§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. FARWELL

Amicus Curiae Brief of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

24 Cited authorities

  1. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 23,494 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"

  2. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 12,560 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's right to self-representation was denied when he made his requests "weeks before trial" without any indication that the defendant was required to reassert his request during the trial

  3. Boykin v. Alabama

    395 U.S. 238 (1969)   Cited 13,233 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here

  4. North Carolina v. Alford

    400 U.S. 25 (1970)   Cited 10,659 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an individual may "consent to the imposition of a prison sentence" despite maintaining that he is innocent of the charged crime

  5. Brady v. United States

    397 U.S. 742 (1970)   Cited 7,318 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant who pled guilty to federal kidnapping could not impugn the propriety of his plea under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on a later development striking down the death penalty for that offense

  6. United States v. Vonn

    535 U.S. 55 (2002)   Cited 1,581 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant who does not object to a Rule 11 error in the district court is subject to the Rule 52(b) plain-error standard on appeal, even though Rule 11 does not have a provision stating that plain error review applies to claims not brought to the district court's attention

  7. Parke v. Raley

    506 U.S. 20 (1992)   Cited 1,580 times
    Holding "presumption of regularity that attaches to final judgments makes it appropriate" for defendant to have burden of showing irregularity of prior plea

  8. McCarthy v. United States

    394 U.S. 459 (1969)   Cited 3,371 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, if a plea is not "voluntary and knowing, it has been obtained in violation of due process and is therefore void"

  9. Johnson v. Zerbst

    304 U.S. 458 (1938)   Cited 8,802 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing and intelligent

  10. People v. Howard

    1 Cal.4th 1132 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 975 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant failed to show systematic exclusion to establish a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement under Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 358–367, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579

  11. Section 3553 - Imposition of a sentence

    18 U.S.C. § 3553   Cited 76,282 times   111 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court must consider whether its decision will "protect the public from further crimes of the defendant"

  12. Section 13

    Cal. Const. art. VI § 13   Cited 4,516 times
    Requiring a "miscarriage of justice"

  13. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or