31 Cited authorities

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates

    455 U.S. 489 (1982)   Cited 2,870 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should consider constitutional challenge to statute as applied to plaintiff before considering other applications
  2. In re Sheena K

    40 Cal.4th 875 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 1,845 times
    Finding probationer's forfeiture properly disregarded where facially vague and overbroad probation condition could be corrected by inserting a knowledge requirement
  3. People v. Carbajal

    10 Cal.4th 1114 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 745 times
    Holding probationer convicted of hit-and-run could be ordered to pay vehicle damage not caused by criminal act of leaving scene of accident
  4. People v. Lent

    15 Cal.3d 481 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 1,267 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding order for $1,778 in restitution, which included $500 arising from the charge of which the defendant was convicted and $1,278 arising from the charge of which defendant was acquitted, because of the relationship of the total sum to the crime of which defendant was convicted
  5. In re Victor L.

    182 Cal.App.4th 902 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 367 times
    Holding condition of prohibiting entry in areas known for gang-related activity overbroad and vague
  6. In re Shaun R.

    188 Cal.App.4th 1129 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 318 times
    Approving condition prohibiting the display of gang clothing, logos, emblems, badges, or buttons
  7. People v. Lopez

    66 Cal.App.4th 615 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 386 times
    Holding probation condition which prohibited defendant from involvement in gang activities, association with any gang members, or use of gang insignia, was unconstitutionally overbroad because it prohibited him from associating with persons not known to him to be gang members; but overbreadth was correctable by inserting a knowledge requirement in each prohibition
  8. People v. Pirali

    217 Cal.App.4th 1341 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 236 times
    Concluding overbreadth claim not forfeited
  9. People ex Rel. Gallo v. Acuna

    14 Cal.4th 1090 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 369 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preliminary injunctions are reviewed "under an abuse of discretion standard"
  10. People v. Castenada

    23 Cal.4th 743 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 302 times
    Finding that legislature's wording of "actively participates," as contained in Cal. Penal Code § 186.22, is not void for vagueness