§Why CasetextPricing

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON v. J-M MANUFACTURING

Amicus Curiae Brief of Amici Legal Scholars

4 Cited authorities

  1. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC

    927 F. Supp. 2d 390 (N.D. Tex. 2013)   Cited 18 times
    Distinguishing Celgene, 2008 WL 2937415, at *8

  2. Sheppard v. J-M Mfg. Co.

    244 Cal.App.4th 590 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 7 times   2 Legal Analyses

    B256314 01-29-2016 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. J–M MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Defendant and Appellant. Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Kent L. Richardson, Barbara W. Ravitz, and Jeffrey E. Raskin, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Kevin S. Rosen, Theane Evangelis, and Heather L. Richardson, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent. COLLINS, J. Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Kent L. Richardson, Barbara W. Ravitz, and

  3. Section 6068 - Duties of attorney

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068   Cited 913 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Requiring attorney "[t]o maintain inviolate the confidence, and at every peril to himself or herself to preserve the secrets, of his or her client"

  4. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,153 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or