§Why CasetextPricing

BROWN v. S.C. (CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION)

Petitioners Reply to Return of Real Parties in Interest

8 Cited authorities

  1. Manduley v. Superior Court of San Diego County

    27 Cal.4th 537 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 314 times
    Upholding Proposition 21

  2. Raven v. Deukmejian

    52 Cal.3d 336 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 227 times
    Upholding Crime Victims Justice Reform Act (Proposition 115)

  3. Brosnahan v. Brown

    32 Cal.3d 236 (Cal. 1982)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that Proposition 8 did not violate the single-subject rule even where it sought to amend the Constitution, Penal Code, and Welfare and Institutions Code

  4. Fair Political Practices Com. v. Superior Court

    25 Cal.3d 33 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that a complete ban on all contributions by lobbyists was not closely drawn under Buckley

  5. Yes on 25, Citizens for an On-Time Budget v. Superior Court (Edmund G. Brown)

    189 Cal.App.4th 1445 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. C065707, C065708. August 9, 2010. Appeal from the Superior Court of Sacramento County, No. 34201080000610, Patrick Marlette, Judge. Remcho, Johansen Purcell, Robin B. Johansen; Olson, Hagel, Fishburn and Lance H. Olson for Petitioner Yes on 25, Citizens for an On-Time Budget. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, and Anthony O'Brien, Deputy Attorney General, for Petitioner Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in C065708. No appearance for Respondent. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, and Anthony O'Brien

  6. Franchise Tax Board v. Cory

    80 Cal.App.3d 772 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 43 times
    In Franchise Tax Bd.v. Cory, supra, 80 Cal.App.3d 772, the court held that legislation effected an amendment of existing law where its “‘aim [was] to clarify or correct uncertainties which arose from the enforcement of the existing law....’” (Id. at p. 777.)

  7. Section 9034 - Certification upon collection of 25 percent of number of signatures needed to qualify initiative measure for ballot

    Cal. Elec. Code § 9034   Cited 4 times

    (a) The proponents of a proposed initiative measure shall submit a certification, signed under penalty of perjury, to the Secretary of State immediately upon the collection of 25 percent of the number of signatures needed to qualify the initiative measure for the ballot. (b) Upon the receipt of the certification required by subdivision (a), the Secretary of State shall transmit copies of the initiative measure, together with the circulating title and summary as prepared by the Attorney General pursuant

  8. Rule 8.487 - Opposition and amicus curiae briefs

    Cal. R. 8.487   Cited 29 times

    (a) Preliminary opposition (1) Within 10 days after the petition is filed, the respondent or any real party in interest, separately or jointly, may serve and file a preliminary opposition. (2) A preliminary opposition must contain a memorandum and a statement of any material fact not included in the petition. (3) Within 10 days after a preliminary opposition is filed, the petitioner may serve and file a reply. (4) Without requesting preliminary opposition or waiting for a reply, the court may grant