§Why CasetextPricing

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA v. S.C. (CITY OF LOS ANGELES)

Amicus Curiae Brief of Electronic Privacy Information Center

10 Cited authorities

  1. McBurney v. Young

    569 U.S. 221 (2013)   Cited 544 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Virginia Freedom of Information Act did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause

  2. Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc.

    562 U.S. 397 (2011)   Cited 179 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a corporation could not exercise the FOIA "personal privacy" exemption because it was not a person

  3. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'n

    711 F.3d 180 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 176 times
    Holding that the twenty-day statutory timeline begins "once an agency receives a proper FOIA request"

  4. N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

    756 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that even though legal analysis in OLC memorandum must be disclosed, factual sections containing details of specific operations remained classified and exempt in their entirety

  5. N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

    758 F.3d 436 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 43 times

    Docket Nos. 13–422(L), 13–445(Con). 2014-07-10 The NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Charlie Savage, Scott Shane, American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, United States Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, Defendants–Appellees. Sharon Swingle, Atty., Appellate Staff, Civil Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Preet Bharara, U.S. Atty., Sarah S. Normand, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York, N

  6. N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

    762 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 42 times
    Holding that an initially confidential and advisory memorandum was no longer privileged after senior government officials invoked the memorandum and declared it binding authority

  7. Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

    117 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.D.C. 2015)   Cited 16 times
    Explaining that there is "no question" that an exemption pursuant to the attorney-client privilege is proper when the exempted material "contains a communication between a[n] [agency] employee and a[n] [agency] attorney seeking legal review and advice."

  8. Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Dep't of Justice Criminal Div.

    82 F. Supp. 3d 307 (D.D.C. 2015)   Cited 6 times
    Finding that the FBI's search was adequate when it used the key term "WikiLeaks" to search its central records system and then used those results to locate case agents with potentially responsive material

  9. Section 6250 - Legislative intent

    Cal. Gov. Code § 6250   Cited 654 times   12 Legal Analyses
    In section 6250, the Legislature declared it was “ ‘mindful of the right of individuals to privacy,’ ” and the dual concern for privacy and disclosure appears in numerous provisions throughout the CPRA.

  10. Section 3

    Cal. Const. art. I § 3   Cited 296 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Creating constitutional right of access to public agency records and calling for strict construction of statutes limiting such access