16 Cited authorities

Duncan v. Henry
513 U.S. 364 (1995) Cited 8,045 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding a claim raised in a state-court proceeding must be presented to that court as a federal constitutional claim or it is not exhausted for federal habeas corpus purposes
Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (1967) Cited 23,494 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
Schriro v. Summerlin
542 U.S. 348 (2004) Cited 2,207 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding "[n]ew substantive rules generally apply retroactively"
People v. Chiu
59 Cal.4th 155 (Cal. 2014) Cited 1,100 times
Holding that, as a matter of state law, an aider and abettor may not be convicted of first degree premeditated murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine
Fiore v. White
531 U.S. 225 (2001) Cited 330 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that it violates due process to convict a defendant for conduct that a “criminal statute, as properly interpreted, does not prohibit”
People v. Prettyman
14 Cal.4th 248 (Cal. 1996) Cited 1,108 times
Holding that CALJIC 3.01 and 3.02 which the judge also gave at Solis' trial "[do] not withdraw an element from the jury's determination or otherwise interject an impermissible presumption into the deliberative process"
People v. Medina
46 Cal.4th 913 (Cal. 2009) Cited 704 times
Finding that "an aggrieved employee's action under [PAGA] functions as a substitute for an action brought by the government itself"
People v. Guiton
4 Cal.4th 1116 (Cal. 1993) Cited 1,040 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding different standards of review apply depending on whether a theory of guilt is legally or factually insufficient
People v. Green
27 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. 1980) Cited 1,438 times
Holding "if the larcenous purpose does not arise until after the force has been used against the victim," defendant is not guilty of robbery
People v. Beeman
35 Cal.3d 547 (Cal. 1984) Cited 1,217 times
Holding that defendant is liable under aiding and abetting theory if he "act[ed] with knowledge of the criminal purpose of the perpetrator and with an intent or purpose either of committing, or of encouraging or facilitating commission of, the offense"
Rule 8.1115 - Citation of opinions
Cal. R. 8.1115 Cited 73,846 times
(a) Unpublished opinion Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. (b)Exceptions An unpublished opinion may be cited or relied on: (1) When the opinion is relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel; or (2) When the opinion is relevant to a criminal or disciplinary

MARTINEZ

16 Cited authorities

Holding a claim raised in a state-court proceeding must be presented to that court as a federal constitutional claim or it is not exhausted for federal habeas corpus purposes

Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"

Holding "[n]ew substantive rules generally apply retroactively"

Holding that, as a matter of state law, an aider and abettor may not be convicted of first degree premeditated murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine

Holding that it violates due process to convict a defendant for conduct that a “criminal statute, as properly interpreted, does not prohibit”

Holding that CALJIC 3.01 and 3.02 which the judge also gave at Solis' trial "[do] not withdraw an element from the jury's determination or otherwise interject an impermissible presumption into the deliberative process"

Finding that "an aggrieved employee's action under [PAGA] functions as a substitute for an action brought by the government itself"

Holding different standards of review apply depending on whether a theory of guilt is legally or factually insufficient

Holding "if the larcenous purpose does not arise until after the force has been used against the victim," defendant is not guilty of robbery

Holding that defendant is liable under aiding and abetting theory if he "act[ed] with knowledge of the criminal purpose of the perpetrator and with an intent or purpose either of committing, or of encouraging or facilitating commission of, the offense"