31 Cited authorities

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates

    455 U.S. 489 (1982)   Cited 2,856 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should consider constitutional challenge to statute as applied to plaintiff before considering other applications
  2. In re Sheena K

    40 Cal.4th 875 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 1,805 times
    In Sheena K., we approved the Court of Appeal's reliance on the vagueness doctrine to order modification of a probation condition barring the probationer from associating with " ‘anyone disapproved of by probation.
  3. People v. Carbajal

    10 Cal.4th 1114 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 738 times
    Noting that state courts have “broad discretion to determine whether an eligible defendant is suitable for probation and, if so, under what conditions”
  4. People v. Lent

    15 Cal.3d 481 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 1,251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Lent itself, "there [was] no question as to the relationship of the total sum of restitution ordered to the crime of which defendant was convicted."
  5. In re Victor L.

    182 Cal.App.4th 902 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 364 times
    In Victor L., the minor challenged three probation conditions: "(1) 'The Minor shall not access or participate in any Social Networking Site, including but not limited to Myspace.
  6. In re Shaun R.

    188 Cal.App.4th 1129 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 312 times
    In Shaun R., the court held that the routine continuation of a previous order without change does not revive the right to appeal.
  7. People v. Lopez

    66 Cal.App.4th 615 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 383 times
    Holding probation condition which prohibited defendant from involvement in gang activities, association with any gang members, or use of gang insignia, was unconstitutionally overbroad because it prohibited him from associating with persons not known to him to be gang members; but overbreadth was correctable by inserting a knowledge requirement in each prohibition
  8. People v. Pirali

    217 Cal.App.4th 1341 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 230 times
    In People v. Pirali (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1341, this court held that an adult probation condition barring the possession of "pornographic or sexually explicit materials as defined by the probation officer" was unconstitutionally vague because it used an "inherently subjective standard" to define the prohibited items.
  9. People ex Rel. Gallo v. Acuna

    14 Cal.4th 1090 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 367 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a civil injunction forbidding gang members from publicly appearing with other gang members in a particular neighborhood did not implicate any associational protections of the First Amendment
  10. Tobe v. City of Santa Ana

    9 Cal.4th 1069 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that plaintiffs had not established that they lacked "alternatives to either the condition of being homeless or the conduct that led to homelessness and to the citations"