§Why CasetextPricing

KIM v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION

Respondents’ Additional Authorities Letter

3 Cited authorities

  1. Mazda Motor Corp. v. Hurst

    261 So. 3d 167 (Ala. 2017)   Cited 9 times
    Discussing the proof required to support a claim of wantonness

  2. Holiday Motor Corp. v. Walters

    292 Va. 461 (Va. 2016)   Cited 9 times
    In Holiday Motor, the Supreme Court of Virginia held that the plaintiffs' expert witness failed to identify an applicable industry standard relating to the design of a "soft top latching system" to protect occupants of convertible automobiles "during [a] rollover crash."

  3. Pacy v. Cowen Holdings, Inc.

    148 A.D.3d 1747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

    256 CA 16-00835. 03-31-2017 David J. PACY, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Kimberly M. Pacy, an Infant, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. COWEN HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants, Raytheon Commercial Laundry LLC, Individually and doing business as Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and as Successor in Interest to Raytheon Company, Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, formerly known as Raytheon Commercial Laundry LLC, and Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Defendants–Respondents. Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria