93 Cited authorities

Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court
57 Cal.2d 450 (Cal. 1962) Cited 5,915 times 8 Legal Analyses
Explaining the "rule requiring a court exercising inferior jurisdiction to follow the decisions of a court exercising a higher jurisdiction"
Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy)
46 Cal.4th 969 (Cal. 2009) Cited 580 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that proof of a Labor Code violation is a prerequisite to recovery of PAGA penalties
Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.
19 Cal.4th 26 (Cal. 1998) Cited 754 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"
Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State University
132 Cal.App.4th 359 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) Cited 513 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that failure to consider that payment for the case was deferred for four years in discussion of whether a multiplier was warranted was an abuse of discretion
People ex Rel. Gallo v. Acuna
14 Cal.4th 1090 (Cal. 1997) Cited 515 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that preliminary injunctions are reviewed "under an abuse of discretion standard"
Nally v. Grace Community Church
47 Cal.3d 278 (Cal. 1988) Cited 509 times
Holding that nontherapist counselors did not have a duty to prevent the suicide of a person who was not in their custody
Doe v. City of Los Angeles
42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007) Cited 257 times
Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."
People ex Rel. Lungren v. Superior Court
14 Cal.4th 294 (Cal. 1996) Cited 317 times
Holding that, consistent with the broad protection for drinking water before it comes out of the tap, a defective plumbing fixture was a "source of drinking water."
San Diego Gas Electric Co. v. Superior Court
13 Cal.4th 893 (Cal. 1996) Cited 294 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a negligence claim would be barred by Section 1759 because "an award of damages on that theory would plainly undermine the commission's policy by holding the utility liable for not doing what the commission has repeatedly determined that it and all similarly situated utilities were not required to do."
Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.
23 Cal.4th 116 (Cal. 2000) Cited 230 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiff may seek "injunctive relief against unfair or unlawful practices in order to protect the public"
Section 1531 - Congressional findings and declaration of purposes and policy
16 U.S.C. § 1531 Cited 1,672 times 26 Legal Analyses
Finding and declaring that "various species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the United States have been rendered extinct" while "other species ... have been so depleted in numbers that they are in danger of or threatened with extinction ...."
Section 21001 - Policy of state as to quality of environment
Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21001 Cited 156 times
The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to: (a) Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state. (b) Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise. (c) Prevent the elimination of
Section 4202 - Findings
16 U.S.C. § 4202 Cited 3 times
The Congress finds the following: (1) Elephant populations in Africa have declined at an alarming rate since the mid-1970's. (2) The large illegal trade in African elephant ivory is the major cause of this decline and threatens the continued existence of the African elephant. (3) The African elephant is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its continued existence will be further jeopardized if this decline is not reversed. (4) Because African
Section 3.128 - Space requirements
9 C.F.R. § 3.128 Cited 6 times
Enclosures shall be constructed and maintained so as to provide sufficient space to allow each animal to make normal postural and social adjustments with adequate freedom of movement. Inadequate space may be indicated by evidence of malnutrition, poor condition, debility, stress, or abnormal behavior patterns. 9 C.F.R. § 3.128
Section 3.140 - Care in transit
9 C.F.R. § 3.140 Cited 2 times
(a) During surface transportation, it shall be the responsibility of the driver or other employee to visually observe the live animals as frequently as circumstances may dictate, but not less than once every 4 hours, to assure that they are receiving sufficient air for normal breathing, their ambient temperatures are within the prescribed limits, all other applicable standards are being complied with and to determine whether any of the live animals are in obvious physical distress and to provide
Section 671.3 - Minimum Facility and Caging Standards for Wild Animals Housed at Permanent Facilities
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 671.3
(a) General Housing Requirements and Specifications. (1) All cages or enclosures shall be completely enclosed unless otherwise specified. (2) Compatible animals may be held in the same enclosure if the required floor space is provided. (3) Common walls between noncompatible animals shall be constructed so that animals cannot gain access to each other. (4) If the ambient air temperature falls below that necessary to maintain the animal in a healthy condition, an artificial heat source that is sufficient
Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply
Cal. R. 8.504 Cited 21 times
(a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)

LEIDER v. LEWIS

93 Cited authorities

Explaining the "rule requiring a court exercising inferior jurisdiction to follow the decisions of a court exercising a higher jurisdiction"

Holding that proof of a Labor Code violation is a prerequisite to recovery of PAGA penalties

Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"

Holding that failure to consider that payment for the case was deferred for four years in discussion of whether a multiplier was warranted was an abuse of discretion

Holding that preliminary injunctions are reviewed "under an abuse of discretion standard"

Holding that nontherapist counselors did not have a duty to prevent the suicide of a person who was not in their custody

Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."

Holding that, consistent with the broad protection for drinking water before it comes out of the tap, a defective plumbing fixture was a "source of drinking water."

Holding plaintiff may seek "injunctive relief against unfair or unlawful practices in order to protect the public"

Finding and declaring that "various species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the United States have been rendered extinct" while "other species ... have been so depleted in numbers that they are in danger of or threatened with extinction ...."