§Why CasetextPricing

McMILLIN ALBANY v. S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief of Kasdan Lippsmith Weber Turner LLP

9 Cited authorities

  1. AAS v. SUPERIOR COURT

    24 Cal.4th 627 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 277 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Finding diminished value of residences containing hazardous defects not compensable

  2. Jimenez v. Superior Court

    29 Cal.4th 473 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 221 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the economic loss rule does not necessarily bar recovery in tort for damage that a defective product . . . causes to other portions of a larger product . . . into which the former has been incorporated"

  3. Verdugo v. Target Corp.

    59 Cal.4th 312 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that a retailer did not owe a common law duty to acquire and make available an AED to a patron

  4. Sacramento Regional Transit Dist. v. Grumman Flxible

    158 Cal.App.3d 289 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that strict liability in tort did not apply where claim alleged only economic loss because claim was governed by Uniform Commercial Code

  5. Burch v. Superior Court

    223 Cal.App.4th 1411 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 20 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Permitting homebuyer to sue general contractor for property damage caused by a construction defect

  6. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Brookfield Crystal Cove LLC

    219 Cal.App.4th 98 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 12 times   20 Legal Analyses
    In Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Brookfield Crystal Cove LLC (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 98 (Liberty Mutual), Hart purchased a new home built by Brookfield.

  7. Section 337.15 - Recovery of damages from person developing real property or performing or furnishing design, specifications, surveying, supervision testing, observation of construction

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 337.15   Cited 176 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing in pertinent part that: " No action may be brought to recover damages from any person, or the surety of a person, who develops real property or performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property more than 10 years after the substantial completion of the development or improvement for any of the following: Any latent deficiency in the design, specification, surveying, planning, supervision, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to, or survey of, real property[and/or] Injury to property, real or personal, arising out of any such latent deficiency."

  8. Section 337.1 - Recovery of damages against person performing design, specifications, surveying, planning, observation of construction

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 337.1   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no action shall be brought to recover damages from any person performing or furnishing the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property more than four years after the substantial completion of such improvement for any of the following: (1) Any patent deficiency in the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision or observation of construction

  9. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or