juvenile's home and family environment; (3) the circumstances of the homicide offense; (4) the juvenile's ability to deal with law enforcement officers and prosecutors as well as effectively assist in his own defense; and (5) the possibility of 15 rehabilitation.” (People v. Chavez (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 18, 32; citing Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at pp. 1389-1390, emphasis added.) Thesefive factors are markedly different from the various criteria an offender must meet to earn a re-sentencing hearing under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). The extensive list of required elements in Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) is among the many reasons Jn re Kirchner erroneously determinedthatthis statute satisfies the Eighth Amendmentas defined by Miller/Montgomery/Gutierrez. Specifically, neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor the California Supreme Court requires a showing of remorse, rehabilitation, or confinementfor at least 15 years to demonstrate that a life without parole sentenceis illegal. Rather, the focus is on the “potential for rehabilitation.” (Miller v. Alabama, supra, 132 S.Ct. at p. 2468, emphasis added.) “Further, section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) requires all prisoners seeking to obtain resentencing for Miller error under the statute to prevail in a separate collateral proceeding before obtaining any of the rights guaranteed by Miller and Montgomery.” (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at pp.439- 440.) Merely affording a particular class of offenders a “chance at a chance” at parole is not sufficient to address juveniles serving an illegal sentence of life without parole. (Montgomery v. Louisiana, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 736.) D. The Holdingin Jn re Kirchner Violates Due Process and Equal Protection Under the Fourteenth Amendment. Every juvenile in the State of California sentenced prior to Miller and Gutierrez is potentially serving an illegal sentence. (Montgomery v. 16 Louisiana, supra, 136 S.Ct. at pp. 733-734, See Appendix A.) Adopting Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) as their sole remedy abrogates their ability to seek relief for their illegal sentence. The effect of In re Kirchneris an outright bar for those who murdered a peaceofficer, a public official, a firefighter, committed torture, and/or cannot show remorse or rehabilitation(i.e., those claiming their innocence). (Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (d)(2)(ii) and (B).) Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) would bar Mr. Montgomery himself, who shot and killed a deputy sheriff at age 17, from re-sentencing in California. (Montgomery, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 725.) Requiring other offenders who have served 15 or more yearsoftheir illegal life without parole sentence to seek relief under Penal Code section1170, subdivision (d)(2) violates due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. To concludethat a statutory procedure for which the defendantis expressly disqualified affords an adequate remedy for an Eighth Amendmentviolation would violate basic principles of due process. On the other hand, if Kirchner is intended to limit the habeas corpus remedies only for those defendants whoare not disqualified from filing a section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) petition, this would raise equal protection concerns. (Un re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at pp. 438-439.) The Kirchner court does not address why someoffenders should be afforded a Miller hearing and those who haveserved at least 15 years in custody should be required to petition the court under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). In fact, its holding creates more questions than answers: What of those offenders who have served over 24 years of their 17 sentence? Whatofthose offenders who have missedtheir first two chancesat petitioning the court under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2)? What of those offenders who havepetitioned under Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) and were not afforded release? Must they wait until their next available petitioning date, if there is one left? What of those who are statutorily banned from seeking relief under Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2)? What of those offenders who have served 14 years of their illegal sentence,is their post-conviction behavior excluded at a Miller re-sentencing? (Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (d)(2)(A)(ii) and (B).) How is a court to determine whether a defendant has shown remorse (especially if an offenderstill claims his innocence)? Howis a court to determine whether a defendant has shown efforts at rehabilitation? If a defendant cannot show either of these things, his petition will fail from the outset and he will not be awarded a re-sentencing hearing. (Pen. Code § 1170, subd. (d)(2)(B) and (G).) The court in Jn re Kirchner announced rule that violates the due process and equalprotection clause of the U.S. Constitution. (Jn re Berg, supra, 246 Cal.App.4th at pp. 438-439.) Il. INRE KIRCHNER CREATESA SPLIT OF AUTHORITYIN THE LOWER COURTSAND WITHIN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL There is split of authority between different appellate divisions, but more importantly there is also a split within the same appellate division, since one justice has reversedhis prior concurrence with Jn re Kirchner. (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at p. 442, Justice McDonald concurring 18 opinion.) In his concurring opinion, Justice McDonald wrote:“I concur in the opinion and write separately to acknowledgethat after considerable reflection, although I signed the opinion in In re Kirchner (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 1398, I agree with the opinionin this case includingits provisions that are inconsistent with Jn re Kirchner.” Ibid.) The court in Berg acknowledgedtherarity of disagreeing with their colleagues; however, stated that there were good reasonsfor disagreeing with them,as is most cleary seen in Justice McDonald’s change of opinion. (Jd. at p. 442, footnote 12.) In re Berg rejected every contention proposed bythe court in Kirchner. The Berg court opined that the ruling in Kirchner would result in continued violations of Miller, Gutierrez, and Montgomery. The actual remedy authorized in Montgomery, extending paroleeligibility, provides an adequate remedy for Miller error becauseit is the defendant's ineligibility for parole that is the harm suffered by juvenile defendants sentenced to LWOP.In contrast, providinga defendantwith the opportunity to file a petition under section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) that may or may notlead to the imposition of a new sentence containing a period of parole clearly does not guarantee suchrelief. (In re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at pp. 436-437.) The Berg court strongly criticized the Kirchner opinion. The court cited several reasonsfor rejecting Kirchner: this Court had already rejected Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) in Gutierrez, the Lozano court had done the same and wasnotcited in Kirchner, and the plain language of Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) cannot be rewritten to place the 19 burden on the prosecution. (/n re Berg, supra, 247 Cal.App.4th at pp. 437- 439.) The Berg court acknowledgedthat on all constitutional levels Kirchner’s decision failed to provide an adequate remedyat law for juvenilesillegally sentenced to life without parole. “Thus, as Berg correctly argues in his supplementalbrief, ‘Mr. Berg must be granteda resentencing hearing where the five Miller factors [outlined in Gutierrez] are the controlling factors before the sentencing court, not the miscellaneousfactors dictated in ... section 1170, subdivision (d)(2).’” Ud. at p. 439.) Kirchneralso created a split of authority in the courts of appeal by holding that post-conviction conduct can only be considered by a court conducting a re-sentencing hearing under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). In People v. Lozano, the Second District Court of Appeal reiterated this Court’s holding in Gutierrez and rejected the Attorney General’s argument that Ms. Lozano could only present post-conviction conduct at an Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) re-sentencing hearing. (People v. Lozano, supra, 243 Cal.App.4th at p. 1138.) The Second District dismissed this argument as having been thoroughly rejected by the California Supreme Court in Gutierrez. (Ibid.) The Lozano court held post-conviction behavior can be relevant and admissible at a Miller/Gutierrez re-sentencing. In the Lozanocase, Ms. Lozano was16 years old in 1996 whenshe participated in the murder of a 13-year-old girl and was sentencedto life without parole. (People v. Lozano, supra, 243 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1129-1130.) In 2015, the court held a re- sentencing hearing pursuant to Miller/Gutierrez and refused to admit evidence ofherrehabilitation in prison. (/d. at p. 1132.) The Second District 20 Court of Appeal reversed this decision by the trial court and held the California Supreme Court in Gutierrez specifically found the sentencing court must consider any evidenceorother informationin the recordthat supported a possibility of rehabilitation. (/d. at pp. 1137-1138, citing Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at p. 1390.) It further held section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) is not exclusive, noris it a substitute for the Eighth Amendmentright to a sentencing hearing that would consider amenability towards rehabilitation. (Lozano at p. 1138.) Thus, Lozano correctly applied this Court’s holding in Gutierrez. The Kirchner court did not. Til. INREKIRCHNER CONTRAVENESCALIFORNIA LAW THAT HAS TRADITIONALLY GRANTED HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF TO OFFENDERS SERVING AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE. The court in Kirchner refused to follow a long line of precedent dictating that habeas corpusrelief is the proper remedyforan illegal sentence. Habeas corpus review is the proper remedy when a court imposed an illegal sentence. (People v. Belmontes (1983) 34 Cal.3d 335, 348, fn.8.) California courts have traditionally applied habeas corpusrelief when this Court has issued decisions changing sentencing laws because giving retroactive effect to changes in sentencing law is not overly burdensome on the courts. (See People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 530, fn.13; Belmontes, supra, 34 Cal.3d at p. 348, fn.8; People v. Navarro (1972) 7 Cal.3d 248, 265, fn. 13; People v. Tenorio (1970) 3 Cal.3d 89, 95, fn.2; In re Jackson (1964) 61 Cal.2d 500, 505-508; People v. Hannon (1971) 5 Cal.3d 330, 340 fn.7, and In re Johnson (1970) 3 Cal.3d 404, 415.) The appellate court misapplied the holding from Jn re Gandolfo 21 (1984) 36 Cal.3d 889 to justify their reasoning that Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) is an adequate remedy at law for Mr. Kirchner. (Jn re Kirchner, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at p. 1416.) Unlike the instantcase, the Gandolfo court dealt with a person seeking relief from a conservatorship order that was subject to review every six months under the Lanterman- Petris-Short Act (LPS Act). The Gandolfo court cautioned that the conservatee would still be entitled to habeasrelief if the limitations of the statutory review were shown to be inadequate. (Jn re Gandolfo,at pp. 899- 900.) As discussed in greater detail below, the rationale in Gandolfo should not be appliedto an illegal criminal sentence, because the “relief” afforded to a defendant under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) is grossly inadequate and cannotpass constitutional muster (People v. Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at p. 1387.) IV. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY GRANTED MR. KIRCHNER’S HABEASPETITION UNDERMILLER/GUTIERREZ Thetrial court properly found Mr. Kirchner wasservingan illegal sentence under Miller/Gutierrez and granted his habeaspetition. Both the superior court and Fourth District Court of Appeal agree Mr. Kirchner was illegally sentencedto life without parole in 1994, But the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s insistence that Mr. Kirchner seek potential relief via Penal Codesection 1170, subdivision (d)(2) does not relieve him from serving an illegal sentence. (In re Kirchner, supra, 244 Cal.App.4th at p. 1419.) 22 A. Montgomery v. Louisiana Held the Decisions in Miller and Gutierrez Are Retroactive. On January 25, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court held their decision in Miller y. Alabama, supra, 132 S.Ct. 2455, applies retroactively to juveniles servinglife without parole and that collateral review is the proper avenue to correctthis illegal sentence. (Montgomery v. Louisiana, supra, 136 S.Ct. 718.) Mr. Montgomery wasserving a sentenceoflife without parole for killing a deputy sheriff in Baton Rouge, Louisiana in 1963, at age 17. (/d. at p. 725.) After the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller, Mr. Montgomery soughtcollateral relief and the Louisiana courts refused to apply the decision in Miller retroactively. (/d. at p. 726.) In Montgomery, the Supreme Court ruled, “... when a new substantive rule of constitutional law controls the outcomeofa case, the Constitution requires state collateral review courts to give retroactive effect to that rule.” (Ud. at p. 729.) The Montgomery court reiterated the foundationsfor their decision in Miller: “Miller took as its starting premise the principle established in Roper and Grahamthat‘children are constitutionally different from adults for 79°purposes of sentencing.’ (Montgomery v. Louisiana, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 733, citing Miller, supra, 132 S.Ct. at p. 2464, citing Roperv. Simmons (2004) 543 U.S. 551, 569-570 (Roper), and Graham v. Florida (2010) 560 U.S. 48, 68 (Graham).). “Protection against disproportionate punishmentis the central substantive guarantee of the Eighth Amendmentand goes far beyond the manner of determining a defendant’s sentence.” (Montgomery at pp. 732-733.) The Court affirmed the holdings in Miller, that a mere reference to youth wasnot enough,thetrial court must actually considerthe distinctive attributes of youth. (/d. at p. 734, citing Miller, supra, 132 S.Ct. at p. 2465.) 23 Becauseajuvenile offender whose crimesreflect the transient immaturity of youth faces a punishmentthat the law cannot impose upon him, Miller announced a new substantive constitutional rule of law that requires retroactive application. (Montgomery v. Louisiana, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 734.) The trial court did not give due deference to the Miller factors, thus Mr. Kirchneris serving an unconstitutional sentence. Retroactive effect is appropriate through California’s collateral review proceedings. (See Teague v. Lane, supra, 489 U.S. 288; Schriro v. Summerlin, supra, 542 U.S. 348; Montgomery, supra, 136 S.Ct. at p. 731.) | Faced with the constitutional concerns raised in Miller, this Court affirmed in Gutierrez that the presumption of sentencing a juvenileto life without parole under Penal Code section 190.5 was unconstitutional. “In light of Miller's reasoning, a sentenceoflife without parole under section 190.5, subdivision (b) would raise serious constitutional concernsif it were imposed pursuant to a statutory presumption in favor of such punishment.” (People v. Gutierrez, supra, 58 Cal.4th at p. 1379.) ““The distinctive attributes of youth diminish the penological justifications for imposing the harshest sentences on juvenile offenders, even when they commit terrible crimes.’ ” (Id. at p. 1380 emphasis added bythe court, citing Miller, supra, 132 S.Ct. at p. 2465.) This presumption wasnot remedied by the sentencing court’s power to consider an individualized sentencing for the youth since serious constitutional issues arise whenthe court is “...presuming ‘[i]n the first instance’that life without parole is the appropriate sentence for special circumstance murder committed by a 16- or 17-year-old juvenile.” (/d.at p. 1382,citing People v. Guinn (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 1130, 1142.) 24 Although, Mr. Kirchner was sentenced two weeksprior to this Court’s decision in Guinn,the trial court gavelittle or no weight to the Miller factors at Mr. Kirchner’s sentencing hearing. Mr. Kirchner was sentenced primarily due to the circumstances of the offense. Instead of addressing the Miller factors, the court reasoned the U.S. Supreme Court had not ruled out imposition of the death penalty on a juvenile, thus a sentence of life without parole would be constitutional. The trial court failed to address Mr. Kirchner’s lack of a prior record, the violence he suffered asa child in his homeand neighborhood,his head injuries, his diagnosis for ADHD and depression,or his two suicide attempts. More importantly, the court ignored the recommendation by CYA that there was a reasonablepossibility that he could be rehabilitated within the jurisdiction time available. The court sentenced Mr. Kirchner to what has now been deemed an illegal sentence oflife without parole. Becausethetrial court and the court of appeal both determined Mr. Kirchneris serving anillegal sentence,heis entitled to collateralrelief. CONCLUSION Thetrial court properly granted Mr. Kirchner’s habeaspetition. Binding authority from the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life without parole for a juvenile offender violates the Eighth Amendment. The Montgomery court clarified that the Miller ruling is retroactive and applies to offenders such as Mr. Kirchner who haveproperly soughtcollateralrelief. This Court’s decision in Gutierrez rightly determined that Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2) fails to satisfy the constitutional mandate announced in Miller. (People v. Gutierrez, supra; People v. Lozano, supra, In re Berg, 25 supra.) In re Kirchner was wrongly decided andif allowed to stand will result in continued Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendmentviolations to hundreds ofjuveniles illegally sentencedto life without parole. Clarity from this Court is necessary to resolve the split of authority within the courts of appeal in In re Berg, supra, and People v. Lozano, supra. Mr. Kirchneris currently serving an illegal sentence andis entitled to a resentencing hearing or, in the alternative, to be resentencedto life with the possibility of parole. Dated: June 17, 2016 Respectfully submitted, RANDY MIZE Primary Public Defender By; ““ABBEY4-NOEL | Deputy Public Defender Attorneys for Petitioner KRISTOPHER KIRCHNER 26 CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT I, ABBEY J. NOEL,hereby certify that based on the software in the word processor program, the word countfor this documentis 6,386 words. Dated: 6/17/16 Respectfully submitted, RANDYMIZE Primary Public Defender By: “NOE Public Defender Attorneys for Petitioner KRISTOPHER KIRCHNER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Rule 1,21 (c) CASE NAME:Jn re Kirchner nanan : - TE Supreme Ct. No.: S233508 o Ct. Appeal 4" DCA,Div. 1 No.: D067920. Super. Ct No.: HC21804,CRN26291 I, Michael A. Owens,declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am nota party to this action; my business addressis 450 "B" Street, Suite 900, San Diego, California 92101, in said County and State. On June 17, 2016, I served the foregoing document: PETITIONER’S OPENING BRIEF ON THEMERITS on the parties stated below, by the following meansofservice: BY INTEROFFICE MAIL: Pursuant to Rule 1.21(b), on the above-mentioned date I personally deposited in the United States Mail true and correct copies thereof, each in a separate envelope, postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following [See Service List]. . BY PERSONAL SERVICE: Onthe date of execution of this document, I personally served true and correct copies of the above-mentioned document(s) on each ofthe following [See Service List]. BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: From my e-mail accountat Michael.Owens@sdcounty.ca.gov, I caused each such documentto be transmitted electronically, to the parties and websites indicated, authorized under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.71. [See ServiceList]. BY E-MAIL: On the above-mentioned date, I caused a true copy of said documenttobe emailed to said parties’ e-mail addresses as indicated on the attached Service List. (Rules of Court, Rule 2.251(c)(1)) (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury underthe lawsofthe State of California that the foregoingis true and correct. Executed on 6/17/16 Michael A. Owens Declarant i s a E e A E I N A R R S s S a t i n e SERVICE LIST Clerk of the Superior Court Judge Hanoian “© JUDICIAL SERVICES 220 W. Broadway San Diego, Ca 92101-3409 Phone: (619) 450-5500 (personal service on 6/20/16) Bonnie Dumanis San Diego County District Attorney Attn: DDA Jennifer Kaplan 330 W. Broadway, 8" Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 531-3544 Jennifer.kaplan@sdcda.org (TrueFiling electronic service) Court of Appeals — 4"° DCA.Div.1 Attn: Clerk of the Court 750 “B”Street, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 744-0760 (TrueFiling electronic service) Kamala D.Harris California Attorney General Attn: Appellate Division 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 645-2001 sdag.docketing@doj.ca.gov (TrueFiling electronic service) Mr. KRISTOPHER KIRCHNER (through counsel) Appendix A D a t a A n a l y s i s U n i t E s t i n a t e s a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e c t i o n O f f e n d e r I n f o r m a t i o n S e r v i c e s B r a n c h O f f e n s e N a m e ‘ D a t e AO BI NS ON , AA RO N SA M, SA VI N S O T O , M A R I O UY , RA TT AN Y KU PS CH , RO NA LD AT LA S, TY SO N WI LT ON , AN TH ON Y RU SS EL L; DA NI EL PE AR SO N, CA LV IN GU IL LE N, JO SE GA RR AS GO , AN GE L R O F E M A N , K Y L E BL AC KW EL L, BR AD LE Y HE RN AN DE Z, AN TH ON Y TH OM AS , ED WA RD DA VI S, DE VI N SI AC KA SO RN , JI MM Y SI LV A, JE SS E PE RE Z, JE SS E AB EL LA , FR AN K LE WI S, JE RR ET T RU IZ , IG NA CT O PA LA FO X, LU TS ST RA TI S, GH RI ST OP HE R A Y A L A , O T R A M RA MI RE Z, C U S LU CE RG , NA TH AN OR TE GA , CU TS RO LO AN , JU AN CA RD EN AS ,. JO SE HE RA Z, VI CT OR RO UA S, OR LA ND O MA RQ UE Z, WI CT OR M O G U T C H E N , R A Y E DU BO SE , GA RL OS MU RR AY , -D EJ ON 05 /2 4/ 20 04 44 /2 6/ 20 03 0 8 / 1 7 / 2 0 0 5 02 /0 8/ 20 08 02 /2 8/ 20 08 04 / 22 72 00 8 12 /o 2f 20 08 04 71 67 20 06 04 /4 5/ 20 06 08 /2 8/ 20 08 03 /1 2/ 20 08 08 /0 4/ 20 08 02 /0 7/ 20 07 o1 /i e/ 2d 0a 0 8 / 1 4 / 2 0 0 4 fa y1 9 72 00 7 06 /0 8/ 20 08 07 /1 9/ 20 08 06 /0 77 20 08 08 /0 9/ 20 07 61 /1 9/ 20 08 os yf oa je no s 03 /1 9/ 20 08 {2 17 7/ 20 06 08 /2 7/ 20 07 02 /7 8/ 20 06 1 4 / 0 4 / 2 0 0 7 12 /1 7/ 20 08 08 /2 7 (2 00 7 02 3/ 28 ( 2 0 0 7 ob /n 2/ z0 09 0 6 / 2 8 / 2 0 6 9 08 /2 2/ 20 09 0 3 7 2 6 / 2 0 1 0 05 /: 47 4, / 20 07 " 1 2 / 0 9 / 2 0 0 7 . S e n t e n c e B e g i n D a t e ne /2 e/ 20 09 0 9 / 2 9 / 2 0 0 9 0 9 / 2 9 / 2 0 0 0 70 /0 9/ 20 09 10 /0 9/ 20 09 10 72 9 /2 00 9 42 /0 4/ 20 09 7 1 / 1 6 / 2 0 0 9 4 9 7 1 8 / 2 0 0 8 42 /0 4 7 2 0 0 8 42 /3 1/ 20 08 10 76 8/ 20 10 04 /2 0/ 20 10 04 7 12 /2 01 0 C B S 2 0 1 0 05 /2 6/ 20 10 06 /2 5/ 20 16 06 /1 8/ 20 19 . 0 7 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 0 6 9 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 0 09 74 7 /2 01 8 09 72 97 20 10 06 /0 7/ 20 33 ya fi as 2d i0 12 /0 8 72 01 0 02 /1 8/ 20 11 04 /0 5/ 20 11 0 4 / 0 6 / 2 0 1 1 04 71 97 20 11 ob y0 9/ 20 07 0 8 / 1 7 7 2 0 1 4 40 /0 5/ 20 11 1 0 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 Jo y1 es 20 it 12 /9 5/ 20 44 1 2 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 1 A g e at O f f e n s e 16 w 17 IF 16 16 i F 4 6 16 7 17 46 7 17 17 IF 16 1 6 i7 17 17 16 16 7 A? 16 7 17 16 47 16 8 Ww ? 17 17 17 +7 C o u n t y o f C o n v i c t i o n Lo s, A n g e l e s S a n t a C l a r a R i v e r s i d e Sa n Jo ag ui n L o s A n g e l e s Sa n. S a r n a r d i n a A l a m e d a S a c r a m e n t o S a c r a m e n t o Lo s. A n g e l e s Tu la re K e r n S o n o m a Lo s. An ge le s S a n D i e g o L o s A n g e l e s Sa cr am en to Lo s: An ge le s. Ke rn S a c r a m e n t o R i v e r s i d e O r a n g e K e r n Lo s. A n g e l e s O r a n g e or an ge R i v e r s i d e V e n t u r a O r a n g e Ba n do aq ui n V e n t u r a S a n t a C l a r a T u l a r e C o n t r a C e s t e Sa n. 8 e r n a r d i n a S a c r a m e n t o D e p a r t e e n t o f C o r r e c t i o n s a n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e of C a l i f o r n i a O c t o b e r 2 0 1 s I n s t i t u t i o n S a l i n a s Va li cs y St at e. P r i s d n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e : P r i s o n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n Ca li fo rn ia Co rr ec ti on al Ce nt er N o r t h K e r n S t a t e P r i g o n I r o n w o o d S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i p a t r i a S t a t e P r i s o n K e r Va bl ey St at e Pr is on H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a M e d i c a l F a c i l i t y fe nt in el a St at e Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a C o r r e t t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n K e r n V a l l e y St at e. P r i s o n ‘H ig h De se rt St at e Pr is on Hi gh De se rt St at e P r i s o n ba li fo ti ia St at e Pr is on , Co rc or an Pe li ca n Ba y St at e: Pr is on C a l i p a t r i a S t a t e P r i s o n Hi gh De se rt St at e. Pr is on K e r n V a l l e y : S t a t e P r i s o n Ir on wo od St at e Pr is on No rt h: K e r n “S ta te P r i s c n Ca li pa tr ia st at e Pr is on Ga li fa co ia St at e. Pr is dn , Lo s An ge le s Co un ty C a l i f o r n i a M e d i c a l F a c i l i t y No rt h Ke rn St at e’ Pr is on Pe li ca n: Ba y. St at e Pr is on P e l i c a n B a y S t a t e P r i s o n P e l i c a n B a y S t a t e P r i s o n G e n t i n e l a S t a t e . P r i s a n Ke rn Ya ll ey St at e Pr is on C a l i p a t r i a ‘S ta te . P r i s o n Ke rn Va ll ey St at e: Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e . P r i s o n , C o r c o r a n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e Pr is dy ,. Lo s. A n g e l e s C o u n t y C a n t i n d l a S t a t e p r i s e d T h e s e d a t a v a l u e s w a y d i f f e r t r e e t h o s e p r e v i o u s l y p u b l i s h e d d u é t o d a t a b a s e u p d a t e s , R E F E R E N C E : W E \ O T E B \ D A U Y S A S \ D A U O a \ A d _ 4 H o c \ 2 0 1 s . 1 O \ u n d a r t é L w o p s - R e v D G ~ OU TP UT S. W : \ O 1 S B \ D A U \P r o j e c t s \D AU OE Ad :{ _ H o e ( 2 0 1 5 - 1 0 \ U n d e r 4B . LW OP S. w i t h S e n t e n c e D a t e 0 0 0 0 0 1 b a t a A n a l y s i s . u n i t E s t i m a t e s : a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e e t i o n O f f e n d e r I n f o r m a t i o n S e r v i c e s . B r a n c h N a w e CH AV EZ , L E O P O L D O EL IA S, ED WA RD G O M E Z , D A V T O NO SE S, DA VI D BI BT AN G, VI CT OR ME RA Z, uU AN SE E, TO NY AB RA M, KE VI N P E R E Z , C H R I S T I A N SA LD AN A, JO SE Tr an , Tr ue G U Z M A N , H A R U E L S P E A K E R , C H R I S T I A N RE NT ER IA , JO SE GA LL AR OO , GT OV AN NT VA LL ES ; RA YM ON D LU AM AS ,. A U R E L T O GA ST AN ED A, JE SU S SA NT AN A, ED GA R M E N D O Z A , J O H N N Y NC GH EE , DI AM ON TE N A R G U E Z , G O N Z A L O Co x, UO HN HE ND ER SO N, PH IL LI P JI ME NE Z, SA LV AD OR KA K, RA TT AN AK LO PE Z; GE RA RD D CR IS LE R, RO BE RT GA RZ A, JU LT AN SE SS IN G, . NA TH AN BY LE SK I, SC OT T O' BR IE N, BE AN C U E L L A A , E D W A R D TA YL OR . LE TF VA NG , CO MD Y GA LV EZ ; BA VI D 0 0 0 0 0 2 O f f e n s e f a t e 0 9 / 2 5 / 1 9 9 3 0 9 / 2 5 / 1 9 9 2 1 2 / 1 4 / 2 0 0 9 6 4 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 0 0 9 / 2 0 / 2 0 0 8 0 9 / 2 0 7 2 0 0 8 06 /0 87 20 11 0 9 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 8 40 /0 1 # 2 0 0 4 6 7 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 1 0 2 / 2 4 / 1 9 9 5 6 5 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 4 1 0 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 0 8 / 0 2 / 2 0 0 8 4 0 / 1 8 / 2 0 7 4 04 /3 1/ 20 12 , 0 1 / 1 7 / 2 0 0 9 4 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 0 3 / 4 9 / 2 0 1 0 a g / 2 5 / 2 0 1 0 1 0 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 4 o a 1 5 / 1 9 8 1 4 2 / 2 0 / 1 9 5 3 o s ti s 4 9 8 2 o s s 1 6 / 2 0 0 4 4 0 7 1 0 / 2 0 0 3 4 9 7 0 2 7 2 0 0 2 . 03 /0 5/ 20 04 08 /2 9/ 20 05 12 /0 3/ 20 04 90 71 54 20 08 02 /2 6/ 20 03 0 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 0 8 65 /3 1 71 99 8 04 /0 2 72 00 5 03 /2 6/ 20 05 S e n t e n c e Ba gi n D a t e 05 /1 8/ 20 12 0 6 / 2 5 / 2 0 4 2 08 /2 5/ 20 12 14 /0 2/ 20 42 42 /2 1 (2 01 2 42 /2 4/ 20 12 1 2 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 o4 / 18 /2 01 3 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 3 0 6 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 3 OF (2 4/ 20 13 41 /0 1/ 20 18 14 /2 1/ 20 13 y2 41 1/ 20 18 ag si s/ 20 i4 08 /0 6/ 20 14 0 8 / 1 2 / 2 0 7 4 . 12 /1 6/ 20 14 0 2 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 5 06 /2 3/ 20 15 : O7 / 10 /2 01 5 1 0 / 9 3 ) 1 9 8 4 08 /0 3/ 19 85 8 ) 11 71 98 6 9 2 / 0 2 / 2 0 0 6 0 7 / 2 0 / 2 0 0 6 0 6 / 3 0 ( 2 0 0 6 0 7 / 0 5 / 2 0 0 6 08 /1 1/ 20 06 . 0 8 / 0 6 / 2 0 0 6 10 /3 1 ( 2 0 0 6 4 1 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 6 4 0 / 2 4 / 2 0 0 6 1 0 / 3 1 / 2 0 0 6 1 4 7 1 7 / 2 0 0 6 44 07 /2 00 6 A g e a t o f f e n s e 4 7 17 16 V7 17 16 . 17 17 17 47 {7 17 17 17 16 {7 ‘7 V7 16 17 i? 14 {7 16 . 1 ? te 17 7? 7 17 16 {6 46 1é 7 16 G e a n t y o f C e n v i c t i o n S a n D i e g o Sa n Di eg e Sa n Ba rn ar di ne Ke rn Lo s An ge le s bo s: An ge le s T u l a r e M a r i n Lo s: A n g e l e s K i n g s : Or an ge . R i v e r s i d e S a n t a C r u z to s. A n g e l e s Lo s A n g e l e s S a n J o a q u i n T u l a r e T u l a r e Lo s A n g e l e s L u s A n g e l e s Lo s. A n g é l e s Lo s: A n g e l e s S a n t a C l a r a : Ga n. F r a n c i s c a S a n o n a Sa n. J o a q u i n o r a n g e Sa cr am en to K e r n V e n t u r a - G o n t r a C o s t a E L D o r a d o Ri ve rs id e Lo s An ge le s. Sa n. v o a q u i n D e p a r t m e n t o f C o r r e c t i o n s . a n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a ‘ O c t o b e r 2 0 1 6 I n s t i t u t i o n C a l i f o r n i a I n s t i t u t i o n f o r M e o C a l i f o r n i a I n s t i t u t i o n f o r M e n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y C a l i f o r n i a M e d i c a l F a c i l i t y Ca li pa tr ia St at e Pr is on K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n We rt h. K e r n S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r a t a C o r r e c t i a n a l C e n t e r Sa n: h u e n t i n S t a t e P r i s o n R d D o n o v a n G a r r e c t i o n a l F a c i l i t y Ca li pa tr ia St at e Pr is on Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Lo s An gé le s Co un ty K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , C o r c o r a n A d D o n o v a n . G o r r e c t i o n a l . F a c i l i t y H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n c e n t i n e l a ‘S ta te P r i s o n S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i p a t r i a S t a t e P r i s o n N o r t h K e r n S t a t e P r i s a n G a l i f o r n i a I n s t i t u t i o n f o r M e n Pe li ca n. B a y St at e. P r i s o n R u D o n o v a n C o r r e c t i o n a l F a c i l i t y M u l e C r e e k S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s e n , S a c r a m e n t o S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n Ge nt in ea la S t a r e P r i s o n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n Hi gh De se ct St at e. Pr is on Ca li fo rn ia Su bs ta nc e Ab us e Tr ea tm en t Fa ci li ty Ga li fa ra ia St at e Pr is on , Co re sr an C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , C o r c o r a n Ke rn Va li ey S t a t e Pr is en C a t t i n e l a S t a t e P r i s o n Pl ea sa nt Va ll ey St at e Pr is on Ge nt in el a S ta te , Pr is on Th es e. d a t a v a l u e s ‘a ay d i f f e r f r o m t h o s e . p r e v i o w t y p u b l i s h e d du a’ ta : d a t a b a s e u p d a t e s . RE FE RE NC E: .W : \ OT S8 \W AU NS AS (D AU DE \A d_ f 2 0 1 5 - A G \ u n d e r t s LW OP S: = R e v D C B U T P U T ? W \ O T S B \ B A U \ P r a j e p t s \ D A U O R \ A d JH o d \ 2 0 1 5 - 7 0 \ U n d e r 1B LW OP S: w i t h S e n t e n c e . f a t e D a t a A n a l y s i s U n i t E s t i m a t e s a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e c t i o n O f f e n d e r I n f a r w a t i o n S e r v i c e s B r a n c h N a m e DI AZ , JO HN TS AV EV , MA KS IM RI VE RA , ‘S AU L BE NS ON , JI MM Y S I O R D I A , F R E D D Y MO ND RA GO N, GI AN CA RL O GA RG IA , DA VI D RH OW E, J A M A L MA RT IN EZ , IS AA C SO LI S, JU AN MU RR AY , CH RI ST OP HE R RI VE RA , FE RN AN DO TO NT AE RA S, AN DR ES SA ND OV AL , SO DO LF O BU NN , RE GI NA LD MI NO R, . AN TO NI O AV EN DA NG ,. DI EG O SE E, LA VA NG AL FR ED , EV AN SO TO -E NR IQ UE Z, MI GU EL CO TT ON , JO HN NY DO NA LD , DE ON TE SE E, CH AW A G A U Z , E D W I N FL OR ES , RA LP H PE RE Z, DA NI EL . M O F F E T T , A N D R E W GA LL EG OS , GE OR GE ZA VA LA , E D G A R MY ER S, -A OB ER T J AE OT UL ,. P E N I F O T Y SU AR EZ , JO SE SA LC IN O, MA RC OS FE RN AN DE Z. JO HN CU EL LA B; ST EV EN WH IT E, CH RI ST OP HE R O f f e n s e B a t e 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 0 4 46 /0 4/ 20 05 02 /0 2/ 20 08 03 /2 5/ 20 04 10 /0 8/ 80 05 08 /2 3/ 20 03 05 /1 9/ 20 08 io s pe s 20 04 08 /2 8/ 20 12 01 /2 9/ 20 06 04 /0 3/ 20 06 01 /2 7/ 20 04 03 /2 7/ 20 05 05 /0 5/ 20 04 03 /0 8/ 20 06 03 /0 9/ 20 06 1 2 / 0 2 / 2 0 0 4 {0 70 4/ 20 06 G6 /2 7/ .2 00 7 c a / i t / 2 0 0 8 o4 j2 e/ a0 08 94 /0 8/ 20 08 T O T /Z OU 8 04 /0 8/ 20 07 0 5 / 4 4 / 1 9 9 9 07 (2 6/ 20 08 0 4 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 5 , 10 /2 9/ 20 06 . 0 1 f 1 3 / 2 0 0 7 0B ) 14 /2 00 4 12 /a 07 e0 08 0 5 / 1 5 / 2 0 0 6 4 4 / 1 4 / 2 0 0 7 08 /1 6/ 20 07 44 jo a/ 20 08 03 /1 6/ 20 05 S e n t e n c e . Be gi n D a t e 4 2 7 0 8 / 2 0 0 6 0 4 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 7 6 3 / 0 2 / 2 0 0 7 08 /2 2/ 20 07 03 70 8/ 20 07 oF (2 0/ 20 07 40 /1 8/ 20 07 42 /1 4/ 20 07 01 /0 8/ 20 13 42 72 07 20 07 14 :/ 20 12 00 7 12 /2 8/ 20 07 01 (2 57 20 08 01 78 0/ 20 08 ot /s e/ en oa ot / s a / 2 0 0 8 oz yr o7 72 00 8 08 /0 5/ 20 08 09 /2 2/ 20 08 06 /1 7/ 20 08 06 /1 7/ 20 08 0 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 8 07 /0 3/ 20 08 o7 y2 g7 an 08 oo ; 17 f2 00 8 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 8 10 /1 7/ 26 08 11 /2 4/ 20 08 01 /2 6/ 20 09 O 2 7 4 8 / 2 0 0 9 0 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 0 9 03 70 57 20 09 0 4 7 0 7 1 2 0 0 8 . 05 /2 7/ 20 09 Ag e. a t O f f e n s e 16 49 16 17 16 17 17 16 20 16 7 16 is 1? i? 47 i7 16 16 46 17 47 16 17 +7 1 ? A? 16 i7 17 16 is t? 47 16 7 ‘G ou nt y of G o n v i e t i o n t o s An ge le s. S a c r a m e n t o L a s A n g e l e s S a n J o a q u i n B u t t e Or an ge F u l a r e S a n B e r n a r d i n o Lo s An ge de s Lo s A n g e l e s t o s A n g e l e s R i v e r s i d e T u l a r e V e n t u r a S a c r a m e n t o S a c r a m e a t o Lo s. A n g e l e s T u l a r e G o s A n g e l e s S a c r a m e n t o S a c r a m e n t o A l a w e d a T u l a r e Lo s. A n g e l e s Lo s: A n g e l e s S a c t a m e n t o G o n t r a C a s t a L o s A n g e l e s K e r n da n D i e y e Sa n. D i e g o Or an ge . Co s: An ge le s Tu la re . Lo s» An ge le s Sa n B e r v a r d i n g : De pa rt ii en t of C a r r e c t i o n s a n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a O c t o b e r 2 0 4 5 f a s t i t u t i o n Ke rn Va ll ey St at e Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a S u b s t a n c e A b u s e T r e a t s e n t F a c i l i t y T r o n w o o d S t a t e P r i s o n ‘ G a l i f o r n i a G o r r e c t i o n a l t h a t i t u t i o n Hi gh . De se rt . St at e Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Ga li fo ri ia St at e. Pr is on ; é r c o r a n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , to s. A n g e l e s C o u n t y ‘S al in as V a l l a y S t a t e P r i s o n C e n t i n e l a S t a t e P r i s e n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s a n , Lo s A n g e l e s C o u n t y C a l i p a t e i a St at e. Pr is on . G a l i f e r n i a G o r r e c t i o n a l . I n s t i t u t i o n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , C o r c d r a n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , O n r e c e r a n G a l i f o r n i a Co rr ec ti on al . I n s t i t u t i o n Sa li na s. Va ll ey St at e Pr is on Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on ;, Co rc or an De ve l. V o r a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n N o r t h K e c n S t a t e P r i s o n G a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S d l a n e Ca li fo rn ia St at e’ Pr is eh , Co rc or an G a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s a n , L o s A n g e l e s C a u n t y Sa ni Q u é n t i n S t a t e P r i s o n Sa li na s. V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n Sa li na s Va ll ey St at e Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Ke rn Va ll ey St at e Pr is on Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Sa cr am en to G a l i p a t r i a S t a t e P r i s o n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s s h I r o n w o o d S t a t a P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a St at e: P r i s o n ; ‘S ac ra me nt o Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Lo s An ge le s Co un ty C e l i f o r n i a Su bs ta nc e: A b u s e Tr éa tm en t. F a c i l i t y T h e s e d a t a v a l u e s m a y di ff er . t r o m t h o s e p r e v i b u s l y p u b l i s h e d : di te t i d a t a b a s e up ii at es . 0 0 0 0 0 3 RE FE RE ND E: W s O1 SB \O AU \S AS \D AU DS \A d_ Ho 4 8 - 1O lu nd er ts . - W O P S - R e w D e O U T P U T : W 2 \ O D S E D A U ) P r o j ec ts \ D A U G 6 \ A da n ) 2 0 1 6 O \ U n d e r 1 8 L W O P S w i t h S e n t e n c e b a t e D a t a A n a l y s i s : U n i t E s t i m a t e s a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s s e c t i o n O f f e n d e r I a f o r m a t i a o n S e r v i c e s B r a n c h N a m e GA ON G, ME KI AD DE RL EY , OU KW AN RA MO S, OS VA LD O BA UT IS TA , CU LS HE AR N, RA LP H LY NC H, DA VI D TH RO OP , ED WA RD MO RA ,. OS CA R LU LU , FA AF ET A AD KI NS , DA VI D GU IN N, AN A GA AN IC A, . JO SE PA YT ON , DE SM ON D G I N E S , M I C H A E L ES PI NO ZA , CA ND E HO BL EY , LE ON JO NE S, KE VI N AU SS EL L, MI CH AE L SA NC HE Z, BE NI GN O V I E R A , F E R N A N D O DO MI NG UE Z, MA RV IN PE RE Z, FR AN CI SC O HO OR E, DE AN DR E RU SG EL L, AT HA IN SP AN N, TR OY PU LI OO , MI CH AE L FL OR ES , FA BT AN HE R, CH A K I R C H N E R , K R I S T O P H E R S E I D E L , D A V I O ‘ RU SK , OA NT EL WA RD , RA YM ON G GA VI S, M I C H A E L CU RT IS , EL LT S BO NI LL A, RE NE co ok , FO WA RD O f f e n s e D a t e 1 2 / 2 0 / 2 0 0 6 o 4 / 4 5 / 2 0 0 6 0 4 / 9 8 / 2 0 0 7 O B / 2 7 / 2 0 0 7 0 7 / 2 3 / 1 9 9 6 0 7 { 2 3 7 1 9 8 0 O 4 7 0 7 / 1 9 9 4 04 74 07 79 91 02 /4 27 99 91 o g y 2 4 7 4 9 9 1 10 /1 97 19 90 08 /0 6/ 19 91 os /c as 19 92 qo so 4d ; 19 92 O 7 / G 5 1 8 9 6 06 /0 8/ 19 91 93 /6 8/ 19 82 08 /2 7/ 19 92 04 /3 9/ 19 92 40 /0 3/ 19 91 . 10 /7 2/ 18 91 o a i7 77 i9 82 42 /0 3/ 19 01 42 /0 9/ 15 91 03 /e R/ 19 92 08 /2 4/ 19 62 4 2 7 4 2 7 1 9 9 0 2 0 4 / 0 9 / 1 9 9 3 04 72 8) 15 93 # 4 2 6 7 1 9 9 09 /1 7/ 19 93 4 0 7 1 4 7 4 8 9 3 oB /o t/ 19 93 08 /2 1/ 19 99 oe o a y 1 5 9 2 08 /2 1/ 19 94 S a n t e n c e B e g i n D a t e 0 8 / 2 0 / 2 0 0 9 0 6 / 1 0 / 2 0 0 9 0 6 / 1 7 / 2 0 0 9 0 7 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 9 1 2 / 4 9 / 1 8 9 1 0 1 7 1 5 7 1 9 9 2 0 4 / 0 8 / 1 9 9 2 0 9 / 8 0 / 1 9 9 2 4 / 0 8 7 4 9 9 3 0 4 / 0 7 / 1 9 9 3 0 4 / 2 9 / 1 9 9 3 0 8 / 2 3 7 1 9 9 3 oa yt i 7 1 9 9 8 0 8 7 4 3 7 1 9 9 3 0 8 / 2 4 / 1 9 9 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 9 9 9 4 0 / 2 7 / 1 8 9 3 0 1 / 3 1 / 1 9 9 6 4 1 / 0 4 / 1 9 9 8 0 2 / 7 5 / 1 9 9 4 4 2 7 1 5 7 1 3 0 3 OL / O 7 / 1 8 9 4 6 2 / 0 9 / 1 9 0 4 0 2 / 0 9 / 1 9 9 4 o 3 / o a / i g 9 4 04 /0 6/ 19 94 08 1 8 / 1 9 0 4 40 /1 8/ 19 94 14 /0 8/ 19 94 . F P 1 0 / 1 0 9 4 07 /0 6/ 19 95 07 /2 7/ 19 95 a 7 / e i s 1 9 e s 08 /1 0/ 19 95 8 / 0 2 / 1 9 9 5 09 /2 2/ 19 05 Ag e. a t o f f e n s e 17 18 16 17 16 1 8 1? 1é 16 16 i7 1 i6 1 6 17 17 if IF 17 16 16 17 16 1¢ 1 6 16 . 16 16 18 16 16 1? 17 17 7 1 6 Go un ty .. of : C o n v i c t i o n S a n U i e g o ta s. A n g e l e s L e s A n g e l e s . F r e s n o La s. An ge le s Lo s A n g e l e s V e n t u r a Lo s. A n g e l e s Lo s. A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s R i v e r s i d e Sa n. B e r n a c d i n a Sa n. Oi eg e. K e r n L o s A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s Lo s An ge le s K e r n T u l a r e Lo s. A n g e l e s Lo s. A n g e l e s Lo s, At ig et es Sa n: Ma te o: Sa n Ma te o Lo s. A n g e l e s Sa n Ma te o R i v e r s i d e S a n J o a q u i n Sa ni ’ Di eg o Sa n Be rn ar di no So la ti o. Sx uc ra ni en te Sa n: Bé rn ar di nd S a c r a m e n t o . Lo s: A n g e l e s K e r n D e p e r t m e n t o f C o r r e c t i o n s a n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f C a l i f a r d i a Q e t o h e r 2 0 4 5 T o s t i t u t i o n C a l i p a t r i a S t a t e P r i s o n K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s a n R d D o n e v a n C o r r e c t i o n a l F a c i l i t y Sa li na s. V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n K e r n V a l l e y St at e. P r i s o n Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Co rc or an C a l i f o r n i a S u b s t a n c e A b u s e T r e a t m e n t F a c i l i t y C a l i p s t r i s S t a t e P r i s o n Ca li fo rn ia s S t a t e P r i s o n , Lo s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Pl ea sa nt Va ll ey : St at e Pr is on ‘C al if ar ni a. St at e Pr is on , Sa cr am en t Ca li pa tr ia St at e Pr is on C a l i t e r n i a I n s t i t u t i o n f o r M e n - G a l i f o r n i a C o r r e c t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n ‘P el iv an B a y S t a t e P r i s a n Ca li fo rn ia Su bs ta nc e Ab us e Tr ea tm en t Fa ci li ty W a s c o S t a t e P r i s o n Ca li fo rn ia . S t a t e Pr is on , L o s A n g e l e s C a u n t y Ke rn : Va ll ey St at e Pr is on P l e a s a n t Va ll ey . S t a t e P r i s o n H a i fo rn ia Co rr ec ti on al In st it ut io n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n No rt h Ke rn : S t a t e P r i s o n Ke ri Va ll ey St et e Pr is on Ko rn Va ll ey St at e Pr is on Sa li na s: Va ll ey St at e Pr is on K e r n Va ll ey St at e Pr is an Pl ea sa nt : V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n P e t i c a n B a y S t a t e P r i s o n Ce nt in el a St at e Pr is on G a l i t e c c i a St at e. P r i s o n , C o r c o r a n r o n y o o d St at e. P r i s o n Mo le : C r e e k S t a t e P r i s e n . Sa id fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , So la no M u l e C r e e k S t a t e P r i s d n : Mu le . Cr ee k St et e Pr is on Jn as ed at a. va lu es ga y di ff er . tr om t h o s e pr ev io us ly pu bl is he d d u e te da ta ba se up da te s. RE FE RE NC E: W: \O ZS 8\ DA UI SA S\ DA UO G\ Ad _H oc \2 01 5- 10 \u nd er t® LW OP S - Re w OC O U T P U T ? Wé \ O I S B ( D A U P r o j e c t s \ D A U 0 G \ A d H o e \ 2 0 4 5 - 7 0 \ U n d e r 1 8 U N O P S w i t h S e n t e n c e . D a t e 0 0 0 0 0 4 D a t a A n a l y s i s U n i t E s t i m a t e s an d. S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e c t i o n O f f e n d e r I n f o r m a t i o n Sa rv ic es . B r a n c h N a m a BI VE NS , ‘J AM ES T H O M P S O N , M A R T Y A PH IM , V I R E T TA TE , L A V I N SH OW EL L, . F R A N K C A S T I L L O , D U S T Y S A N G H E Z , L U I S L O P E Z , R A M O N J O N E S , A N T O N I O B A Z E , G A R Y R A M I B E Z , R O B E R T N I L A K O U T , T H O N G X A Y D R A Y T O N , H O B E R T H E R N A N D E Z , ‘L AR RY W H I T E , B O B B Y V E L I Z , A R K A N D O HO DG E, R I C H A R D RE AD Y, T S S A C H MA EA , M A U T U G O M E Z , LG UT S: W I L L I A M S , G A R Y W I L S O N , D E R A T C K D E L U N A , O W A Y H E J O N E S . J O B N O Z A E T A , J A I M E BA NG S, R Y A N G O M E Z , A L E J A N D R O J O H N S O N , K E N N Y BO UN PR AS EU TH , BO UP HA A S K E W , D A V I D G A R G T A , J U A N G I B S O N , C L I F T O N C U R O T H E R S , D O N T E J A M E S , J A W A D G U Y , G L E N ‘B RY AN T, R I T C H O f f e n s e Da te : 7 0 / 2 9 7 $ 9 9 3 04 73 95 77 99 4 ot s1 1/ 19 94 O1 /2 ay 19 93 03 /1 6/ 19 94 . o1 / 14 /1 99 3 09 /1 3/ 19 94 09 /1 9/ 19 94 19 /1 8/ 49 94 07 ) 28 7 49 95 08 /0 9/ 19 95 05 /1 8/ 19 94 0 9 / 2 8 / 1 9 9 8 06 /0 5) 19 95 . 08 /2 2/ 19 95 09 /0 2 /i se 5 o a j o s ; 1 9 9 3 to yo i/ 19 89 4 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 3 1 4 / 1 1 49 94 0 8 / 2 8 / 7 9 9 4 . 08 /2 2/ 19 95 7 0 / 2 8 / 1 9 9 4 yo ya 0/ 19 98 64 /2 2) 19 95 1 2 7 1 5 ) 1 9 9 2 09 /2 9/ 19 95 12 70 2/ 49 93 03 /0 4/ 19 85 1 1 7 1 8 / 1 8 9 3 0 8 / 1 8 / 1 9 9 4 o6 /n a/ 19 94 42 /2 6/ 19 95 0 2 7 0 2 7 1 9 9 5 . 0 8 / 0 7 / 4 9 9 5 11 72 57 19 95 S e n t e n c e B e g i n ‘D at e VO T 44 /4 98 5 10 72 77 19 95 12 /2 2/ 49 95 12 /2 0/ 19 95 01 /0 3/ 19 96 : 01 /2 3/ 19 96 05 /2 0/ 20 15 02 /2 8/ 49 86 0 2 / 2 6 / 1 9 9 6 04 /0 8/ 19 96 04 7 15 /1 99 6 04 /2 6/ 19 96 0 6 / 0 5 / 1 9 9 6 06 /1 7/ 19 96 06 /1 79 71 99 6 06 /2 0/ 19 96 07 /2 4/ 49 86 0 7 / 2 9 / 1 9 9 6 0 7 7 3 4 / 1 9 8 6 0 8 / 0 8 / 1 9 9 6 pB /2 2/ 19 96 09 /2 4/ 19 56 . 1 / 1 7 / 1 9 9 6 10 72 17 19 86 1 1 2 7 1 9 9 8 11 72 2/ 19 98 11 /2 1/ 19 96 4 2 / 0 3 / 1 9 9 6 12 /0 5/ 19 96 12 /' 13 71 99 6 12 /0 9/ 19 96 12 /2 6/ 19 96 0 2 / 2 0 / 1 8 9 7 o2 /1 87 19 97 03 /0 4/ 19 97 12 /2 1/ 19 99 A g e a t . of fe ns e. 4 7 16 VF 16 47 46 16 + 7 ic a 17 Az 47 16 16 i 7 4 2 iis is : 16 : 16 AS . 47 1 7 17 47 1% a7 " 6 A P 16 47 1 7 47 46 1 7 16 Gt in ty of - G a n v i c t i o n Lo s A n g e l e s K e r n S t a n i s l a u s L e s A n g e l e s Lo s An ge le s L o s A n g e l e s F r e s n o F r e s n e Lo s A n g e l e s Lo s. A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s R i v e r s i d e S a c r a m e n t o Lo s. A n g e l e s t o s A n g e l e s S e l a n a Lo g. An ge le s S a c r a m e n t o Sa n Fr an ci sc a Lo s: A n g e l e s Sa n Be rn ar di no Lo s. An ge le s S a c r a m e n t s L o g A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s fi ve rs di ge Fr es no t a s A r i g e i e s _L es . A n g e t e s Lo s. A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s S a n B e r o a r d i a o S a n B i e g o Lo s A n g e l e s S e q B e r n a r i i n g L o s A n g e l e s . D e p a r t m e n t . o f C o r r e c t i o n s a n d R e h a t i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a s O e c t a b e r 2 0 1 5 I n s t i t u t i o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Sa li na s: V a l l e y S t a t e Pr is or i T r o n w o d d S t a t e P r i s o n K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s a n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S a c r a m e n t o Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Co rc or an G a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , Lo s. A n g e l e s C o u n t y M u l e C r e e k S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , C o r c o r a n Ca li pa tr ia St at e Pr is on G e n t i n e l a S t a t e P r i s o n I r o n k o o d S t a t e P r i s e n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S o l a n o G a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S a c r a m e n t o M u l e Cr ee k. S t a t e P r i s o n P e l i c a n B a y S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S o l a n o H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n P a l i c a n S a y S t a t e P r i s o n Pe li ca n. B a y ‘S ta te P r i s o n No rt h Ke rn St at e Pr is on H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s d n Ka rn Va ll ey St at e Pr is on ca li fo rn ia . St at e Pr is en , Lo s. An ge le s. Co un ty K e r n Va ll ey S t a t e Pr is on “H ig h De se rt St at e Pr is on Sa li na s Va ll ey St at e P r i s o n Ke rn . V a l l e y S t a t e Pr is on : Pl ea sa nt Va ll ey St at e Pr is on Ga li fo rn ia , S t a t e P r i s o n , Lo s A n g e l e s C o u n t y K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n : Ca li fo rn ia S t a t e Pr is on , L o s An ge le s Co un ty Ca li fo rn ia Su bs ta nc e. Ab us e Tr ea tm en t: Fa ci li ty T r o n w o o d S t a t e P r i s o n ca li fe rd ia St at e Pr ig an , Sa er as en to H i g h . D e s e r t St at e. P r i s o n T h e s e d a t a v a l u e s ma y d i f f e r f r a m t h o s d p r e v i o u s l y p u b l i s h e d d u e t o d a t a b a s e u p d a t e s , RE FE RE NC E: W: \O TS B\ DA UL SA S\ OA UO E\ Ad H o o 20 75 -1 0\ un de rl a L W O P S ~ "R ev UC OU TP UT : W: \O IS B\ OA U\ Pr oj ec ts \D AU DG \ A d H oe \ 20 18 -1 0 \ Un de r 18 -L WO PS wi th Se nt en ce Oa te 0 0 0 0 0 5 D a t a A n a l y s i s U n i t E s t i m a t e s a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e c t i o n O f t e n d e r I n f o r m a t i o n S e r v i c é s B r a n c h N a e BR AS H, LO UI E U S G R T O , F R A N K HA RK IN S, TR AV IS GA UL EG OS ;, AS HL EY BE RG , JA SO N WA LL AC E, uI LE S SA NC HE Z, EO WA RD VI KT OR , JA RR ED SA LI NA S, J O E L JO NE S, ER IK MO RA LE S, RO BE RT TZ UL , DA MI AN CO TT LE , “L AW RE NC E DR EB ER T, MI CH AE L CA MA RE NA , ER IC LO PE Z, FE RN AN DO SH AH EE D, HA NE EF R A M A Z Z I N I , N A T H A N HA RR IN G, DA VI G J O S H U A , E G R A C T O RO DR IG UE Z, RO MA N YS LA S, MI CH AE L WI NG , SA MO NT SE CR EA SE , SH AN HO N LO PE Z, RI CA RD G LE OP OL D, CA RL NE VA RE Z, AN DR EW JI ME NE Z, RA YM ON D RU IZ , ED GA AR DO AY AL A, RO Y MG DU RF Y, MA JU BA DR EV ER , HE NR Y WA IT LO W, DA NT EL TO SC AN O, JU AN FA LE NG IA , BE NJ AM IN SA LA ZA R, HA GD AL EN O o f f e n s e S e t e OS /1 8/ 19 95 49 72 47 19 95 oa y2 7/ 19 94 oa sa 7r ig sa 05 /2 3/ 19 96 41 71 87 19 94 01 /2 4/ 19 94 ag /2 3/ 19 95 TL ET T A S S 09 /1 2/ 18 96 06 /3 0/ 19 98 ar /2 7/ 19 92 1 t a s 1 a s 6 42 70 9/ 19 95 06 /2 9/ 19 96 so c1 1p 19 94 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 9 9 4 O T { 1 5 / 13 87 A T P E / 19 07 06 /2 8/ 19 97 40 /0 6/ 15 96 . f0 /0 6/ 19 96 . 0 9 ) 8a fi ee 7 * 6 9 / 1 5 / 1 9 9 6 04 /1 27 19 96 42 70 17 19 06 : O7 (2 3/ 19 97 07 /2 3/ 19 97 0 7 / 2 9 / 1 9 9 5 07 /2 6/ 19 97 06 /1 7 11 99 5 01 /2 0/ 79 98 01 /2 9/ 45 98 Oe y ti fi 19 se 11 72 97 19 97 at sn ef ie et Sé nt ie nc e Be gi n Da te O8 f1 77 19 97 04 /3 0/ 19 97 04 72 57 19 97 04 /2 5/ 19 97 c7 o a /1 99 07 oB yo 4/ 19 97 08 /2 6/ 19 97 VW /1 7/ 19 97 98 /1 6/ 19 99 0 2 / 0 6 7 1 9 9 8 11 /0 6/ 20 08 g3 y1 17 19 98 : 03 /1 2/ 19 98 03 /1 9/ 19 98 0 4 / 0 8 / 1 9 9 8 4 1 6 7 1 9 9 8 OT (0 2/ 19 98 OF se ay ig e8 0 8 / 0 7 / 1 9 9 8 0 8 / 1 3 / 1 9 9 8 09 /0 4/ 19 96 0 9 / 0 4 / 3 9 9 8 - 0 9 / 0 2 / 1 5 9 8 9 9 / 2 4 / 1 9 9 8 1 0 / 0 7 / 1 9 9 8 1 0 7 1 9 7 1 9 9 8 ii po 2s ig es 11 70 27 19 98 12 72 37 19 98 0 1 / 0 8 / 1 9 9 9 OI so s s1 98 99 08 /2 5/ 15 98 02 /4 3 72 00 8 03 /2 0/ 19 08 : 0 3 / 2 5 / 1 9 9 8 03 /2 2/ 15 99 Ag e at O f f e n s e 16 17 16 17 17 17 6 16 17 17 17 16 1 6 1? WF +6 16 16 7 1 7 7 % 7 7 iF {7 17 {7 17 7 17 16 17 i? 17 1 7 17 C o u n t y o f Go nv ic ti on L o s A n g e l e s S a c r a m e n t d R i v e r s i d e R i v e r s i d e Sa n. D i e g e S a c r a m e n t o S a c r a m e n t o Sa n Di eg o Lo s An ge le s L o s A n g e l e s L o s . A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s Lo s An ge le s Lo s An ga lé s Lo s. A n g e l e s Sa n Di eg o C o l d s a K e r n S a n J o a q u i n O r a n g e ” “O ra ng e Lo s An ge le s S o l a n o L o s A n g e l e s A l a m e d a Ki ng s Ki ng s Sa nt a Cl ar a . S t a n i s l a u s L o s A n g e l e s S a n O i e g e S a n D i e g o Lo s. Af ig el es Lo s An ge le s L a s A n g e l e s B e p a r t h s n t . . o f c o r r e c t i o n s a n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n St at e of Ca li fo rn ia O c t o b e r 2 0 4 5 I n s t i t u t i o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s a n , L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y I r o n w o o d S t a t e P r i s o n P e l i c a n B a y S t a t e P r i s o n C e n t i n e l a S t a t e P r i s o n K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n Hi gh De se rt St at e Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S a c r a m e n t o S a l i n a s . V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s a n Ca li fo rn ia Co rr ec ti on al In st it ut io n M u l e C r e e x S t a t e P r i s o n S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n . P e l i c a n B a y St at e. .P ri so n H i g h D e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a C o r r e c t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n Ce nt in el a St at e Pr is on K a e w Va ll ey st at e. Pr is on T r o n w o o d S t a t e P r i s o n H i g h De se rt St at e Pi ri se n Ke rn Va ll ey : St at e Pr is an Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on ’, Co rc or an Ce nt in el a St at e P r i s o n Ry Do no va n Co rr ec ti on al Fa ci li ty C a l i t o c n i a S u b s t a n c e A b u s e T r e a t m e n t F a c i l i t y Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is én , So la no Sa li na s. V a l l e y St at e: P r i s o n ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , So la no . P l e a s n t Va ll ey S t a t e ‘P ri so n Sa li na s Va ll ey St at e: Pr ig an Pl ea sa nt Va ll ey S t a t e Pr is on Wu de ‘C re ek St at e. Pr is on Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Le s. An ge le s Co un ty Sa li na s, Va ll ey S t a t e Pr is on , C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , té s A n g é l e s T o u n t y Ca li pa tr ia ‘S ta te Pr is on _ Ke rn Va ll ey St at e. Pr is on Sa n Qu en ti n: St at e: Pr is an Th es e da ta va lu es wa y di ff er fr om th os e pr ev io us ly pu bl is he d du e to da ta ba se ‘u pd at es . RE FE RE NC E: W: \O IS B\ DA U\ SA S\ DA UD G \ Ad _ H o e (2 01 5- 40 \u nd er ’s LW OP S = Re y B G OU TP UT : W: \O IS B\ DA U\ Pr oj eo ts \D AU Q6 \A d_ Ho c\ 20 15 -1 0\ Un de r 18 LW OP S wi th Se nt en ce Da te 0 0 0 0 0 6 D a t a A n a l y s i s U n i t E s t i m a t e s a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e o t i o n O f f e n d e r In fo rm at io n. S e r v i c e s B r a n c h G e p a r t m e n t . o f C o r r e c t i o n s . a i d A e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a O c t o b e r 2 0 1 5 N a n e WI LL OV ER , NO RM AN NU TH - KI MO RA N MO NG CA DO , CH AT ST OP HE R RU EL AS , AN GE L BR AZ IL E, BR IA N PA DI LL A, MA RT O RA IN EY , CL YD E NC GI NN IS , RA YM ON D TH OM PS ON , .S ER TR AN D CH AV EZ , MA RC OS BA RR OS O, OE NN IS G U Z M A N , J A I M E C A S T I L L E , C L E M E T H SH IE LO S, AA YO N JO HN SO N, MA RC US B R A C A H O N T E S , C H R I S T I A N “P IM EN TE L, FR AN CI SC O RO WE , “E UI UA R HE RN AN DE Z, TH OM AS BA RN ES , RO MA N WA TS ON ). -K HA RY SA NN S: ,. . A L E X A N D E R VA ED EZ , MA RT AN O JO HN ST ON , JA SO N SH YD ER , LE E RO GE RS , TO NY AR AN DA , AL FO NS O HA YG OO D, “O DE N ZA VA LA , JO SE H A R P E R , J A R R E T T JO HN SO N, “T AR AY R O S I N S O N , T R A V O K . CA RR OL L, MA UR IC E GA IN ES .. . J O E GO ME Z, “R IC AR NO CE RN AS , Hi iG O O f f e n s e D a t e O4 .7 94 ./ 79 06 8 D S 7 O H T ( 1 8 9 s 07 /2 8/ 19 95 09 7 19 /1 99 7 6 7 / 2 2 / 1 9 9 7 01 /t sy to 98 1 0 7 3 1 / 1 9 9 6 03 /0 4/ 19 98 7 / 1 2 / 2 9 9 5 11 /2 3/ 19 97 o9 78 0/ 19 58 W1 /2 3/ 19 97 11 7 11 /1 99 6 4 1 / 1 1 7 1 9 9 6 06 /1 2/ 19 87 05 /0 9/ 19 98 7 7 2 1 / 4 9 9 9 04 /2 27 19 99 o2 /; 21 / 19 99 61 /0 5/ 19 99 10 /0 7 / 1 99 4 04 /0 2/ 19 97 ¥1 /{ O4 /7 99 8 0 2 / 1 9 / 1 9 9 9 03 /2 4/ 19 98 64 /2 0/ 19 96 08 /2 0/ 19 98 12 /0 7/ 19 99 06 /0 8/ 79 99 b i y o a / 2 0 0 0 O7 /2 7 V a s s 64 7 14 /2 00 6 es /i 1p /2 00 0 G 7 /2 1 7/ 20 04 0 2 / 0 2 / 2 0 0 4 70 /0 5/ 20 04 Se nt en ce : Be gi n: D a t e 04 /1 9/ 19 99 0 4 / 2 5 / 1 9 8 9 65 /4 9/ 19 99 07 /1 5/ 20 13 07 /2 9/ 49 99 06 /0 2/ 49 99 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 9 9 9 08 /1 6/ 19 99 12 12 97 49 99 09 /1 6/ 19 89 oa f2 i/ 19 99 {O 07 14 /1 99 9 01 /0 3/ 20 00 O1 /0 8/ 20 00 10 /1 9/ 20 00 02 /1 8/ 20 09 oa pi 7 72 00 0 05 /1 8/ 20 00 07 7. 41 5/ 20 00 0 9 / 2 8 / 2 0 0 0 4 2 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 9 0 2 / 0 6 / 2 0 0 1 o 2 y u y 2 u 0 1 0 2 / 0 9 / 2 0 0 1 0 3 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 4 03 /2 9/ 20 01 0 4 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 1 0 5 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 1 0 5 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 1 0 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 1 6 8 / 2 7 / 2 0 0 1 0 2 / 2 0 / 2 0 0 2 0 4 / 4 7 / 2 0 0 2 0 7 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 2 0 8 / 0 8 / 2 0 0 2 0 4 7 2 7 ( 2 0 0 5 A g e a t O f f e n s e 17 46 47 V7 1 6 1 6 16 41 6° 17 17 16 16 1 7 17 48 . 4 6 47 4% : A ? 4 6 + e 6 17 47 47 17 7 1é 17 4? V7 47 1z i? 7 47 C o u n t y o F G a n v i c t i o d M o n t e re y Lo s: A n g é l e s L o s A n g e l e s M a n t e r a y Sa n. B e r n a r d i n s Lo s “A ng el es G a n t r a C o s t a t o s A n g e l e s Sa n. J o a q u i n ‘T ul ar e ‘L os : An ge le s T u l a r e A l a m e d a Al am ed a Lo s An ge le s R i v e r s i d e Ke ra S a n D i e g o ‘ S a c r a m e n t o . Sa d: B e r n a d i n e “S an . Di eg o “ p a n B e r n a t a i n g Ri ve rs id e Ri ve rs id e Co nt ra Co st a Sa n. B e r n a r d i n o ‘L os . An ge le s Sa n Di eg o ‘L os : An ge le s La s An ge le s Lo s A n g e l e s to s, A n g e l e s Lo s: An ge le s Lo s An ge le s L o s . A n g e l e s : F r e s n o I n s t i t u t i o n N o r t h K e r n S t a t e P r i s o n C e n t i n e l a S t a t e P r i s o n G a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , S a c r a m e n t o P l e a s a n t V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s e n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , C o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Wa sc o: S t a t e P r i s o n N o r t h K e r n S t a t e P r i s o n Ge nt in ie la . S t a t e P r i s o n lr on we oa d S t a t e P r i s o n Pe li ca n Ba y St at e Pr is on P e l i c a n Ba y. S t a t e P r i s o n S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s e n , S o l a n e D e v e l V o c a t i o n a l i n s t i t u t i o n Ca li fo rn ia St at e P r i s o n , Co rc or an Hi gh Oe se rt ‘S ta te : Pe is on Ke fn Va ll ey St at e Pr is on K e r n V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Sa cr am en to C e n t i n e l s S t a t e P r i s o n Rd Do no va n Co rr ec ti on al Fa ci li ty Ce nt in el a St at e Pr is en Ca li fo rn ia , St at e Pr is on , Co rc or an Ge nt in el a St at e Pr is on H i g h O e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , Lo s. A n g e l e s C o u n t y- Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Lo s An ge le s Ca un ty il D o n o v a n C o r r e c t i o n a l F a c i l i t y Ga li pa tr ia St at e Pr is on . C a l i f o r n i a St at e. P r i s o n , Lo s. A n g e l e a C o u n t y Ca li pa tr ia St at e, Pr is an I r o n w o o d S t a t e . P r i s o n T r o n v o o d S t a t e P r i s c n S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n iL ro nw oe d S t a t e P r i s o n S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P e i s a n T h e s e d a t a v a l u e s a a y d i f f e r t r o m t h o s e p r e v i o u s l y p u b l i s h e d d u e t o d a t a b a s e u p d a t e s . RE FE RE NC E; Wt \O LS BY DA U\ SA S\ DA U0 S\ Ad _H oc \2 01 8- 1O \u nd er 18 L W O P S ~ Re v D C OU TP UT : W: \O TB B\ DA U\ Pr oj ec ts \D AN OG \A d_ Ho c\ 20 15 -1 0\ Un de r 18 LW OP S wi th S e n t e n c e Da te 0 0 0 0 0 7 D a t a A n a l y s i e U n i t E s t i m a t e s . a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e c t i o n O f f e n d e r I n t o r m a t i o n S e r v i c e s B r a n c h N a m e HA RP ER , JA SO N Z A M O R A , A G U S T I N E HO DG SO N, WI LL IA M DO UG LA S, TY RO NE V A L D E Z , R A M O N RO BI NS ON , KE NY UN VO , NH UT MO TE , BR IA N N G U O N , T H A E L E E TZ AG UI RA E, JO HN NY RA MI RE Z, RA YM ON D BA RR ON . TO NY GO LD SB ER RY , RO BE RT NA RA NU O, MI CH AE L CO PE LA ND , AN DR E JO HN SO N, AN TW ON E BA RR AG AN , DA NI EL HU SS ON ; DE ON OR E ZH UK , DA NI IL MO NT ES , LO UT S SA RA BI A, AD AM AR EN AS , VA LE NT IN O C A M P O S , R A U L PO NC E, ” JU LI O OA NE LA S, JU AN BE LL , TE RR Y AN DR AD E, OS CA R MO NT ER OS , FR AN CI SC O H O W A R D , R E G I N A L D SE RV IN , RA FA EL LO ZA NO , EL IZ AB ET H BR OW N, GI ND Y CO RD OV A, DA YA NA NA VA RR A, BR IT TA NY DE MO LA , NA TA LT E P R E A S M Y E R , A M Y 0 0 0 0 0 8 O f f e n s e D a t e 1 1 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 4 07 7- 24 ( 2 0 0 0 1 2 / 1 2 / 2 6 0 0 08 71 9/ 20 00 . 0 4 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 4 © 10 /1 8/ 18 82 0 5 / 3 1 / 1 9 9 7 12 /1 9/ 19 97 O4 1 /2 67 20 01 06 /0 1/ 20 02 08 /2 0/ 20 02 07 20 5 (2 00 8 o8 /3 1 72 00 2 0 7 / 2 1 / 2 6 0 0 os /o ts 20 02 a 7 ta f2 o0 2 0 1 7 4 7 7 2 6 0 8 04 /7 2/ 20 03 Q1 /2 07 20 00 04 /0 0/ 20 04 10 /2 4 fa on e 04 72 77 20 04 O1 7 19 {2 00 2 08 /3 0/ 20 02 1 o s s / i s s e 04 /4 0/ 20 01 62 /2 7/ 20 04 14 /1 4/ 20 01 17 /0 37 19 98 - 0 3 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 8 o1 yR es i9 e2 4 2 / 0 2 / 7 9 9 9 10 /4 8/ 20 07 01 /1 4/ 20 08 04 /1 0/ 20 01 08 /1 2/ 19 97 " S e n t e n c e Be gi n: Da te 44 /0 8/ 20 02 1 1 / 2 0 / 2 0 0 2 ot fo ry a0 09 03 /2 6/ 20 03 03 /2 7/ 20 08 5 / 2 1 7 2 0 0 3 06 /2 0/ 20 03 06 /2 7/ 20 08 07 /1 5/ 20 03 99 70 97 20 03 o9 72 84 20 03 gg /1 6/ 20 04 41 /0 8 72 00 3 1 4 4 4 / 2 0 0 3 O p e s j o n u g g fe o0 4 os /o iy 20 04 6/ 28 /2 00 4 07 /2 1. (2 00 4 G a s /2 00 4 09 /2 9/ 20 04 03 /7 7/ 20 05 o3 jo 2/ 20 08 02 /2 3/ 20 05 07 /2 2/ 20 05 08 /0 2/ 20 05 9 8 / 1 9 7 2 0 0 5 09 /2 6/ 20 05 1 0 7 0 5 / 2 0 0 5 40 /1 4/ 20 08 T O I T E1 99 6 a2 /1 a/ 19 97 42 /2 0/ 20 09 63 /0 5/ 20 15 ba fo 3s 20 05 04 /0 4/ 20 08 Ag e at O f f e n s e 1 6 17 16 17 17 16 16 16 16 8 1 6 17 16 . 17 17 17 16 17 1 7 7 16 16 7 16 16 7 17 q7 . W w 16 16 17 16 16 16 16 C o u n t y o f C o n v i c t i o n R i v e r s i d e La s A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s . Lo s: A n g e l e s Lo s A n g e l e s t a s A n g e l e s Qr an ge O r a n g e L a s A n g g i e s L o s A n g e l e s L o s A n g e l e s Lo s A n g e l e s S a n J o a q u i n L a s A n g e l e s Lo s. An ge le s Lo s: A n g e l e s La s: A n g e l e s S a c r a n e n t o S a c r a m e n t s S a n - B e r n a r d i n a V e n t u r a L o s A n g e l e s S a n M a t e r Or an ge Ke rn : R i v e r s i d e O r a n g e A l a n e d a La s A n g e l e s Or an ge ” bo s. A n g e l e s ‘ b o s A n g e l e s R i v e r s i d e W a d e r a Ri ve rs id e (L as An ge le s D e p a r t m e n t a f C o r r e c t i a a s an d: R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f G a l i f a r n i a O c t o b e r 2 0 1 5 . I n s t i t u t i o n : Ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Co rc or an ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Lo s An ge le s: Co un ty C a l i f o r n i a S u b s t a n c e A b u s e T r e a t m e n t F a c b l i t y S a l i f o r n i a C o r r e c t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n Ga nt in ei a ‘S ta te Pr is an Sa li pa tr ia St at e: Pr is on S a l i n a s V a l l e y S t a t e P r i s o n . Ca li fo rn ia H e a l t h Ga re Fa ci li ty - St oc kt on Pl ea sa nt . Va ll ey St at e P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P r i s o n , C o r c o r a n ca li fo rn ia St at e Pr is on , Sa cr am en to H i g h N e s e r t S t a t e P r i s o n K e r n Va ll ey : S t a t e P r i s o n ’ M u l e Cr ee k: St at e. P r i s o n C a l i f o r n i a St at e: P r i s o r , L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Ca li fo rn ia . Su bs ta nc e A b u s e Tr ea tm en t Fa ci li ty Ke rn Va ll ey St at e Pr is on Ga li fo rn ia St at e. Pr is on , So la no De ve l Vo ca ti on al In st it ut io n ‘K er n Va ll ey St at eP ri so n Ke rn Va ll ey : St at e Pr is on K e r n Va ll ey : S t a t e P r i s o n Pe li ca n. Ba y S t a t e Pr is ca Ca li fo rn ia Su bs ta nc e: Ab li se Tr ea ta en t Fa ci li ty Sa li na s Va ll ey ‘S ta te Pr is on C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e - P r i s o n ; L o s An ge le s. C o u n t y Se nt in el a St at e Pr is on Ke rn V a i l e y St at e P r i s o n v e n t i n e l a S t a t e P r i s o n K a r n V a l l e y . S t a t e P r i s o n C e n t r a l C a l i f o r a i a W o m e n ’ s f a c i l i t y Ge nt ra l. C a l i f o r n i a W o m e n ’ s F a c i l i t y S e n t r a l C a l i f o r n i a W o m e n ’ s F a c i l i t y C e n t r a l C a l i f o r n i a W o m e n ' s F a c i l i t y CG én té al C a l i f o r n i a Wo ne n' 's F a c i l i t y ce nt ra l Ga li fo rn ia Wo me n' s Fa ci li ty Th es e da ta -v al ue s ma y di tt er tr om th os e pr ev io us ly pu bl is he d du e to da ta ba se up da te s. AE PE RE NC E: . W: \O 1S B\ DA U\ SA S\ DA UO G\ Ad : Ho c \2 01 5- 10 \u nd er ?& LW OP S - Re s OU TP UT : WW: \O IS B\ DA U\ Pr oj ec ts \O AU OS \A d_ Ho o\ 20 15 -1 0\ Un de r 18 LW OP S wi th Se nt en ce Da te D a t a A n a l y s i s U n i t E s t i m a t e s a n d S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s S e c t i o n O f f e n d e r I n f a r w a t i o n S e r v i c e s B r a n c h O f f e n s e H a n e D a t e S e n t e n c e B e g i n D a t e H A N S E N , B R A E 0 6 7 1 9 / 2 0 0 7 0 7 / 0 6 / 2 0 0 0 Ag e at O f f e n s e 17 . C a u n t y . o f Co nv ic ti on S a n G i e g a f e p a r t m e n t o f C a r r e c t i o n s a n d A e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a Oc to be r. 2 0 1 5 I n s t i t u t i o n Ce nt ra l Ca li fo rn ia Wo me n' s Fa ci li ty Th es e da ta va lu es ma y di ff er fr om th os e pr ev io us ly pu bl is he d du e to da ta ba se up da te s. RE FE RE NC ES : W: \O 1S B\ DA U\ SA S \D AU OG \A d :H ob \2 01 5- 10 4 U ra e LW OP S - Re v ot GU TP UT : W: \G IS B\ DA U\ Pr oj ec ts \D AU 0S \A dH oc 20 45 -1 0\ Un de r 48 LW OP S wi th Se nt en ce Da te oo oo 0g
