61 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 159,542 times   179 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
  2. Padilla v. Kentucky

    559 U.S. 356 (2010)   Cited 8,670 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Holding that counsel has a duty under the Sixth Amendment to inform a noncitizen defendant that his plea would make him eligible for deportation
  3. Lafler v. Cooper

    566 U.S. 156 (2012)   Cited 4,788 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, was satisfied where, among other things, a defendant had rejected a favorable plea offer based on the unreasonable advice of counsel
  4. Hill v. Lockhart

    474 U.S. 52 (1985)   Cited 20,081 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but rejecting the claim at issue
  5. Missouri v. Frye

    566 U.S. 134 (2012)   Cited 3,826 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant can show prejudice under Strickland even absent a showing that the deficient performance precluded him from going to trial
  6. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 43,800 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence
  7. Holmes v. South Carolina

    547 U.S. 319 (2006)   Cited 1,910 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a rule that categorically barred evidence of third-party guilt when strong forensic evidence of the defendant's guilt was presented "is arbitrary in the sense that it does not rationally serve the end that ... [it was] designed to further"
  8. California v. Trombetta

    467 U.S. 479 (1984)   Cited 4,140 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Constitution does not require the state to preserve a breath sample used in a breath-analysis test in a DUI prosecution
  9. Crane v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 683 (1986)   Cited 3,293 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an opportunity to present a complete defense "would be an empty one if the State were permitted to exclude competent, reliable evidence bearing on the credibility of a confession when such evidence is central to the defendant's claim of innocence"
  10. Davis v. Alaska

    415 U.S. 308 (1974)   Cited 5,699 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this confrontation right is applicable to state and federal defendants alike
  11. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,329 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"
  12. Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2703   Cited 1,214 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"
  13. Section 2702 - Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2702   Cited 346 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Restricting use of Internet subscriber information without consent
  14. Section 1524 - Grounds for search warrant

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1524   Cited 135 times
    Noting that "[t]he property" listed in a search warrant "may be taken on the warrant from any place"
  15. Section 1523 - Search warrant

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1523   Cited 52 times

    A search warrant is an order in writing, in the name of the people, signed by a magistrate, directed to a peace officer, commanding him or her to search for a person or persons, a thing or things, or personal property, and, in the case of a thing or things or personal property, bring the same before the magistrate. Ca. Pen. Code § 1523 Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 1078, Sec. 1.5. Effective January 1, 1997.

  16. Section 5.45 - Procedure when testimony or production of documents is sought; general

    6 C.F.R. § 5.45   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a litigant to "set forth in writing, and with as much specificity as possible, the nature and relevance of the official information sought" from Department of Homeland Security witnesses