§Why CasetextPricing

R. (K.) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)

Real Party in Interest, The People, Answer Brief on the Merits

24 Cited authorities

  1. Santobello v. New York

    404 U.S. 257 (1971)   Cited 4,866 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if petitioner is granted specific performance he "should be resentenced by a different judge"

  2. People v. Shelton

    37 Cal.4th 759 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 684 times
    Contracting parties' intent can be determined by circumstances under which parties entered into or negotiated the contract and the parties' subsequent conduct

  3. People v. Walker

    54 Cal.3d 1013 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 680 times
    In People v. Walker, 54 Cal.3d 1013, 1027, 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 902, 819 P.2d 861 (1991), overruled on other grounds by People v. Villalobos, 54 Cal.4th 177, 182–83, 141 Cal.Rptr.3d 491, 277 P.3d 179 (2012), the trial court ordered defendant to pay a fine even though the plea agreement did not contemplate the imposition of a fine at sentencing.

  4. People v. Arbuckle

    22 Cal.3d 749 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 362 times
    Finding reversible error when trial judge accepts plea bargain but fails to impose the sentence

  5. Ben-Zvi v. Edmar Co.

    40 Cal.App.4th 468 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 89 times
    Holding that " term can only be implied upon grounds of obvious necessity" (alteration added; other alterations adopted; citations and quotation marks omitted)

  6. People v. Martinez

    127 Cal.App.4th 1156 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 31 times

    No. B170558 March 28, 2005 Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Nos. PA040566 and PA042338, Darlene E. Schempp, Judge. Diana M. Teran, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Joseph P. Lee and Marc J. Nolan, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION RUBIN, J. Salvador Martinez appeals from the judgment

  7. In re Mark L.

    34 Cal.3d 171 (Cal. 1983)   Cited 62 times

    Docket No. Crim. 22845. July 28, 1983. COUNSEL Friedman, Sloan Ross, Stanley J. Friedman, Paul G. Sloan and Lawrence A. Gibbs for Petitioner. George Deukmejian and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, William D. Stein, Assistant Attorney General, Gloria F. DeHart, Kristofer Jorstad and Mary A. Roth, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. OPINION GRODIN, J. In juvenile court, Mark L., a minor, entered a no contest (Cal. Rules of Court

  8. Levi Strauss Co. v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

    184 Cal.App.3d 1479 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 44 times
    Construing contract on summary judgment where contract was silent on relevant term and party opposing motion argued the contract was ambiguous with respect to relevant term

  9. People v. Serrato

    201 Cal.App.3d 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 37 times
    Referring to identical language in former rule 416(e)

  10. People v. McIntosh

    177 Cal.App.4th 534 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 9 times
    Concluding that when, for reasons beyond the court's or the prosecutor's control, the judge who accepted the plea becomes unavailable, there is no automatic right for the defendant to withdraw his or her plea unless the evidence demonstrates that the identity of the sentencing judge was a material element in the defendant's decision to plead guilty