61 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 161,180 times   179 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ineffective assistance of counsel requires two showings: one, that "counsel's performance was deficient," and two, that "the deficient performance prejudiced the defense"
  2. Padilla v. Kentucky

    559 U.S. 356 (2010)   Cited 8,788 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Holding that counsel has a duty under the Sixth Amendment to inform a noncitizen defendant that his plea would make him eligible for deportation
  3. Lafler v. Cooper

    566 U.S. 156 (2012)   Cited 5,163 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, was satisfied where, among other things, a defendant had rejected a favorable plea offer based on the unreasonable advice of counsel
  4. Hill v. Lockhart

    474 U.S. 52 (1985)   Cited 20,278 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but rejecting the claim at issue
  5. Missouri v. Frye

    566 U.S. 134 (2012)   Cited 4,045 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant can show prejudice under Strickland even absent a showing that the deficient performance precluded him from going to trial
  6. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 44,596 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence
  7. Holmes v. South Carolina

    547 U.S. 319 (2006)   Cited 1,934 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a rule that categorically barred evidence of third-party guilt when strong forensic evidence of the defendant's guilt was presented "is arbitrary in the sense that it does not rationally serve the end that ... [it was] designed to further"
  8. California v. Trombetta

    467 U.S. 479 (1984)   Cited 4,171 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Constitution does not require the state to preserve a breath sample used in a breath-analysis test in a DUI prosecution
  9. Crane v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 683 (1986)   Cited 3,331 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant's "opportunity [to be heard] would be an empty one if the State were permitted to exclude competent, reliable evidence bearing on . . . the defendant's claim of innocence"
  10. Chambers v. Mississippi

    410 U.S. 284 (1973)   Cited 6,046 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the application of the rule against hearsay to exclude exculpatory testimony violated the defendant's right to present a complete defense because the testimony was reliable
  11. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,339 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"
  12. Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2703   Cited 1,229 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"
  13. Section 2702 - Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2702   Cited 351 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Restricting use of Internet subscriber information without consent
  14. Section 1524 - Grounds for search warrant

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1524   Cited 136 times
    Noting that "[t]he property" listed in a search warrant "may be taken on the warrant from any place"
  15. Section 1523 - Search warrant

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1523   Cited 52 times

    A search warrant is an order in writing, in the name of the people, signed by a magistrate, directed to a peace officer, commanding him or her to search for a person or persons, a thing or things, or personal property, and, in the case of a thing or things or personal property, bring the same before the magistrate. Ca. Pen. Code § 1523 Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 1078, Sec. 1.5. Effective January 1, 1997.

  16. Section 5.45 - Procedure when testimony or production of documents is sought; general

    6 C.F.R. § 5.45   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a litigant to "set forth in writing, and with as much specificity as possible, the nature and relevance of the official information sought" from Department of Homeland Security witnesses